TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Apple's TV Strategy

19 点作者 ckurdziel将近 14 年前

7 条评论

padobson将近 14 年前
The problem with the TV is not the user experience, it's the content.<p>Right now, content creators have created an environment that is 10 times more complex and legally difficult to penetrate than anything the music industry did - and they're successfully defending this position against everyone, including Apple.<p>Television should be an experience where I can watch exactly what I want to watch, exactly when I want to watch it. No commercial interruptions, no content I feel 'meh' about. When I know what I want to watch, I should be able to select it and watch it on my terms. This should apply to new content in the same way Netflix is currently doing reruns.<p>Furthermore, when I don't know exactly what I want to watch, there should be a Pandora like system that creates a channel for me that will give me something I am probably going to like.<p>I should be able to know what my friends and people I find interesting think about what I'm watching. This should not, in any way, intrude on the watching experience, but it should never be more than glance or a remote tap away.<p>Finally, this entire experience should cost less than a cable subscription.<p>The technology is there. I could build this experience for myself using BDs, iTunes, DVR, a media server, and by programming a bunch of TV apps for something like Vizio, Samsung, or GoogleTV.<p>However, without the backing of content providers, something like this will never make it mass market because they are holding all the cards until a giant, like Apple, decides to take them on - and it'll be far more bloody than the battle for music.
评论 #2764805 未加载
评论 #2764830 未加载
评论 #2764889 未加载
xsmasher将近 14 年前
TV programming is ripe for an iPod/iTunes style disruption - Netflix is doing it now with streaming - but it'll be hard to get people to buy a whole new TV.<p>The iPod had a simple selling point - all your songs in your pocket - and it only had to displace cassette/CD Walkmen that wore out in a year anyway. Ditto for the iPhone - internet in your pocket, but this instead of your next phone upgrade.<p>TV is harder. What's the selling point for an Apple-branded TV, and is it enough to make me buy a new TV now instead of 5-10 years when mine wears out?
mcphilip将近 14 年前
All I got from this article was that Apple has enough cash on hand to enter the market if it wants to. Nothing much about strategy...<p>iPod, iPhone, and iPad are all portable products that can be used in a wide variety of contexts, but a TV is only used in a single location. Unless Apple can come up with some revolutionary new ways to use a TV to consume media, I'd be surprised if consumers are willing to pay a premium for an Apple TV product that has limited utility compared with the portable product lines.
forgottenpaswrd将近 14 年前
I believe there is a tremendous potential for disruption on TV, the same way anybody can make a living selling software using Internet, anybody should be able to sell their documentary, films, or TV episodes using it without too much middlemen.<p>It is already happening, but it will take some years, bandwidth has to be cheaper and the economic models have to be tested.<p>Remember Apple App Store learned a lot from Lindows-Linspire click and run, apt-get, yum and other experiments that tested software distribution in the millions of users way before Apple did.
protomyth将近 14 年前
If Apple TV gets its own app store, then it will be interesting to see all the channels (apps) that will result. I think that is more likely than an actual TV (unless you are willing to call a big iMac a TV). I think the biggest limit on Apple TV is the bandwidth caps.
评论 #2765059 未加载
programminggeek将近 14 年前
I think the reason the Apple TV isn't as disruptive or genius is that I don't believe that Steve Jobs watches much if any TV. He is a busy man running a Fortune 500 company. Do you think he spends a bunch of free time on his couch watching TV?<p>Apple products are great in part because Steve Jobs and other executives use them and so they make sure they are top tier.<p>Apple TV is a "hobby" because the people signing off on them don't have the same deep understanding of the TV watching experience that they do the phone experience or the desktop/laptop computer experience.<p>For example, for the longest time the Apple TV was where you could watch YouTube and movies you download from Apple. No DVD drive, no Netflix, no Hulu, no DVR, no game console. YouTube and iTunes purchases. That is not what a couch potato would design.<p>A couch potato would design something like a cross between the current Apple TV and the Wii or something. Streaming content + downloadable music/movies + casual games all running iOS. Make the Apple TV interface with the iPod Touch, iPhone, or Wiimote and you're basically there.<p>Again, if Steve Jobs were a TV junkie this might seem obvious to him, but I don't think he is so it probably isn't going to happen.
评论 #2764681 未加载
评论 #2765192 未加载
评论 #2764636 未加载
评论 #2765028 未加载
评论 #2765203 未加载
评论 #2765202 未加载
reecepacheco将近 14 年前
yeah... Dixon is dead on.<p>leave it to the naysayers to say "it's impossible."<p>Jobs will dominate and prove them wrong.