Slightly more info by following this link:<p><a href="http://allthingsd.com/20110715/itc-rules-htc-violated-two-apple-patents/?refcat=news" rel="nofollow">http://allthingsd.com/20110715/itc-rules-htc-violated-two-ap...</a><p>Patents in question:<p><a href="http://www.google.com/patents/about/5946647_System_and_method_for_performing.html?id=aFEWAAAAEBAJ" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/patents/about/5946647_System_and_metho...</a><p><a href="http://www.google.com/patents?id=nCYJAAAAEBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=6,343,263&hl=en&ei=3rUgTojDCtHXiAKxsaTOAw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCgQ6AEwAA" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/patents?id=nCYJAAAAEBAJ&printsec=f...</a><p>Are both of these really as obscenely broad and all-encompassing as they look? WTF, USA?