TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Why we should end the data economy

519 点作者 oppodeldoc将近 4 年前

50 条评论

cs702将近 4 年前
No one sane would ever want their relatives, friends, work colleagues, and neighbors to be able to know (quoting from the OP):<p><i>&gt; who you sleep with because both you and the person you share your bed with keep your phones nearby<p>&gt; whether you sleep soundly at night or whether your troubles are keeping you up<p>&gt; whether you pick up your phone in the middle of the night and search for things like &quot;loan repayment&quot;<p>&gt; your IQ based on the pages you &quot;like&quot; on Facebook and the friends you have<p>&gt; your restaurant visits and shopping habits<p>&gt; how fast you drive, even if you don&#x27;t have a smart car, because your phone contains an accelerometer<p>&gt; your life expectancy based on how fast you walk, as measured by your phone<p>&gt; whether you suffer from depression by how you slide your finger across your phone’s screen<p>&gt; if your spouse is considering leaving you because she&#x27;s been searching online for a divorce lawyer</i><p>No one sane is OK with corporations, governments, and other third parties being able to obtain and save this information either -- <i>especially</i> if their only hurdle is to get you to click &quot;OK&quot; to agree to some legal agreement almost no one has the time to read or expertise to understand in its full implications.<p>We need a <i>New Declaration of Human Rights</i> for the 21st century that takes into account rapidly advancing technologies for collecting and acting on data at mass scale.
评论 #27396409 未加载
评论 #27398554 未加载
评论 #27396910 未加载
评论 #27397332 未加载
评论 #27396733 未加载
评论 #27400170 未加载
评论 #27396834 未加载
评论 #27400758 未加载
评论 #27396455 未加载
评论 #27398658 未加载
评论 #27397156 未加载
评论 #27397052 未加载
评论 #27401635 未加载
评论 #27397178 未加载
评论 #27396866 未加载
评论 #27402953 未加载
评论 #27402514 未加载
评论 #27398521 未加载
评论 #27403590 未加载
评论 #27402830 未加载
评论 #27399671 未加载
评论 #27398460 未加载
评论 #27398883 未加载
评论 #27396807 未加载
评论 #27396994 未加载
评论 #27396546 未加载
评论 #27396625 未加载
infogulch将近 4 年前
Somehow organizations get an immense amount of value out of tracking everything you do, say, think, and buy; everywhere you go; and everyone you meet. Two questions:<p>1. Why should they profit off of my data without my consent? (Hint: they shouldn&#x27;t.)<p>2. Why is it so hard for me to get value out of it? Shit, if it&#x27;s gonna be collected, aggregated, and analyzed anyway, I should just do it my damn self and actually get something out of it. It&#x27;s like we need an open source community for personal data collection, aggregation, and analysis.
评论 #27396482 未加载
评论 #27396547 未加载
评论 #27397262 未加载
评论 #27398522 未加载
评论 #27397066 未加载
评论 #27396505 未加载
评论 #27396504 未加载
评论 #27400302 未加载
评论 #27396362 未加载
评论 #27403709 未加载
anm89将近 4 年前
Explaining to people what they should do regarding matters that there are no ways to achieve the stated goals is the laziest, lowest value category of journalism. It&#x27;s a plague.
评论 #27395810 未加载
评论 #27395705 未加载
评论 #27399769 未加载
评论 #27395408 未加载
评论 #27405104 未加载
评论 #27395648 未加载
评论 #27395400 未加载
评论 #27395463 未加载
34679将近 4 年前
Anyone engaged in the collection and sale of data should be required to maintain a list of their customers. Upon the sale of data, the customer should be required to provide their list to the broker. At the point of collection&#x2F;consent, the list should be made available to the consumer.<p>For example: You want to vote in an online poll by company A. Company A collects data about you and sells it, so you must agree to their privacy policy. Company A&#x27;s privacy policy discloses that they sell your data to Companies B, C and D. Companies B, C and D have provided a list of its customers to Company A, and Company A includes those lists as well. In addition, the customers of those companies provide lists (as all data brokers would be required to do).<p>If its seems like it could get overly complicated with huge lists of data brokers for a simple online poll, that&#x27;s the idea. You shouldn&#x27;t have to wonder how many entities you&#x27;re giving access to your information when, for example, you want to vote for MLB All-stars. MLB wants your name, address, email, phone number, and they disclose they&#x27;ll &quot;share it with partners&quot; but they don&#x27;t say who those partners are, how many exist, and if they have their own &quot;partners&quot;. Vote for your favorite player and you could be getting a phone call for life insurance 15 minutes later after your number has been passed through 5 different companies.
评论 #27396421 未加载
rhacker将近 4 年前
We need to go back to the TV model. I mean we sold things back in 1995 right?<p>You go to a website about babies, you get baby ads.<p>You go to a website about electrified fences, you get ads for trucks, tractors, backhoe rentals (even in your area because of your IP address - but that&#x27;s it)<p>It&#x27;s damn near equivalent to local &#x2F; cable TV.
评论 #27395744 未加载
评论 #27396536 未加载
评论 #27395862 未加载
Barraketh将近 4 年前
Honestly, I&#x27;m kind of sick of how bad a rap advertising gets. Now sure, companies knowing a lot about your personal life is creepy on an intuitive level, but the fact of the matter is that cookie tracking data has NEVER been associated with any leak or data breach that resulted in personal harm. The thing people SHOULD be worried about is stuff like the Experian leak, where credit companies collect your non-anonymized personal data.<p>Also, fact is that matching consumers with products that they like doesn&#x27;t just have enormous business value, but is actually socially positive! If you can more easily reach a niche audience, you can build better more targeted products. And the open data exchanges were a great moat against platform centralization like FB. The fight against open data exchanges make the comparative advantage FB has in advertising to you larger. That&#x27;s actually pretty bad, because FB has some pretty bad incentives wrt to the attention economy and optimizing for engagement. A world where advertising on independent websites is effective is a much better one - it would let websites put out better content, it would decrease the power of social networks, it could fund better journalism (which is being decimated right now), etc.
评论 #27396320 未加载
评论 #27396107 未加载
评论 #27396368 未加载
评论 #27396311 未加载
评论 #27396384 未加载
评论 #27397599 未加载
评论 #27396287 未加载
评论 #27397683 未加载
评论 #27396562 未加载
评论 #27396297 未加载
评论 #27396451 未加载
评论 #27396015 未加载
评论 #27396814 未加载
评论 #27396689 未加载
评论 #27396131 未加载
评论 #27396246 未加载
评论 #27400285 未加载
评论 #27396027 未加载
评论 #27396585 未加载
评论 #27396319 未加载
version_five将近 4 年前
What these kinds of articles (that basically just say how much of our data is being collected, and assert that it&#x27;s bad) miss is the whole &quot;attention economy&quot; side of the equation, which I believe is more detrimental.<p>Data is concretely used to maximize engagement, outrage, polarization, etc. in order to get more attention, which is at a root of a lot of the public discourse challenges we have these days. It would be much more benign if tracking was really just about trying to see what I am most likely to buy and target that to me.
评论 #27396354 未加载
评论 #27395610 未加载
DanielBMarkham将近 4 年前
I think a big part of the problem here is that our computers, and the associated data they collect, are part of our extended brains. They&#x27;re not record players, hotel registers, or any other metaphor society or our legal system has used in the past. It&#x27;s virtually as if you could take part of your brain out and hand it to somebody, perhaps to whistle a tune you remember from school or recount that chat you had with your previous SO.<p>It&#x27;s not okay to take a person and hold them against their will, even if they&#x27;ve signed some sort of agreement. Indentured servitude and slavery are considered non-viable business arrangements. No matter what I promise you or what our trade-off is, these contracts cannot exist.<p>I think the only way this reasonably ends is when the rest of society catches up to that conclusion. It might be a while, though. I honestly don&#x27;t think most people _want_ to know what&#x27;s going on, since it&#x27;s quite frightening and there&#x27;s nothing they can do about it. This is going to have to get more and more stressful to the average citizen until most folks realize what kind of world we&#x27;ve crept into.
not_jd_salinger将近 4 年前
The &quot;data economy&quot; is just an extension of the &quot;Advertising Economy&quot;.<p>Of course the idea of an &quot;Advertising Economy&quot; should cause people to pause a bit since advertising, by its nature, can only help maximize profits for somebody else. In theory the money that gets pumped into advertising can only be squeezed from the profits of other companies who are doing some optimization, weighing the cost of advertising vs the increase in their market. The maximum amount it makes sense to pay an advertiser is proportional to the increase in the audience they provide, with the assumption that your profit - fee * population_ads &gt; profit * population_no_ads.<p>One thing should be very clear, advertising cannot create value, it can only extract some of the surplus value that other companies are creating. This puts a pretty hard limit on how big advertisers can grow.<p>The solution to this was of course to take the byproduct of advertising, the generation of large amounts of demographic data, and transform that into a product. Suddenly selling, sorting and manipulating data create an entirely new class of products and create demand for new professionals as well.<p>The advertising industry, specializing in creating the illusion of value when their may be none, has done a brilliant job of convincing everyone that data is inherently values. Allowing tech companies to sell not only their data, that is often of questionable actual value, but the infrastructure to use this data, and sell training in the skills necessary to work with big data.<p>The &quot;data economy&quot; is just advertising turned in on itself. Anyone who works with data knows deep down that all of this is a farce, but I think we still have a bit of time before all of this hits the fan, so enjoy the ride.
评论 #27399347 未加载
ayngg将近 4 年前
Data feels like the next resource (like hydrocarbons or other resource extraction) where it can be exploited for massive profit while its costs externalized for the rest of society to bear.<p>Like how it took decades for society to come around to human influenced climate change, it will probably take a while for people to accept the social and mental health costs associated with the extraction and use of this resource, or we will get to a point where people are manipulated enough to be insulated from such a realization.
pascalxus将近 4 年前
The article implies a lot of risk for having so much personal data circulating around without our control. but the article, and many others like it fail to show how all that risk can adversely affect us.<p>I mean, so what if my neighbor gets a different ad than I did? maybe he&#x27;s into red shirts and I like blue shirts. so what if he got a cheaper plane ticket advertisement? I&#x27;m not going to buy a ticket unless it&#x27;s cheap enough to do so. so what if i didn&#x27;t get an advertisment for a college degree, it&#x27;s not going to impact whether or not I&#x27;m going back to school, etc. so what if an ad uses emotional language specifically targetted towards my political demographic, it&#x27;s not going to make a difference to me after I investigate the matter objectively.
评论 #27395991 未加载
评论 #27395999 未加载
joadha将近 4 年前
The so-called &quot;data economy&quot; has improved our lives in immeasurable ways. I can more easily discover products that are relevant to me. Deserving innovations are granted a platform for quicker adoption. The world at large is more efficient, because relevant products and services are being delivered more quickly and efficiently than ever before.<p>The author is extremely paranoid. She uses the word &quot;should&quot; a whole lot, but does not back up her dictatorial statements with any reasoning.<p>This article has failed to scare me as intended.
评论 #27397172 未加载
评论 #27397660 未加载
hvocode将近 4 年前
I&#x27;m all for significantly limiting the &quot;data economy&quot;, but I suspect too many people have become too used to getting free stuff. I see this all over the place - there are products and services that are quite expensive to build and provide, but they&#x27;re free because people (often unwittingly) exchange data about themselves in place of the actual cost. If you still want those products&#x2F;services without the data industry supporting it, someone will have to pay for them. I think lots of people opposed to the data economy will become less opposed when faced with actually paying for stuff it supports.<p>I learned this the hard way trying to sell something that competed with free tools from Facebook&#x2F;Google&#x2F;[other giant data monetizing companies]. Our tool was&#x2F;is competitive, but we aren&#x27;t in the business of data harvesting or advertising - so, the engineering cost (many years of effort) would have to be paid from actually selling the product. The response? People want the free ones, and could really care less how the engineers that built it were paid as long as THEY (the consumer of the tool) got it for free.<p>As long as the &quot;someone else will pay for X so I can have it for free&quot; attitude is acceptable and widespread, we&#x27;re likely stuck with a pervasive and deep data economy.
nostrademons将近 4 年前
People should own the data about them, and should be free to rent or trade usage of it to companies in exchange for money or services. Actual ownership should continue to rest with the person, however, who can revoke access the same way that a landlord can evict tenants or a worker can quit.<p>The biggest barrier to this has been that lots of valuable data (eg. Facebook&#x27;s social graph, Android contact data) is data about <i>relationships</i> between people, not the people themselves, and so would logically have multiple owners. But that&#x27;s not really a big barrier with modern technology: the crypto world solved multi-person ownership with multisig wallets several years ago.
评论 #27396410 未加载
julienb_sea将近 4 年前
We derive great benefit from the &quot;data economy&quot; in the form of services which are NOT free to develop or operate but have no cost associated with their usage. We also enjoy the benefits when it comes to social connections, disaster recovery, and tracking our lost valuables. It is not going away.<p>The potential pitfalls of the data economy are about overbearing or violent governments, or about poorly managed data protection. This has much more to do with the bad actors than the tools they are using. It&#x27;s sort of like saying we should ban information distribution because bad actors can spread misinformation.
scyzoryk_xyz将近 4 年前
We can&#x27;t really stop the Data Economy. If we&#x27;re bleeding data all over the place then we can only maintain good habits of data hygiene. But then we know that will never be perfect. Some fingerprints will always remain, some breadcrumbs will always be hoovered up by the bots.<p>I use adblockers and vpns and other such things but then I have accounts with facebooks and whatsapps. Could I camouflage my &#x27;scent&#x27; with perfume? What&#x27;s more - could I feed misleading data in? I really wouldn&#x27;t mind being a VIP in the eyes of these shitty algorithms.
EMM_386将近 4 年前
I&#x27;m curious, can insurance companies get access to this information to potentially affect policy rates?<p>That would be insane. If they know how sedentary you are, or if you aren&#x27;t sleeping well, or if you are driving too fast, driving at dangerous hours, or if you hang out at the bar too much ... can you imagine the implications?<p>It gets even wilder with things like Fitbit Charge 4 where this data, in the hands of data brokers, can include data like your resting heart rate, your SpO2 levels, exactly where&#x2F;when you walk.
评论 #27397343 未加载
bobthechef将近 4 年前
Articles that make declarations about how bad X is and then follow that up with empty calls to action like &quot;We need to end X&quot; to get people nodding their heads in agreement are common and cheap. What&#x27;s your solution? Is there one?<p>Sure, you can draw attention to something bad, but if all you ever do is live off the drama and frantically declare that X &quot;needs to stop&quot; (I loathe that airheaded phrase like few others), what good are you? Who&#x27;s going to stop it? Passive voice does not impress. When I need to eat, I eat. I don&#x27;t say &quot;I need to eat&quot; and leave it at that. I&#x27;d starve.<p>Clearly you think it can be stopped. Clearly you think it&#x27;s not just an unfortunate malady of the age that we must bear. You think it can be fixed. Where&#x27;s your proposal? How are we going to shift the tech economy away from surveillance?<p>The growth of the data economy is like the growth of finance. Neither finance nor data gathering actually produce anything. They can help produce something, inform or facilitate the production, but it&#x27;s not productive in itself. In the limit, you&#x27;re left with a hot potato economy where people gather data to sell for the purpose of gathering more data.<p>Maybe this is incentivized by the killing of the industrial base. Everything we buy is from China. All the US does is consume.
评论 #27396480 未加载
Aunche将近 4 年前
Disclaimer: I work at a company that collects user data.<p>The author is fearmongering big tech because she envies all the money they are making. Facebook does not sell user data, and I&#x27;m pretty sure the author knows this but intentionally perpetuates this misconception anyways. Facebook would collect about as much user data regardless of whether they used it for targeted advertising.
djoldman将近 4 年前
Anyone know of a confirmed instance of:<p>&gt; They generate profits by ... selling [your personal information] to ... <i>prospective employers</i> ...<p>?<p>This one seems unlikely but who knows.
评论 #27396117 未加载
评论 #27395901 未加载
评论 #27395685 未加载
kazinator将近 4 年前
Part of the data economy is this curious phenomenon: nicely styled web articles, where 99.9999% of the effort goes into producing the graphical artwork (often just for that article, not from a stock library!), and the text is just someone banging out some Reddit-comment-level crap for 5-10 minutes.<p>Imagine this in a plain document with no CSS:<p><pre><code> &lt;body&gt; &lt;h2&gt;Why We Should End the Data Economy&lt;&#x2F;h2&gt; &lt;p&gt;The data economy depends on violating our right to privacy on a massive scale, collecting as much personal data as possible for profit.&lt;&#x2F;p&gt; &lt;p&gt;...&lt;&#x2F;p&gt; ... </code></pre> Now it&#x27;s just the rant of some loser who doesn&#x27;t even know the first thing about making an attractive web page, and doesn&#x27;t have any friends who are graphical designers or artists to help him or her sell the idea to the masses.
jeffrogers将近 4 年前
“They generate profits by compiling a profile of you from your data trail and then selling it to the highest bidder”<p>Connecting another dot on this point: The creation and widespread use of such profiles -which are not merely comprised of data, but are summary conclusions about people- may well make the U.S. into a genuinely caste society. Without rules regarding things like data aging, publicly accessible profile monitoring, and bad data correction… and when to provide some sort rehabilitation method, people will eventually become just a collection of their mistakes and forced into one bucket or another.<p>We need something akin to the Fair Credit Reporting Act and a set of laws that provide better guide-rails for when data can be collected, by who, for what purpose, when it can be sold or used for a purpose other than why it was first collected, etc.
ipsin将近 4 年前
As I understand it, CCPA means any California resident could hypothetically write a data broker, get their own file, and determine how much <i>actual</i> tracking is going on.<p>All the hypothetical examples are realistic, but... what are the names of companies that are actually providing that level of data about me?
pascalxus将近 4 年前
And yet, with all this information about me, they still struggle to come up with even the slightest big of relevant advertising. 99.9% of the products I see advertised to me are either completely irrelevant to me or products I down right hate: and I never buy them. If they do have all the information the article claims, it just doesn&#x27;t seem like they&#x27;re able to use it in an effective manner. So what&#x27;s the harm?<p>the key here, is, just don&#x27;t buy products you don&#x27;t want or don&#x27;t need. as long as you do that, you&#x27;ll be fine. I have yet to meet a single Ad that forced me to buy a product I didn&#x27;t really want or need. And, just don&#x27;t let the ads manipulate you.
RGamma将近 4 年前
Viewing the world through the data lens makes you blind to the things you didn&#x27;t measure or that you cannot conceive a measurement for.<p>It also stifles original thought that is conceived independent of how things are or what people like (&quot;culture becomes stuck&quot;).<p>When dealing with data you need to be aware of your own unfixable shortcomings as an observer. And if you can influence people&#x27;s behavior at scale you&#x27;re no longer an independent observer anyway, complicating things further (a measurement that becomes a target stops being a measurement).<p>There isn&#x27;t one truth you could uncover in data; life is an open-ended chaotic system. Let&#x27;s keep it that way.
评论 #27399020 未加载
Hasz将近 4 年前
Ending the data economy means ending inference. Most of the examples listed in the opening paragraph are not direct measurements, but mundane behavior that can associated with something interesting. I don’t think stopping inference is possible (or a good idea!), but it is easy to subvert and reign in, at least online.<p>Simply letting your browser emulate the browsing habits of a wide variety of people could knock down your uniqueness if done in bulk. I’m pretty sure there was a chrome extension a while ago that browsered major sites to obfuscate your actual traffic. I also like the EFF’s panopticon if you’d like to see some real value uniqueness scores.
prohobo将近 4 年前
This is a bit weird... The Reboot is sponsored by DFINITY, which is the company behind the Internet Computer and did a presentation at the World Economic Forum in 2020. (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=FfTJEMj1GTw" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=FfTJEMj1GTw</a>)<p>The WEF is 100% pro datamining the shit out of everyone, and AFAIK they only invite people who share their vision of the future. So, why is DFINITY making presentations for them while also sponsoring anti datamining journalism?<p>I&#x27;m not saying that &quot;THIS IS WRONG!&quot; I&#x27;m just confused as to what&#x27;s going on here.
bdamm将近 4 年前
The author writes as if exploitation is a new phenomenon. It is annoyingly naïve.
29athrowaway将近 4 年前
If you can&#x27;t hide your activity just pollute their data to the point it becomes unuseable. Give them data that makes them lose money.<p>Search random stuff you are not interested in and see them desperately throw money into the toilet.<p>Search plane tickets to Congo, saxophones, windsurf equipment, paintings of toucans... the most random shit you can think of.<p>Then you will start seeing ads for that, which is seeing the ad tech imploding in front of your eyes.<p>The more you do it and the more other people do it, the less profitable ad tech becomes.<p>Also search for stuff outside your demographics, like stuff for older people, so they get your profile wrong.
emodendroket将近 4 年前
This reminds me of when people want to &quot;reverse financialization&quot; or &quot;get rid of the shareholder value model.&quot; How are you going to reverse an idea and what are you going to replace it with?
评论 #27398590 未加载
ram_rar将近 4 年前
Similar to KYC (Know your customer) [1] in financial services industry. We need Know your Data Broker for customers, where in customers can know which data brokers have used their information. Most of the data brokers run in the dark and very few outside of tech are aware of it. Data Brokers should allows customers to be opted out and purge information from their systems if needed.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Know_your_customer" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Know_your_customer</a>
herunan将近 4 年前
If only it were about advertising… Your attention is everything. Even beyond buying things or not. Your views about certain aspects of your life are affected by your senses and experiences, and so much comes from what you see, hear, and read online. Your data informs a lot of what ends up in your screen, which keeps shaping who you are. This vicious circle is what I call losing agency in the digital age. Are you OK with losing your individuality? What makes you… you? That’s my reason towards privacy.
websites3434将近 4 年前
The people who are OK with this kind of thing -- &quot;But nothing bad has ever happened to anyone IRL&quot; -- are obviously not part of a minority ethnic&#x2F;religious&#x2F;sexual orientation&#x2F;gender group. This kind of technology is already used to do harm in China. Those of us in those groups don&#x27;t have the luxury of &quot;waiting to see if the nightmare becomes real&quot; because of some of us would be in the crosshairs, not potential bystanders.
评论 #27397822 未加载
cevered将近 4 年前
I highly suggest you guys checkout Decentr. They are building blockchain platform that allows individuals to have ownership over their personal data to exchange and leverage for economic benefits in a decentralized and secure way. I think it&#x27;s false to say we can&#x27;t collect data in a secure way therefore stop the data economy. We should be seeking to empower individuals with the ownership of their own data to create a true data economy.
评论 #27397490 未加载
评论 #27396671 未加载
uberdru将近 4 年前
I remember a time when the virtue that separated the U.S. from, say, East Germany, was the assurance that your library borrowing history was sacrosanct.
EGreg将近 4 年前
And how do you propose to do that?<p>I wrote this back in 2014: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;magarshak.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;?p=169" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;magarshak.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;?p=169</a><p>And here is the solution: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;qbix.com&#x2F;QBUX&#x2F;whitepaper.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;qbix.com&#x2F;QBUX&#x2F;whitepaper.html</a><p>Thoughts?
tibiahurried将近 4 年前
The Data Economy is what enables &quot;free&quot; product for the end-user. Think about email, drive, video. Users are now used to get most of this stuff for free. And that&#x27;s possible thanks to the Data Economy.<p>End such economy basically means the users will start paying for the internet. Never gonna happen.
MisterBastahrd将近 4 年前
Just have it so that any time a person or company&#x27;s data is sold or leased, the company doing the selling must mail (via physical correspondence) the person or company with a notification of what data was sent and why.<p>People will get tired of the junk mail and companies will lose money trying to peddle data.
agumonkey将近 4 年前
Isn&#x27;t the data economy a sign of the end of the economical ladder ? we have nothing new to sell ..
2dog将近 4 年前
I&#x27;m in the data business, this article is wrong on many levels but whatever...<p>The biggest faux pas is &quot;your PII is sold to the highest bidder&quot;. Not true, your PII (and mine) is sold to any bidder who hits the minimum threshold&#x2F;rate, currently less the 12cents CPM
ivan888将近 4 年前
We need something like the Nutrition Facts label for digital consent: government mandated, consistent format, easy to scan. Even better if it was an interactive form to allow you to selectively consent to specific options
holoduke将近 4 年前
Wasnt here on hn someone who created a bot able to randomly like messages on FB, search for nonsense on Google, post random tweets on twitter etc, spoofs GPS etc. Would love to use something like that
networkid将近 4 年前
&quot;Foreign countries use data about our personalities to polarize us&quot;, Really? Maybe it&#x27;s all your politicians does?
atomicbeanie将近 4 年前
Hogwash. Sharing data and having it stolen are two different things. Luddites did not account for what their idea of the future would miss out on. The data future offers new opportunities in reality based communication.<p>Working on serious problems like climate change would be hobbled without the rise of the data economy. But to be an economy it must have rules that protect private, personal and ethically important entities.
intricatedetail将近 4 年前
Ban ad targeting first and suddenly it won&#x27;t be economical to store such data.
dontparticipate将近 4 年前
There&#x27;s not a single person that doesn&#x27;t understand the &quot;why&quot; of this, especially on HN. There&#x27;s just no &quot;how&quot; there. It&#x27;s pretty clear so far that GDPR&#x2F;CCPA have been complete failures. Companies just design around them and consumers are in no position to jump through the hoops those companies have set up to defend themselves. The game is already over and we&#x27;ve lost and articles like these are just hope porn wishing for a better world that we will never see.
bsedlm将近 4 年前
I think we should go further, into a full review of what it means to own something. However this is rather ambitious considering that the idea of ownerhsip lies at the very foundation of civilization as we do it.<p>But the nature of &quot;digital property&quot; has changed things. If you think the printing press changed the nature of human societies, just wait until the internet has existed for a few hundred years and their corresponding number of generations.<p>Capitalist market economies, trade-centric as they are, have evolved around a world in which all property is exclusive. However starting from printing press up to &quot;model-T&quot;--style mass production (the development of industrial societies) reduced the cost of copying and duplicating stuff more more until the creation of the internet brought about &quot;digital goods&quot; (such as all your personal data) which has duplication costs _below_ marginal (I think digital copying has essentially ZERO cost).<p>Digital goods provide a huge boon if we are able to stop trying to force-fit them into a system which works great for physical (i.e. exclusive) goods. Why and how did Microsoft become what it is during the 90s? because of huge savings in duplicating their software in a society that expected said duplication to have a not-negible cost.
anticristi将近 4 年前
&gt; Ending the data economy may seem like a radical proposition,<p>Not in 2021. In 2018, GDPR went into force in the EU. In 2018, CCPA went into force in California, US. In 2021, VCDPA went into force in Virginia, US. At least with GDPR serious fines were passed.<p>The right to data privacy is no longer a John-Lennon-like hippie idea. It is law. Now go and fix you business model.
akomtu将近 4 年前
If greed is steam and capitalism is a steam engine, then surveillance capitalism is a modern steam engine with lots of sensors optimizing its performance.
评论 #27395613 未加载
peter303将近 4 年前
Irony: I got an &quot;accept cookies&quot; button when reading the article.