TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Kopia – Fast and Secure Open-Source Backup

176 点作者 chetangoti将近 4 年前

17 条评论

lucb1e将近 4 年前
Another one? Ten years ago I had trouble finding anything, then over time I learned of duplicity (2002?!¹), bup (2010), restic (2015), borg (2010)... all basically solving the same problem of encrypted incremental backups.<p>The landing page doesn&#x27;t mention why they made yet another solution. In the comments someone also mentions bvckup2. Is there an overview somewhere of all the different solutions? Any selling points here?<p>¹ That&#x27;s way older than I expected, but it&#x27;s also the first one I found and I stopped using it because it took many gigabytes on my then-250GB SSD for a local cache just to be able to do incremental backups. Maybe that&#x27;s why I had the feeling I couldn&#x27;t find anything good at the time.
评论 #27481474 未加载
评论 #27475980 未加载
评论 #27483898 未加载
评论 #27482623 未加载
评论 #27478344 未加载
klodolph将近 4 年前
I have been using Kopia for some time now after switching from Duplicity. Very happy with Kopia. You can just point Kopia at a GCS or S3 bucket and shove files there. Easy to restore files. You can list snapshots and files and do partial restores fairly easily. Old data gets expired on a timeline that you dictate.<p>Duplicity was a pain by comparison. I think Duplicity has a number of design flaws that become evident once you use it for a while.
z77dj3kl将近 4 年前
The only thing I need (and is sorely missing from Restic) is that the metadata be kept separate from the actual data. That way I can store the data in AWS S3 Deep Glacier at a cost of nothing per year, and still do incremental backups. Currently the architecture of Restic for instance requires all data to be quickly and cheaply accessible; which makes it impossible for this.<p>I have terabytes of data that I&#x27;d be happy to dump encrypted and compressed in Deep Glacier and happy to pay $500 to retrieve if I were to mess up my hard drives, but otherwise don&#x27;t want to pay for the costs of normal S3.<p>Does Kopia separate metadata from the actual encrypted&#x2F;compressed blobs?
评论 #27479708 未加载
评论 #27479637 未加载
przemub将近 4 年前
I love the new tendency to use Polish (and other languages&#x27;) names for programs!
评论 #27475771 未加载
评论 #27477714 未加载
评论 #27474719 未加载
gingerlime将近 4 年前
I wonder how it compares to restic or borg. Besides the gui anyway…
评论 #27474778 未加载
评论 #27477036 未加载
评论 #27474691 未加载
评论 #27476145 未加载
MikusR将近 4 年前
It has a gui and works on Linux&#x2F;Windows&#x2F;MacOS. Also has both deduplication and compression.
评论 #27475155 未加载
rkalla将近 4 年前
Any discussion about backup should always include a shout out to one of the most beautiful versions of this: bvckup2<p>About 10 years ago the founder just decided to start writing the most streamlined, beautiful pieces of software he could - obsession around NTFS nuances to improve performance and reduce overhead to an unbelievable degree.<p>10 years later, it&#x27;s still him (and maybe a few other folks) and the software is unbelievably polished.
评论 #27476164 未加载
评论 #27475928 未加载
评论 #27478839 未加载
vladgur将近 4 年前
I’m curious if this or other tools can help me with the following use case: I have a Synology network attached storage.<p>What I want is a way for me to incrementally back up to Synology when I’m on my local network&#x2F;VPN, while Synology maintains an encrypted cloud backup of my stuff. Alternatively when I’m outside of my network travelling, my laptop is backing up directly to the cloud with a way to sync that up with Synology.<p>In other words, I want to have a synchronized local and offline backup that works seamlessly whether I’m on my network or outside of it.<p>Is that a reasonable expectation? Does a tool like that exist?
评论 #27480315 未加载
forgotpwd16将近 4 年前
As a trivia, kopia means copy in Polish which is founder&#x27;s mother tongue.
评论 #27578870 未加载
kemonocode将近 4 年前
Interesting, I&#x27;d be willing to give it a try after I had to abandon Duplicati as it just seemed like a lost cause. Right now my backup setup consists on a UrBackup server my machines connect to, and a borg repository that is synced against the latest backup and then sent remotely to S3. It works, but could definitively use some streamlining...
encryptluks2将近 4 年前
Can I get some recent performance benchmarks vs restic? I only recently switched to restic and for the most part it is great (definitely an improvement from CrashPlan IMO), but it seems like this might actually have a few improvements to make it worth considering switching from restic.
评论 #27477028 未加载
AaronFriel将近 4 年前
How does this compare to Duplicacy in terms of throughput?
shaicoleman将近 4 年前
This looks really cool, and seems to tick all the boxes for me:<p>* Multi-platform<p>* Encrypted<p>* Compressed<p>* Deduplication<p>* Supports S3 Compatible + Backblaze B2<p>* Performant even with millions of small files<p>* Supports mounting<p>* Good usability<p>Wishlist:<p>* Automatic exclusion from .gitignore files<p>* Support nested includes&#x2F;excludes
tut-urut-utut将近 4 年前
Looks interesting. I always liked the borg concept, but never actually used it for backups because it lacks windows support and a nice gui.<p>Will give it a try.
评论 #27476254 未加载
评论 #27504019 未加载
xupybd将近 4 年前
Has anyone had experience with Kopia and restic?<p>If so any opinions?
37ef_ced3将近 4 年前
Use tarsnap instead: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.tarsnap.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.tarsnap.com&#x2F;</a>
foolinaround将近 4 年前
how would this type of software compare against Dropbox &#x2F; NextCloud?
评论 #27476767 未加载