TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Aging, Evolution and the "developmental drift"

12 点作者 mariorz将近 17 年前

3 条评论

biohacker42将近 17 年前
Crappy article, probably not HN worthy.<p>Besides, aging aka anti-cancer mechanisms, are often very much designed to work that way. Working on those mechanisms could increase longevity, however it will not cure aging.<p>We only have two copies of our DNA, and if you live long enough and cure every cancer, you could* still* end up with a left arm that genetically drifts from your right leg. And they both drift from your immune system.<p>Deinococcus radiodurans has 4 copies of its genome, but it's only a single cell. We'd need something like that but with a central place that decides what's you and what isn't <i>you</i>.<p>Think of it as RAID for your genome somewhere deep inside your chest. But we are nowhere near anything like that. So I wish the best of luck to Ray Kurtzweil and the rest of us, but I am not at all optimistic about the singularity.
评论 #276476 未加载
sungam将近 17 年前
This Cell paper was discussed previously on HN. I commented in detail on the paper in that thread:-<p><a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=256355" rel="nofollow">http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=256355</a>
stcredzero将近 17 年前
What about us isn't an accident of evolution?
评论 #276436 未加载