TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Square Banking

321 点作者 elvinyung将近 4 年前

31 条评论

danpalmer将近 4 年前
It&#x27;s amazing to me how much of a better product can be created when everything is in one place.<p>It&#x27;s obvious that when you&#x27;re charging customers and paying invoices through the same interface, that you&#x27;ll have more visibility on your cash flow and it&#x27;ll generally be easier to use, but this goes so much further.<p>The reason those loans are easy is because Square know your history of charging customers. The reason they can pay &quot;instantly&quot; into your account is because they don&#x27;t have to actually move any money until you pay out of your account, the reason they can charge no account fees is because they&#x27;re charging at the point of taking payments from customers.<p>The economics of the whole offering are far different to what the regular combo of payment service provider + bank + loan company can provide.<p>Great move. Square has always been the sort of product that makes me wish I was in a business where I could use it.
评论 #27895001 未加载
评论 #27895886 未加载
评论 #27897406 未加载
评论 #27897742 未加载
评论 #27897320 未加载
dm8将近 4 年前
0 overdraft fees. Yay. More like it. It will force major banks to rethink their overdraft fees as a revenue center. As someone who was not so well financially just a decade ago, overdraft fees seemed like penalty for being poor. When you are living paycheck to paycheck, you never know when your account will get overdrawn. And most evil thing was - bank will deny the charge because you didn’t have enough funds but will still charge you for $34 fee.<p>Some banks offer overdraft protection but it’s not obvious in lot of banking websites&#x2F;apps in my experience and has been recent development. Plus - lot of people don’t understand the concept of overdrafts. They assume bank will deny if your account doesn’t have enough funds.<p>I’m surprised congress didn’t take action on overdraft fees as it mostly affects middle class and poor people.
评论 #27895231 未加载
评论 #27894835 未加载
评论 #27898579 未加载
评论 #27898282 未加载
评论 #27897370 未加载
评论 #27894568 未加载
评论 #27895270 未加载
评论 #27896384 未加载
mario_lopez将近 4 年前
I think we really have to take a step back away from this annoying scrolling &#x2F; auto-moving element behavior for product info pages. I had a moment where my mouse was chasing a moving &#x27;Loans&#x27; tile.
评论 #27893874 未加载
评论 #27894810 未加载
评论 #27894070 未加载
pdpi将近 4 年前
This was the &quot;Aha!&quot; part for me:<p>&gt; Get a customized offer based on your card sales through Square, and then choose your loan size.<p>and then a bit further down:<p>&gt; Repay it automatically with a percentage of your daily card sales through Square.<p>Such an incredibly obvious idea in hindsight. While I can see why putting all your eggs in one basket like this can pose something of a problem, there&#x27;s no denying this level of integration is amazing for a small business.
评论 #27896568 未加载
评论 #27896257 未加载
bingdig将近 4 年前
2021 is a great time to own a small regional &#x2F; community bank. All the mature FinTech companies are trying to buy a bank to expedite the cumbersome bank chartering process (+ mortgage origination and servicing companies are too)
评论 #27894997 未加载
评论 #27895379 未加载
duxup将近 4 年前
&gt;Square Banking<p>&gt;Square, Inc. is a financial services company, not a bank. Banking services are provided by Square’s banking affiliate, Square Financial Services, Inc. or Sutton Bank; Members FDIC.<p>Um so they are insured by the FDIC?<p>Am I doing business with Square, Square Financial Services, Inc., or Sutton Bank?<p>Do I have any recurse when it comes to typical banking expectations &#x2F; rules here when it comes to either of the three companies I may or may not be using?
评论 #27895276 未加载
评论 #27894456 未加载
评论 #27895261 未加载
评论 #27894929 未加载
评论 #27894633 未加载
评论 #27894509 未加载
eggbrain将近 4 年前
While Square makes (more) sense to get into the banking game, I&#x27;ve noticed a lot of companies only tangentially related to finance doing similar things, and I wonder what it&#x27;s indicative of:<p>- T-Mobile offers an exclusive checking account for their customers<p>- Credit Karma promoting their own debit card<p>- Robin hood doing &quot;Cash Management&quot;<p>- Coinbase offering a debit card with crypto rewards<p>Has something changed with the ecosystem in the past 5 years? I&#x27;m half expecting NYTimes to release a banking&#x2F;checking account these days where you get rewarded with newspapers.
评论 #27895226 未加载
评论 #27895180 未加载
评论 #27895252 未加载
评论 #27895198 未加载
评论 #27896422 未加载
评论 #27895153 未加载
评论 #27897285 未加载
turbinerneiter将近 4 年前
I guess at some point, starting a business will be equivalent to downloading the square business app.
评论 #27898541 未加载
bdcravens将近 4 年前
Square has confirmed they are having issues: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.issquareup.com&#x2F;incidents&#x2F;9hzcgjpvj9dv" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.issquareup.com&#x2F;incidents&#x2F;9hzcgjpvj9dv</a>
评论 #27894853 未加载
kylec将近 4 年前
This seems like a promising alternative to Simple, which shut down a few months ago
评论 #27894080 未加载
评论 #27896050 未加载
评论 #27894692 未加载
评论 #27893807 未加载
schleiss将近 4 年前
I&#x27;m curious about the small business loans. I&#x27;m from Europe and the animations suggests for a $9000 loan a total repayment of $10305. Let&#x27;s assume you make $5000 in revenue per month and they use 10% as a repayment cut per transaction. That would yield a 20 month long repayment schedule. The &quot;interest&quot; would be roughly 7% annually. In today&#x27;s world, isn&#x27;t that greedy? In today&#x27;s world, Warren Buffet can issue a 0% coupon bond[1]. I&#x27;m just perplexed. Especially since it&#x27;s Square and not Goldman Sachs or JP Morgan.<p>According to the St Louis Fed, the average interest rate for Small Businesses was about 3.5 - 5% [2]. For me this sounds like an incredibly bad deal.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cbonds.com&#x2F;bonds&#x2F;698053&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cbonds.com&#x2F;bonds&#x2F;698053&#x2F;</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;fred.stlouisfed.org&#x2F;series&#x2F;EEBXSSNQ" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;fred.stlouisfed.org&#x2F;series&#x2F;EEBXSSNQ</a>
评论 #27898479 未加载
评论 #27918562 未加载
评论 #27898474 未加载
JCVI-syn10将近 4 年前
&gt; 0.5% APY on savings accounts<p>How insulting, and yet still better than the competition
评论 #27895863 未加载
评论 #27895461 未加载
评论 #27896886 未加载
alberth将近 4 年前
Did Square get a bank license or is an existing bank being used behind the scene?<p>If Square did get a bank license - this would be interesting since now they have all kinds of regulatory requirements to meet.
评论 #27896869 未加载
71a54xd将近 4 年前
Nope. I&#x27;m keeping Schwab for my banking needs. The last thing I need is a &quot;bank&quot; with more data about me than they really need and a lack of impeccable phone support.<p>Unfortunately, it&#x27;s probably going to take some time for people to realize the benefits of a &quot;slow and inefficient&quot; means of banking with lots of people in between. It sucks sometimes, but boy am I okay with it when they spot fraud or it takes someone days to empty my bank accounts instead of minutes.
JumpCrisscross将近 4 年前
These app-only banks seem to prey on the Robinhood customer set: users who respond positively to a nice UI and are willing to pay for it through friction, feature restriction and non-existent customer service.<p>Retail finance&#x27;s CLI to the saccharine of these apps is Fidelity. Free CMA with no ATM fees (third-party ATM fees reimbursed), no minimums, free wires in and out, securities able to be held in the account and good customer service on the phone and via chat.
评论 #27894682 未加载
gnicholas将近 4 年前
In case anyone was thinking this .5% APY savings account would be great for their company, this launch is just for sole proprietors.<p>&gt; <i>Your business entity type is a sole proprietorship, meaning you pay taxes for your business as an individual as opposed to another entity type (often the case for self-employed individuals or independent contractors)</i><p>They are apparently looking to add other entity types in the future.
Spoom将近 4 年前
Given the issues that Chime customers have had[1], and the fact that this seems to be organized in roughly the same way (actual banking services are provided by a contracted bank at a distance), I&#x27;d be a little skeptical.<p>1. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.propublica.org&#x2F;article&#x2F;chime" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.propublica.org&#x2F;article&#x2F;chime</a>
评论 #27897856 未加载
ilyas121将近 4 年前
The biggest question I would have is: How good the customer support is?<p>I have the worst luck, and all my new age accounts like Robinhood and Coinbase have little to no customer support compared to the incumbents.<p>I got lucky and the Robinhood situation resolved itself but I&#x27;ve been trying for over a year to contact Coinbase and circle the drain. Hopefully Square has better support.
评论 #27898545 未加载
overlordalex将近 4 年前
Warning: The site has some funky scrolling, but if you keep going there is more information that eventually shows up.<p>$scrolljackingRant
bdcravens将近 4 年前
Downside to anything associated with @jack is that every tweet is flooded with spammy and low-grade crypto comments. (was checking to see if there was info re the 500 errors)
bdcravens将近 4 年前
Looking for a new business bank for the small reselling business I run with my wife, so I thought I&#x27;d sign up.<p>All attempts are erroring out; signup endpoint is returning a 500.
评论 #27894961 未加载
garbagetime将近 4 年前
Site looks very nice but is somewhat unpleasant to use on desktop. Would have preferred a more basic experience.
vmception将近 4 年前
Does it allow business sign up? Like for accounting and limited liability?
评论 #27895475 未加载
imstil3earning将近 4 年前
Jeez this was hard to read with the annoying scrolling
xchaotic将近 4 年前
Just like a bank, without the security. Have a look like modern banks are done say in the UK - Monzo etc.
评论 #27896028 未加载
评论 #27897081 未加载
bawana将近 4 年前
just try getting customer service from cashapp...near impossible.
devops000将近 4 年前
&quot;Square, Inc. is a financial services company, not a bank. &quot;
评论 #27895454 未加载
评论 #27894458 未加载
评论 #27896735 未加载
bahmboo将近 4 年前
PayPal
isuckatcoding将近 4 年前
RIP Chime.
sergiotapia将近 4 年前
The brutalist website design for this new product is suffocating. Tried it on many browser widths on my desktop.
评论 #27894359 未加载
评论 #27894397 未加载
jbverschoor将近 4 年前
Yeah, another app-only bank. Or at least that what it seems. The desktop site in unreadable. Giant fonts.<p>So I&#x27;ll assume they&#x27;re like the rest - shitty &#x2F; no customer support outsourced to god who knows, and they&#x27;ll change &quot;shifts&quot; every 10 minutes.<p>No thank you, I&#x27;ll stay with the good old, dinosaur banks.
评论 #27894316 未加载
评论 #27893933 未加载
评论 #27893922 未加载
评论 #27894137 未加载