TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Senate approves $250B bill to boost tech research

129 点作者 julienchastang将近 4 年前

13 条评论

InTheArena将近 4 年前
The bail out in this bill for blue origin is unbelievable. It’s like somebody looked at the SLS and decided hey! We need more programs like that. It distorts the market badly, and it Removes any Incentive for commercial entities to offer reasonable prices.
评论 #27445094 未加载
评论 #27449449 未加载
评论 #27447577 未加载
评论 #27443983 未加载
RobLach将近 4 年前
<i>The Endless Frontier Act (EFA) is one of the most important legislative proposals you’ve never heard of — or at least it was.<p>First introduced last year by Senators Chuck Schumer and Todd Young, the bill would have established a new Technology Directorate at the National Science Foundation (NSF) with a DARPA-like program structure equipped with flexible hiring and grant-making authorities. With a $100 billion budget over five years, the Directorate would have been empowered to use grants, contracts, prizes, and cooperative agreements with industry, academia and research institutes to push the frontiers of U.S. innovation in ten broad areas, ranging from cutting-edge technologies like Artificial Intelligence and quantum computing, to more mature but no less important sectors like robotics, manufacturing, biotechnology, advanced energy technology and material sciences.<p>That was then, this is now. While the mission of the Technology Directorate remains nominally intact, the scale of the EFA’s ambitions were suddenly curtailed late last week. Following a flurry of Senate Commerce Committee amendments, the $100 billion originally envisioned for the Directorate dropped to just $29 billion over five years, with $54.9 billion reassigned to the NSF-proper. Of that $29 billion, only 15% or $4.35 billion is reserved for the Directorate’s core R&amp;D mission, with the rest earmarked for scholarships, test beds, academic tech transfer, and investments in regional “innovation centers.”</i><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.niskanencenter.org&#x2F;how-congress-ruined-the-endless-frontier-act&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.niskanencenter.org&#x2F;how-congress-ruined-the-endle...</a>
评论 #27443660 未加载
nscalf将近 4 年前
Lots of knee jerk hate on the government for spending money in this thread. Investing in R&amp;D (and infrastructure) is more or less the best investment the government can make. Historically these investments have been incredibly successful, and have allowed the US to lead the world in a number of ways. We have some of the best researchers in the world, we should give them money to do their research.<p>On the hate for government contractors---like any R&amp;D investment, they don&#x27;t all pan out. This is why we make redundant investments. Overall, the ROI has been very positive even including the failures.<p>On the increased size of government spending---we&#x27;re already spending trillions, I know it sounds big, we&#x27;ve inflated very quickly. This is how watered down money is now though, we need to adapt to the new inflated price of things. Personally, I have a huge amount of patience for investments in technology research. The other way we get out from under debt is raising taxes. Would you rather see tax rates hike and no real progress be made, or returns from investments help get us out from this hole and advance technology?
评论 #27449722 未加载
throwaway4good将近 4 年前
This article has more details:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.washingtonpost.com&#x2F;us-policy&#x2F;2021&#x2F;06&#x2F;08&#x2F;senate-china-science-technology&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.washingtonpost.com&#x2F;us-policy&#x2F;2021&#x2F;06&#x2F;08&#x2F;senate-c...</a><p>Senate approves sprawling $250 billion bill to curtail China’s economic and military ambitions<p>And it links to the actual bill:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.democrats.senate.gov&#x2F;imo&#x2F;media&#x2F;doc&#x2F;DAV21A48.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.democrats.senate.gov&#x2F;imo&#x2F;media&#x2F;doc&#x2F;DAV21A48.pdf</a>
nomoreplease将近 4 年前
Are we desensitized to large dollar numbers? The past year we have spent trillions more than previous years. Has anyone looked at the total govt debt in a whole?
评论 #27443767 未加载
评论 #27444268 未加载
评论 #27444355 未加载
评论 #27444804 未加载
paulpauper将近 4 年前
Remarkable how much spending has ballooned over the past 13 years, and this is coming from someone who is receptive to MMT. This is about 1&#x2F;3 the size of the 2008 bank bailout, which at the time was a monumental undertaking and not without considerable deliberation, yet $250 billion now feels like an afterthought, at a whim. We really are in the era of free money. We&#x27;re nowhere near the boundary what is possible.
评论 #27444970 未加载
评论 #27447011 未加载
评论 #27448151 未加载
评论 #27445328 未加载
tibbydudeza将近 4 年前
Semiconductors are the new F35.<p>I won&#x27;t be too surprised if Lockheed Martin forms a semiconductor division within the next few months promising to research next generation beyond EUV manufacturing.
评论 #27446297 未加载
Rebelgecko将近 4 年前
Theres still some innuendos (like they don&#x27;t explicitly mention the redundancy of developing a second lunar lander), but I think there&#x27;s a good write-up of what the bill includes here- <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.commerce.senate.gov&#x2F;2021&#x2F;6&#x2F;chair-cantwell-statement-on-senate-passage-of-the-u-s-innovation-and-competition-act-and-nasa-authorization" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.commerce.senate.gov&#x2F;2021&#x2F;6&#x2F;chair-cantwell-statem...</a>
nickik将近 4 年前
These kinds of bills are so popular because every single person in the senate can put his own hobby horses into it.<p>BO additional money, money for Boeing in Mississippi and so on.
neonate将近 4 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;UnIqF" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;UnIqF</a>
ardme将近 4 年前
What exactly is in this bill and where is the money going? I&#x27;m having a very hard time researching this for some reason. Is there anything of interest to software technologists in there?
评论 #27444306 未加载
Shadonototro将近 4 年前
So they acknowledge china&#x27;s communism works better than their capitalism?
评论 #27448500 未加载
encryptluks2将近 4 年前
Now watch as they give that $250B away to government contractors who then spend the money to offer more useless services to sell to the government. They&#x27;d be better off investing $250B into education and changing the curriculum to focus on open source initiatives. At least China is good at sharing ideas, even if they supposedly steal them from other companies. The issue with tech innovation in the US isn&#x27;t that it needs more money, it is because it is a system designed around copyrights and proprietary BS that tends to attract the least innovation. Take Microsoft for example, they are now basically forced to adapt to Linux because their billions of dollars couldn&#x27;t compete against an open source solution.
评论 #27443708 未加载
评论 #27444487 未加载
评论 #27444074 未加载