TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Online Anonymity (Updated to v0.9.8)

80 点作者 anonypla将近 4 年前

6 条评论

anonypla将近 4 年前
Disclaimer: I'm the maintainer/writer of the guide and I would appreciate any opinion, suggestion, criticism (even harsh criticism) from the HN community. Feel free to point out any inaccuracies or errors if you spot any. It would be more than welcome. Obviously, I don't want to spread misinformation or inaccuracies. I also know my guide was posted before by someone else but unfortunately not by me and I completely missed that post. It was significantly updated since then.
评论 #27733281 未加载
评论 #27733251 未加载
theden将近 4 年前
Nice guide, this is like a platonic ideal of anonymity we&#x27;d like to have but never will.<p>Years of using FB when I was younger, general lapses in judgement or overlooks in privacy when in tense or pressing situations, compromises I&#x27;ve made in using services with certain people or jobs, many regretful apps or purchases and sign ups, years of my email and phone number shared to 3rd parties, I could go on...<p>And that&#x27;s just the data I&#x27;ve shared knowingly, mostly due to the social contract when functioning in certain groups. The odds are stacked up against an individual.<p>The reason I mentioned that it&#x27;s a platonic ideal is because it takes a lot of education and experience for one to even _know_ how to be anonymous—we&#x27;re not born a priori with an understanding of privacy wrt technology, and we don&#x27;t learn about tech privacy early say compared to privacy in the physical world. Maybe older folk that were wise to all of these violations as they became prevalent, but younger people are already profiled and marketed to before they understand any of these concepts—it&#x27;s so dire. I think an approach that may work is for the blocking and scrubbing to be on the hardware and software vendors level with privacy-options baked in and set as default. A given, sort of like how you expect a bathroom stall to be private.<p>Another solution, assuming we can&#x27;t escape being tracked, would be to weaponise our data with tools like trackmenot[0] and adnauseam[1].<p>1. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;trackmenot.io" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;trackmenot.io</a><p>2. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;adnauseam.io" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;adnauseam.io</a>
Syonyk将近 4 年前
<i>sigh</i> The reminder that, no matter how paranoid you think you are, there&#x27;s always something you&#x27;ve missed.<p>Always a good read, I&#x27;ll see if I find anything in particular that stands out as lacking or wrong!
评论 #27733261 未加载
uyt将近 4 年前
I know stylometry is a thing, but is it good enough to fingerprint you according to what you know or talk about? What about in the future as NLP advances?<p>For a historic example, &#x27;...although Newton&#x27;s solution was anonymous, he was recognized by Bernoulli as its author; &quot;tanquam ex ungue leonem&quot; (we recognize the lion by his claw).&#x27; <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Later_life_of_Isaac_Newton#Bernoulli&#x27;s_mathematical_challenge" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Later_life_of_Isaac_Newton#Ber...</a> I am guessing the proof techniques were so hard&#x2F;original that Bernoulli concluded only Newton could&#x27;ve come up with it at that time.<p>Likewise, I would assume there&#x27;s only a handful of people in the world who have this level of expertise on online anonymity. So do you then have to keep this expertise completely isolate to one particular anonymous account to avoid being correlated?<p>My concern applies to knowledge that isn&#x27;t particularly world class too, as long as it&#x27;s in a unique combination. I guess in some sense what we know makes us who we are so it&#x27;s hard to avoid being &quot;identified&quot; that way without splitting your personality?
评论 #27733491 未加载
DoreenMichele将近 4 年前
<i>What if you want to let someone you trust (friends, family, lawyers, journalists …) that you are in trouble and they should look out for you?</i><p>I think you left out the word <i>know</i> from the above paragraph.<p>For a lot of people, their biggest threats will be personal relationships: an abusive relative or ex, someone they are currently divorcing. That seems to not make your threat assessment chart and I don&#x27;t know if that&#x27;s a good thing or not.
评论 #27733592 未加载
CA0DA将近 4 年前
check out <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.inteltechniques.com&#x2F;podcast.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.inteltechniques.com&#x2F;podcast.html</a>
评论 #27733393 未加载