TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

A Mercury Colony?

77 点作者 drocer88将近 4 年前

11 条评论

lmilcin将近 4 年前
It kinda forgets one very small detail.<p>Getting there is requires almost twice as much delta v as to Mars or Venus. Also, since you are going deep into Sun&#x27;s gravity well, getting from there to practically anywhere is going to be very expensive. Setting a base on Mars actually helps further colonization as you are setting further from Sun on a planet with less gravity.<p>Though my understanding is that future of space exploration is going to be swarms of robotic factories that can replicate itself from minerals from asteroids.
评论 #27745951 未加载
评论 #27745659 未加载
javajosh将近 4 年前
If you want an insurance policy against a large asteroid strike, then the best bet would still be on Earth - but perhaps deep under the ocean, or deep underground. The arguments for this project (and against) are largely the same (e.g. it&#x27;s not likely to be economically viable because of trade).<p>Space is for robots. Earth is for life.
评论 #27745908 未加载
评论 #27746821 未加载
mattowen_uk将近 4 年前
FYI, Kim Stanley Robinson&#x27;s book &#x27;2312&#x27;[1] has a large chunk of the story set on Mercury - with a novel concept for the colony. (Small story spoilers in the link below)<p>---<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;2312_(novel)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;2312_(novel)</a>
评论 #27756038 未加载
8bitsrule将近 4 年前
Discussion from 8 years back: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=5734333" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=5734333</a><p>UniverseToday 2016: &quot;How Do We Terraform Mercury?&quot; [<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.universetoday.com&#x2F;128531&#x2F;terraform-mercury&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.universetoday.com&#x2F;128531&#x2F;terraform-mercury&#x2F;</a>]
exporectomy将近 4 年前
&quot;us humans will consume the Earth&#x27;s non-renewable energy and mineral resources almost completely within the next 50-100 years, severely reducing our discretionary income for costly activities such as space travel.&quot;<p>I know this is an old article. Perhaps written in the hype of peak-oil days or something like that.
评论 #27745456 未加载
评论 #27747957 未加载
axilmar将近 4 年前
Wouldn&#x27;t the money spent for such an operation be better spent in asteroid defense? it would be a lot cheaper as well.
gorgoiler将近 4 年前
Are there fundamental limits to mechanical reliability?<p>Towards the end the article talks about how the initial startup period for the colony will be the hardest.<p>If the startup process were automated, no one would be at risk. Send the first colonists once the tomatoes are ripe. But is there a practical limit on how much can be automated, remotely?<p>Are we approaching (or have we already passed?) a singularity in the human race based on our ability to product fault tolerant ball race bearings and machine screws that never snap?
评论 #27746282 未加载
surajcm将近 4 年前
Is the chances of mercury hit by an asteroid is higher than that of Earth ? It seems so, as it is close to sun.
评论 #27745479 未加载
评论 #27745229 未加载
nickserv将近 4 年前
It doesn&#x27;t make for a very pleasant life, stuck underground on a planet with no atmosphere.<p>Better to strip mine Mercury and use the metals for building a Dyson swarm.
sMarsIntruder将近 4 年前
Is there a TL;DR version?
akomtu将近 4 年前
The best way to live on Mercury is to become some sort of etheric creature that&#x27;s not affected by the brutal radiation there.