TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Yes, We Want Cryptographic Protection for Email

54 点作者 nwalfield将近 4 年前

1 comment

aborsy将近 4 年前
Thank you for this well written informative article!<p>I have a few of questions.<p>1. There was work in progress to update the OpenPGP protocol, eg, RFC 4880bis. What’s the status of this draft? When can users expect AEAD from OpenPGP?<p>Some of the criticisms of PGP are lack of modern authentication, lack of forward secrecy, and limited usability.<p>FS is probably not relevant to email that involves long-term storage. UX is out of scope of protocol. AEAD however is expected these days. MDC isn’t modern authentication.<p>2. Is PGP currently effective against powerful adversaries?<p>3. What do you think of claims that sequoia is an interesting project in a doomed echo system?
评论 #27685529 未加载
评论 #27683129 未加载