TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

America’s 50 Largest Inherited-Wealth Dynasties Accelerate Inequality

62 点作者 bengtan将近 4 年前

5 条评论

ppf将近 4 年前
&gt;Dynastic families have seen their wealth grow significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic<p>&gt;Dynastically wealthy families wield a great deal of political power, and use it to further their interests.<p>I&#x27;ve been saying this pretty much since the start of lockdowns and restrictions. For the past year, we have essentially legislated the transfer of more power and wealth to those already wealthy and powerful. When the dust starts to settle, it will become clearer just how much has changed, and maybe the theoretical questions of &quot;was this worth it&quot;? will become more practical.
评论 #27652191 未加载
评论 #27654443 未加载
DrNosferatu将近 4 年前
Laudable goals and action points - for which I would vote. Already, if nothing more, raising awareness is a positive outcome of this initiative.<p>*However*, I guess it is easy to agree that the prescribed policies would face huge political opposition in attempts to implement them. Look at what happened to Bernie&#x27;s campaign! (Unless, of course, something majeur &#x2F; extraordinary circumstances - like the Pandemic - are invoked to pass such a policy package in one clean swoop).<p>Being it so, how about considering a simpler, less contentious, parallel alternative - a bypass around the mighty legal loopholes, media &amp; lobby opposition?<p>That would be *the creation of Citizen&#x27;s Wealth Fund*. Just like Norway&#x27;s Oil Fund. But instead of oil, the asset would be *the bailed out stocks*. In other words, in the &quot;bailout action&quot;, the State buys stock, then the State would keep said stock in the fund. Extendable to 5G auction proceeds, other licenses, etc.<p>best explanation, also longer read, the 208 page book: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;angrynomics.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;angrynomics.com&#x2F;</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ippr.org&#x2F;media-item&#x2F;watch-a-citizens-wealth-fund-explained" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ippr.org&#x2F;media-item&#x2F;watch-a-citizens-wealth-fund...</a> <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;rC9RAylrl0s" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;rC9RAylrl0s</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Sovereign_wealth_fund" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Sovereign_wealth_fund</a>
评论 #27650922 未加载
dagw将近 4 年前
Of the 10 richest people in Sweden, you have 1 company founder, 1 hedge fund manager and 8 people who directly or indirectly inherited their wealth, 4 of whom belong to the same family. This is hardly unique to the US
评论 #27651024 未加载
评论 #27652685 未加载
ChuckNorris89将近 4 年前
That&#x27;s cute compared to Europe where for example in Austria, the top 50 wealthiest families own a third of the country&#x27;s wealth.
评论 #27652209 未加载
prometheus76将近 4 年前
Pareto Distribution makes people angry. Film at 11.
评论 #27659723 未加载