TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Work for post-materialists

104 点作者 bsaunder将近 14 年前

12 条评论

Produce将近 14 年前
&#62;But it would be truly pathetic if the legal/economic organisation of our society was optimised for government surveillance and tax collection and not for the exercise of autonomy in pursuit of a meaningful life.<p>Unfortunately, it already is. Bureaucracy is essentially an approach where the 'server' (government/business/whatever) forces the 'clients' (individuals/employees) to change their behavior for the benefit of the 'server', with no clear benefit for the 'clients'. When considering it in these terms, words like 'oppressive' seem to have some significance. After all, the definition of the word is:<p>&#62;Oppression is the exercise of authority or power in a burdensome, cruel, or unjust manner.<p>In the case of bureaucracy, the 'burdensome' and, arguably, 'unjust' components of the definition are fitting.<p>Either way, it's inspiring to see these issues finally being discussed in mainstream mediums.
评论 #2786563 未加载
euroclydon将近 14 年前
When writing software, the goal is often to take some task which a human once did manually, and to partially or completely automate it. I automate as much of my daily work-flow as possible. If I could, I would automate myself right out of writing software all together.<p>I think this attitude explains why I loath the employee-employer fixed pay relationship so much. Selling your time, day-in, day-out, to write software, is antithetical to the very act of writing software, because, as the developer, you haven’t automated yourself out of any future work.
评论 #2785498 未加载
评论 #2789485 未加载
purplefruit将近 14 年前
I ironically used to work for McKinsey and was among their top performers, then I dropped out of the rat race and have been doing just enough freelance work to stay afloat. I didn't know there was a term for my type, but "threshold earner" gives me a sense of legitimacy. I like it.
MaxGabriel将近 14 年前
I guess I don't read the economist blogs as much, but this article has a <i>completely</i> different feel from their magazine: much more laid back and curious, if a little rambling. Its a nice change, though
评论 #2786179 未加载
zipdog将近 14 年前
The last paragraph ties into business models like AirBnb and UberCab: where people just do some work or offer something and get paid for it, without a lot of red tape and hassles and registering as a business.<p>It would be great if business and labor laws were streamlined to make this as easy as possible, but its disruptive to larger corporations and current stakeholders, so I suspect there's vested interest in trying to keep the status quo, unfortunately. But the success of AirBnb, etc is a great sign.
评论 #2786598 未加载
评论 #2788758 未加载
joelhaus将近 14 年前
My brother likes to say that America is an adolescent, while Europe is the adult. According to the article, it sounds like the America is growing up and it's manifesting as a desire for job autonomy in the labor market.<p>However, the author misses an important link between job autonomy and the question posed, <i>"What is the single best thing Washington can do to jumpstart job creation?"</i>...<p>The fundamental reason that "job autonomy" is more viable today, is thanks to the internet and free-flowing information. If there is one thing the government could do to jumpstart job creation, it would be to improve the regulatory structure surrounding the internet, bust the monopolies that are gouging us for awful service and give incentives for startup ISP's to take their place.
euroclydon将近 14 年前
Mark Mills writing is a tad more jocular and Wall-Streety than a good HN article's level of nuance, but he has some very good insight into American and Chinese manufacturing and employment levels in this Forbes article:<p><a href="http://blogs.forbes.com/markpmills/2011/07/05/manufacturing-3d-printing-and-what-china-knows-about-the-emerging-american-century/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.forbes.com/markpmills/2011/07/05/manufacturing-...</a>
gruseom将近 14 年前
<i>David Ellerman [...] argues that the employer-employee relationship is more like the master-slave relationship than we are inclined to believe.</i><p>Me too! (<a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1287346" rel="nofollow">http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1287346</a>) I've never heard of David Ellerman. Anybody here read him?
iwwr将近 14 年前
What is 'post-materialism'? Any relationship to post-scarcity economics?
评论 #2785361 未加载
评论 #2785829 未加载
fleitz将近 14 年前
""The country is ready for the five day week. It is bound to come through all industry. In adopting it ourselves, we are putting it into effect in about fifty industries, for we are coal miners, iron miners, lumbermen, and so on. The short week is bound to come, because without it the country will not be able to absorb its production and stay prosperous.<p>"The harder we crowd business for time, the more efficient it becomes. The more well-paid leisure workmen get, the greater become their wants. These wants soon become needs. Well-managed business pays high wages and sells at low prices. Its workmen have the leisure to enjoy life and the wherewithal with which to finance that enjoyment.<p>"The industry of this country could not long exist if factories generally went back to the ten hour day, because the people would not have the time to consume the goods produced. For instance, a workman would have little use for an automobile if he had to be in the shops from dawn until dusk. And that would react in countless directions, for the automobile, by enabling people to get about quickly and easily, gives them a chance to find out what is going on in the world-which leads them to a larger life that requires more food, more and better goods, more books, more music -- more of everything. The benefits of travel are not confined to those who can take an expensive foreign trip. There is more to learn in this country than there is abroad."<p><a href="http://www.worklessparty.org/timework/ford.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.worklessparty.org/timework/ford.htm</a><p>Henry Ford knew the answer 90 years ago, the key to keeping consumption up is to give people time to spend it. Think about it this way, a 5 day work week is 25% longer than a 4 day work week but most importantly gives people 50% more leisure time. During this leisure time people will consume more. Transitioning to a 4 day work week (with 5 days pay) would result in 50% more time to consume and would eliminate unemployment almost immediately.<p>The best thing the government could do to solve unemployment problems is to make a 4 day work week standard and institute overtime for the 5th day. The reality of the situation is that large numbers of unemployed people lead to instability in the political realm.
评论 #2789885 未加载
Hisoka将近 14 年前
I think once you're in a certain income level, it doesn't matter how much more you make... until you hit that next income level. As long as you meeting your survival needs, and not stressing out (live paycheck by paycheck), and of course don't have a disease/illness, then it doesn't matter if you make $80K, or $200K, or even $400K/year... it's not until you hit the million dollar mark where things get interesting. That's when you have financial freedom, and options open up. So I agree with the threshold thing to an extent.
评论 #2786065 未加载
评论 #2785789 未加载
评论 #2786632 未加载
known将近 14 年前
I believe the primary responsibility of any govt is to create jobs in the society.
评论 #2786100 未加载