TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

US ISPs to Disrupt Internet Access of Copyright Scofflaws

22 点作者 vabole将近 14 年前

4 条评论

bediger将近 14 年前
This is a rubbish article. It confuses "theft" with "infringement". Mostly, it calls the action of infringement an "offense", but at one point it calls it an "infraction", The article fails to say who decides if an "offense" or "infraction" occurs. Usually, conviction of a crime requires some kind of judicial activity, but other sources report that mere accusation of infringement is what counts as an "infraction".<p>This whole scheme is most un-American. No presumption of innocence is made, no judicial review occurs, and there is no procedure in place to redress mistakes. The RIAA is a known un-American organization, seeking to undermine basic constitutional rights like Freedom of Speech, Freedom from unreasonable search and seizure, due process of law, and presumption of innocence. I call upon the ISPs in question to stop performing un-American actions, and diassociate themselves from the nearly-fascist RIAA and MPAA.
评论 #2739184 未加载
评论 #2739429 未加载
danielsoneg将近 14 年前
Ok, this is just ridiculous. I've really tried to do this right - I have Netflix, RDIO, Pandora, and Amazon Select, and by and large, if something's available on those services, I don't go trying to dig it up somewhere else.<p>If I'm not paying for something, it's because the media companies won't let me, not because I'm not willing.
joejohnson将近 14 年前
Woah. Does anyone have more information about this? I wish the article said which ISPs. All of them?
评论 #2738953 未加载
rnernento将近 14 年前
Honestly this looks pretty tame... The only scary part is the lack of definition of what exactly constitutes an infraction.