TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Peer-to-peer serverless infrastructure, powered by blockchain technology

34 点作者 bigjump将近 4 年前

13 条评论

darren_将近 4 年前
So this appears to be a distributed network of random people&#x27;s devices, and the &#x27;blockchain&#x27; aspect is entirely unrelated to the actually useful parts of how the tech works. It&#x27;s just how people are paid for contributing their devices to the network?<p>Am I missing anything? Are the non-blockchain parts of this actually interesting?
评论 #27459609 未加载
评论 #27458996 未加载
New_California将近 4 年前
You lost me at &quot;blockchain&quot;.
评论 #27459075 未加载
评论 #27458870 未加载
fyskij将近 4 年前
&quot;How It Works&quot; link doesn&#x27;t work
评论 #27459545 未加载
评论 #27459015 未加载
ThePhysicist将近 4 年前
I was curious about their claims regarding confidential computing so I checked out their Github organization (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;edge" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;edge</a>), but it seems there&#x27;s very little activity there and there&#x27;s not a single reference to Intel SGX (the enclave they claim to use). So I&#x27;m a bit skeptical about their claims. SGX is also not a general-purpose technology and can only run highly specialized code, to my knowledge there&#x27;s currently no way to run general-purpose code that e.g. uses syscalls (there are some projects that try to fix this though).
评论 #27459561 未加载
评论 #27459427 未加载
oefrha将近 4 年前
Looking at the pricing page, this seems to be almost as expensive as AWS&#x2F;GCP, while having unknown performance characteristics of random people&#x27;s devices and network connections. Not sure why I would pay for this instead...
评论 #27459817 未加载
评论 #27459809 未加载
评论 #27459569 未加载
评论 #27459260 未加载
debarshri将近 4 年前
This is like pied piper from Silicon Valley series!<p>The new internet.
评论 #27459736 未加载
bko将近 4 年前
One thing I always look for in companies in the block chain space is the About section. I want to see real names and faces on these projects. The more information the better. Sometimes they just might have a front-man like a professor that wrote a white paper, but I want to see the people actually involved. This site has no about.<p>To confuse things further, there is another company called edge.app which is an app to buy and sell crypto. I don&#x27;t think they&#x27;re affiliated
Jenk将近 4 年前
From my rudimentary understanding (i.e., what I&#x27;ve just read on the homepage) I don&#x27;t know how &quot;blockchain&quot; fits into this, but I could make a guess that api signatures are &quot;blockchain verified&quot;?<p>From that same rudimentary understanding, I would also expect performance to be comparable to Tor.
评论 #27458839 未加载
评论 #27459618 未加载
debarshri将近 4 年前
I have been tracking new heroku style deployments tools, CDNs and ADN.<p>They are part of this new trend of platform calling themselves Application Delivery Network, wherein stateless (either containerized or microvm-ed) services are deployed closed to consumer.<p>That spaces is getting hyper-competitive and crowded. These guys are trying to differentiate themselves by calling themselves blockchain-powered network. To be honest, you do not have to be blockchain powered, it might just work against you as you might have to cross certain thresholds to serve content reliably. I rather prefer services and content delivered by datacenters that are certified and has some security standards than random devices in the network, unless they can somehow guarantee some standards on the devices.
hardwaresofton将近 4 年前
Some day, people will start treating their compute, everywhere as rentable commodity, and the price will go to almost zero. CPU + storage + network costs will go to zero, the &quot;edge&quot; will be everywhere, and organizing hosting and launching websites will never be the same. Maybe we&#x27;ll even get a better federated services out of all of it (if you get people comfortable with leasing their capital, maybe they get comfortable with running services for themselves with that capital other times).<p>This isn&#x27;t it for me (blockchain is an anchor around the neck of the idea IMO), but I look forward to the day that this idea finds it&#x27;s perfect (or perfectly timed) execution.
评论 #27460288 未加载
sschueller将近 4 年前
So IPFS with incentives to run a node?<p>One big issue I see with IPFS is that you or someone has to pin the content or it is gone for ever. This builds centralized services that offer pinning of your content.
评论 #27458923 未加载
评论 #27458914 未加载
评论 #27458946 未加载
fsflover将近 4 年前
See also: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.golem.network&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.golem.network&#x2F;</a>.
collyw将近 4 年前
Sounds like buzzword driven development