TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ardour -Audacity Alternative to Record, Edit, and Mix on Linux, OS X and Windows

131 点作者 noyesno将近 4 年前

15 条评论

_joel将近 4 年前
Ardour is a different tool to Audacity, it's meant to be used as a full on DAW, rather than just recording/editing audio.
评论 #27741879 未加载
评论 #27742223 未加载
ratww将近 4 年前
As someone that worked in this area, IMO, the difference between DAWs and modern audio editors (especially a complete one like Audacity) is massively overstated.<p>DAWs make fine audio editors for 99% of cases. The non-destructive workflow might even be simpler to most people.<p>For recording a DAW is IMO a better option, since it&#x27;s battle tested in critical environments where super-low latency and rock solid stability is non negotiable.<p>On the other hand, modern audio editors like Audacity already have lots of complex features: complete multitrack recording, plugins, automation, so it&#x27;s not as if the complexity difference is that big. Honestly, someone used to edit Audio on a DAW would also have a hard time picking up Audacity too, since it&#x27;s complex on its own as well.<p>If it were SoundForge vs ProTools 15 or 20 years ago I&#x27;d definitely agree that one is not an alternative to the other, but Audacity vs any DAW today? Yeah you can replace it without much difficulty.
评论 #27742366 未加载
zxzax将近 4 年前
I&#x27;m saddened that it&#x27;s necessary to bother posting this, but Ardour also has a similar privacy policy, which you should read if you intend to use their services: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ardour.org&#x2F;privacy.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ardour.org&#x2F;privacy.html</a><p>Ardour also has a compile time optional &quot;phone home&quot; feature which checks for update announcements, so you should disable that when building if you care about this sort of thing: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;Ardour&#x2F;ardour&#x2F;blob&#x2F;13f5fb3dee640f0bfb1d669183b36c54146c6918&#x2F;wscript#L862" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;Ardour&#x2F;ardour&#x2F;blob&#x2F;13f5fb3dee640f0bfb1d66...</a><p>Personal note: I do not consider these things to be issues with Ardour, or with Audacity. I commend PaulDavisThe1st and x42 and the rest of the Ardour contributors, as well as the Audacity developers, for their respective work on these two excellent projects.
评论 #27742244 未加载
评论 #27743274 未加载
mortenjorck将近 4 年前
Ardour is an alternative to Audacity like Xcode is an alternative to TextEdit.
评论 #27742336 未加载
jessaustin将近 4 年前
I&#x27;ve been using SoX [0] to edit my ringtones and other simple audio files. CLI FTW! Not only can you start, stop, and splice at precisely the right time, but you can adjust tempo, compress and expand dynamic range, all sorts of other things that don&#x27;t create audio but make it sound better.<p>[0] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;sox.sourceforge.net&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;sox.sourceforge.net&#x2F;</a>
评论 #27742381 未加载
theproffesor将近 4 年前
imo ardour is a bit heavy as an audacity replacement, and I am a huge fan of ardour. I have been using ocenaudio with very good success and do think that it is a much closer &quot;replacement&quot;... with that said ardor is the best linux DAW!
rcakebread将近 4 年前
AudioMass is very similar to Audacity, is open source[1] and browser based. Check out the online version[2].<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;pkalogiros&#x2F;audiomass" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;pkalogiros&#x2F;audiomass</a> [2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;audiomass.co&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;audiomass.co&#x2F;</a>
评论 #27742803 未加载
ttctciyf将近 4 年前
Looks like they released 6.8 a couple of days ago[1] with some significant fixes[2]!<p>I wouldn&#x27;t really call it an audacity alternative, though - you&#x27;d be dealing with a bunch of additional complexity to simply accomplish what most folks use audacity for I think.<p>1: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;discourse.ardour.org&#x2F;t&#x2F;ardour-6-8-released&#x2F;106136" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;discourse.ardour.org&#x2F;t&#x2F;ardour-6-8-released&#x2F;106136</a><p>2: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ardour.org&#x2F;whatsnew.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ardour.org&#x2F;whatsnew.html</a>
IndySun将近 4 年前
This is useful. Not technically multitrack or an exact replacement for Audacity. It gives great info on the audio, records, and its interface is super slick.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ocenaudio.com&#x2F;download" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ocenaudio.com&#x2F;download</a>
mrlinx将近 4 年前
I wish there was a similar alternative to virtualdub.
评论 #27742426 未加载
noobermin将近 4 年前
Does anyone use Ardour for their audio work? Always heard great things about it.
gebt将近 4 年前
Stay safe, stay free.
underseacables将近 4 年前
Alas, Audacity is free.
评论 #27741986 未加载
mat0将近 4 年前
Why would anyone replace Audacity? Just because they are trying to get some data? Audacity is fine
评论 #27742060 未加载
评论 #27741987 未加载
评论 #27742031 未加载
评论 #27742092 未加载
评论 #27742124 未加载
defensem3ch将近 4 年前
Ardour isn&#x27;t free. You need to pay for it, unless you build it yourself, or you only want a demo version
评论 #27741787 未加载
评论 #27742073 未加载