SwissMiss Pimps Out Hotly Designed Gojee.com

This looks familiar...<p>I did the UX and front end implementation on a very similar site in July last year (having been inspired by thesixtyone.com myself).<p>Here's the site: <a href="http://BlaineFisherPhotography.com" rel="nofollow">http://BlaineFisherPhotography.com</a> Here's a walk through of the creative &#38; dev process: <a href="http://voltagecreative.com/articles/blaine-fisher-photography-site-launch/" rel="nofollow">http://voltagecreative.com/articles/blaine-fisher-photograph...</a><p>I love this design aesthetic and am glad to see it catching on more and more.

The site looks great and is fun to use.<p>But thinking about how Gojee might plan to make money, I'm reminded of the difference between a product and a feature:<p><a href="http://www.philmichaelson.com/founding-decisions/build-a-business-not-a-feature/" rel="nofollow">http://www.philmichaelson.com/founding-decisions/build-a-bus...</a><p>EDIT:<p>I didn't realize the author of that post is working on another recipe site. No idea if he's following his own advice or not ;)

Thanks Leftnode.<p>Because we just launched Gojee, we've chosen to focus on improving the depth of the browsing experience for a majority of current internet users. That means the major browsers on fairly recent machines and mobile.<p>We're not perfect, but we're improving day by day. If you have any problems/suggestions, feel free to email me at tian.he@gojee.com

Must give email before you show me a reason I want to give you my email?<p>No thanks.

Gojee.com is poorly tested because it was attempting to animate giant background images which bring an older machine or one without a GPU to a crawl.