TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Still a substantial design problem remains with Google+

6 点作者 petar将近 14 年前

1 comment

afiler将近 14 年前
The problem of blasting out non-relevant messages to friends/followers/people who have you in a circle also occurs with Twitter and Facebook. Twitterers often solve this by opening more accounts and separating "my cat coughed up a hairball" and "I just wrote some awesome new app"-type posts into different accounts. Is there a way this is solved on Facebook? It seems like the closest practical solution is to start a group (that ends up primarily being dominated by its creator).<p>As Google+ is more focused on having a "real name" like Facebook is, will throwaway accounts work as well? The suggestion in this article is interesting, though I'd worry about excessive UI complexity. Then again, if Google were to let you create multiple accounts that ended up as sub-accounts (or just call them "roles" as in the article), one could elect to either follow an entire person or just one of their particular roles (if multiple roles exist).