TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Approved fracking compounds can form PFAS a.k.a. “forever chemicals”

116 点作者 abawany将近 4 年前

6 条评论

threatofrain将近 4 年前
&gt; In recent days, whistle-blowers have alleged in the Intercept that the E.P.A. office in charge of reviewing toxic chemicals tampered with the assessments of dozens of chemicals to make them appear safer. [1]<p>&gt; E.P.A. scientists evaluating new chemicals “are the last line of defense between harmful — even deadly — chemicals and their introduction into U.S. commerce, and this line of defense is struggling to maintain its integrity,” the whistle-blowers said in their disclosure, which was released by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, a Maryland-based nonprofit group.<p>[1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;theintercept.com&#x2F;2021&#x2F;07&#x2F;02&#x2F;epa-chemical-safety-corruption-whistleblowers&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;theintercept.com&#x2F;2021&#x2F;07&#x2F;02&#x2F;epa-chemical-safety-corr...</a>
评论 #27816731 未加载
woeirua将近 4 年前
I&#x27;m not nearly as worried about fracking when it comes to PFAS&#x2F;PFOAs as I am about airports. It is well documented, that airports (especially military ones) have used PFAS&#x2F;PFOAs as firefighting agents for years and years. If you live near an airport, you should not be drinking groundwater. If you absolutely must, then get it tested!
评论 #27817768 未加载
评论 #27819194 未加载
评论 #27817574 未加载
评论 #27817418 未加载
diplodocusaur将近 4 年前
Question: How is a &quot;forever chemical&quot; different from any other chemical?<p>Google search:<p>&gt; &quot;PFAS are commonly referred to as “forever chemicals”&quot;<p>Google search:<p>&gt; PFAS = Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances<p>Wikipedia entry, &#x27;environmental concerns&#x27; section:<p>&gt; In 2009, PFASs were listed as persistent organic pollutants (POPs) under the Stockholm Convention [1], due to their ubiquitous, persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic nature.<p>&gt; The nickname was derived by combining the two dominant attributes of this class of chemicals:<p>&gt; 1) PFAS chemicals are characterized by a carbon-fluorine (C-F) backbone (the &quot;F-C&quot; in &quot;Forever Chemicals&quot;); and<p>&gt; 2) the carbon fluorine bond is one of the strongest bonds in organic chemistry, which gives these chemicals an extremely long environmental half-life<p>Wikipedia entry, Fluorine, PFAS mention:<p>&gt; Dwell time in the body varies greatly by species, with half-lives of days in rodents, and years in humans.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Stockholm_Convention_on_Persistent_Organic_Pollutants" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Stockholm_Convention_on_Persis...</a>
评论 #27820093 未加载
kleton将近 4 年前
Maybe microbes will evolve to get better at reductive defluorination. Microbes that can use chlorinated solvents as terminal electron acceptors are pretty widespread. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sci-hub.se&#x2F;10.1021&#x2F;acs.est.0c04483" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sci-hub.se&#x2F;10.1021&#x2F;acs.est.0c04483</a>
humaniania将近 4 年前
And where does all that contaminated waste water go?
评论 #27816862 未加载
评论 #27817745 未加载
评论 #27817591 未加载
encryptluks2将近 4 年前
Isn&#x27;t Biden responsible for the EPA? Seems like something Bernie would have had a lot more to say about.
评论 #27816969 未加载