TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Analysis of Covid-19 vaccine death reports from VAERS

43 点作者 johntfella将近 4 年前

7 条评论

ck2将近 4 年前
They think they&#x27;ve figured out why some people clot now:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nature.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;s41586-021-03744-4" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nature.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;s41586-021-03744-4</a><p>But there&#x27;s always going to be risks of complications and reaction.<p>What bothers me is instead of developing a test to determine who is at risk &quot;science&quot; and &quot;policy makers&quot; write it off as &quot;well only a very very tiny percent of people will have a reaction&#x2F;death so it&#x27;s acceptable&quot;.<p>Well no, not really acceptable if you are that 1% (I happen to be one of the 1% with very bad reaction for months now, trust me you feel like someone has let down your entire life by not looking out for your situation and writing you off as expendable while hand-waiving it&#x27;s all going to be okay).<p>There were reactions with the original SARS vaccines too, there is always a risk group but never a test developed to predict who is at risk:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;journals.plos.org&#x2F;plosone&#x2F;article?id=10.1371&#x2F;journal.pone.0035421" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;journals.plos.org&#x2F;plosone&#x2F;article?id=10.1371&#x2F;journal...</a>
评论 #27799132 未加载
评论 #27797936 未加载
评论 #27798869 未加载
scotty79将近 4 年前
&gt; there were only 14% of the cases for which a vaccine reaction could be ruled out as a contributing factor in their death.<p>They should take same number of deaths in similarly old and sickly population reported after different vaccine and compare if they can rule out covid vaccine as the factor contributing to demise in people who never took covid vaccine.
评论 #27803689 未加载
ipspam将近 4 年前
It&#x27;s pretty hard to make a case against VAERs when everyone that died WITH Covid was ruled a Covid death.<p>Applying the same fear mongering rules to the Vaccine is where we are now.<p>Take out 90ish% of the Covid deaths, and the pandemic isnt serious, nor are the vaccine reactions.<p>Keep the VAERs and the current Covid accounting and nobody under 18 should be vaccinated. 18-30 is unknown. 30+ should probably still be vaxxed.<p>The propoganda monster has swallowed its own tale
评论 #27798041 未加载
joe-collins将近 4 年前
Data points:<p>• <i>This interim analysis covers only 250 deaths</i>, out of 1644 in the set. The majority were reported by healthcare professionals.<p>• In 5% (13&#x2F;250 cases), vaccine was most likely cause of death.<p>• In 14%, vaccine was ruled out.<p>• In the remainder, the vaccine remains plausible.<p>• <i>However</i>, &quot;the sample is heavily biased because these were all people vaccinated very early in the programme when only the elderly, those with significant or chronic health conditions and frontline health service staff were being vaccinated.&quot;
alea_iacta_est将近 4 年前
From December 2020 to April 2021:<p>1644 deaths and 28,000 serious adverse events.<p>On the credibility of the sources for the VAERS database:<p>&quot;We identified health service employees as the reporter in at least 67% of the reports, while pharmaceutical employees were identified as the reporter in a further 5%. Lay people were identifiable as the reporter in only 28% of the reports.&quot;
slumdev将近 4 年前
VAERS has logged another 4,000-ish deaths since April 2021. Scary to think only 14% of those aren&#x27;t a result of the vaccine.
kaminar将近 4 年前
The number is well over 6000 deaths...where are you getting 1644? Any death is wrongful, and the poisonous jabs are causing more than just deaths.
评论 #27800241 未加载
评论 #27800271 未加载