TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Changes to Docker Hub Autobuilds

66 点作者 bnr将近 4 年前

11 条评论

WnZ39p0Dgydaz1将近 4 年前
Docker, the company, is such a sad story. They have such an impactful technology but completely failed to monetize it and lost multiple revenue streams to competitors. Shows how hard "open source companies" are. Others OSS companies have similar problems. It would be nice to find economic models where impact is correlated with revenue.
评论 #27435256 未加载
评论 #27435323 未加载
评论 #27436504 未加载
howolduis将近 4 年前
cryptocurrencies are ruining hardware availability (both GPU and now storage devices), the environment and now free cloud services. When are we gonna admit it?<p>EDIT: typo
评论 #27434940 未加载
评论 #27435280 未加载
评论 #27434469 未加载
评论 #27435031 未加载
raesene9将近 4 年前
Sorry, but not really surprised to see this go (for free accounts).<p>TBH I&#x27;m surprised that they managed to keep this going as long as they have. Giving away free compute is a tricky thing to make financially viable.
TimWolla将近 4 年前
Too bad. IMO the big benefit of automated builds was that Docker Hub was linked the source repository and showed the original Dockerfile, so that one was able to more easily verify what exactly a Docker image contains (provided one trusts Docker to correctly build these automated builds).
gtirloni将近 4 年前
If this means a better experience for paying customers, I&#x27;m all for it. I have no problem with companies charging for their services.
评论 #27436340 未加载
评论 #27436122 未加载
SlimyHog将近 4 年前
This seems reasonable to me as a free user. I thought it was rad that I got free compute from dockerhub, but CPU cycles aren&#x27;t free.
zwass将近 4 年前
Do folks here have ideas of what will become the best place to host public Docker container images? Between this and the earlier changes to rate limit pulls, Docker Hub no longer seems like the ideal venue for reputable public images.<p>Should we look into implementing our own registry with AWS ECR or similar?
评论 #27439781 未加载
评论 #27438420 未加载
评论 #27436184 未加载
nirui将近 4 年前
Sad. I was hoping for multi-arch support (for Free tier, I don&#x27;t make money out of my opensource image), and got this instead.<p>I wish the company could eventually found a way to make more money. Kubernetes too heavy to run, while Docker Swarm is rather reasonable. I guess there is a market gap?(???)
评论 #27434382 未加载
评论 #27434598 未加载
评论 #27434643 未加载
j1elo将近 4 年前
Maybe it is possible to detect the kind of activity or identify processes that are written to mine crypto? Then abort those ones.<p>I&#x27;m thinking of behavior analysis, such as the one some network firewalls do... not sure if that&#x27;s even feasible at the process level, though.
评论 #27435091 未加载
评论 #27435370 未加载
yabones将近 4 年前
I think Docker (the company) just admitted defeat to GitHub. Wow. It&#x27;s amazing how they blew such an incredible lead over the last decade.
评论 #27434372 未加载
评论 #27434797 未加载
评论 #27434491 未加载
devmor将近 4 年前
Normally, I would take this at face value. But from the company that just started charging users to allow them to skip upgrades, it feels like more nickel and dime tactics to me.
评论 #27434886 未加载