TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

9K downloads and Zero Sales, Why?

4 点作者 tealpod将近 4 年前
My product &#x27;Tealpod Image Compressor&#x27; is downloaded more than 9000 times but zero sales. Can someone help me understand why?<p>https:&#x2F;&#x2F;tealpod.com&#x2F;compressor&#x2F;index.html<p>Thanks in advance.

4 条评论

eesmith将近 4 年前
I&#x27;m quite outside your user base, and can&#x27;t provide suggestions along those lines. I&#x27;m also not in marketing and sales, so it&#x27;s a bit of blind-leading-the-blind here.<p>The &quot;pay what you want&quot; model is very tough. Most people &quot;want&quot; to pay nothing.<p>You have (putative) email addresses for some of your downloaders. You could ask them. Perhaps as part of a short survey?<p>It&#x27;s currently easier to do the &quot;free download&quot; than use the pay option. You could remove the &quot;free download&quot; link and have only &quot;Pay what you want $&quot;, defaulting to $15 as it is now, with an option to pay $0.<p>You could switch to nagware.<p>I&#x27;m hoping that my giving feedback here might encourage others to chime in, even if only to explain that I&#x27;m wrong. ;)
评论 #27973821 未加载
brudgers将近 4 年前
One problem with shareware is:<p><pre><code> trivial cost * many &gt; non-trivial cost </code></pre> Sure your program asks only a bit of money. But people use lots of free software which asks for a bit of money.<p>Some of it is not useful enough to warrant payment. But it has the same model.<p>How does someone execute a consistent approach? How do they treat everyone equally?<p>The simplest thing is not paying. Then there is no fretting over &quot;should I pay?&quot; No wondering &quot;since I paid for A, should I pay for B?&quot;<p>If you want money, require payment for download. Simple and tells you whether you are actually building something people will pay for. Requiring payment is a reliable form of feedback. Good luck.
评论 #27973879 未加载
HelloNurse将近 4 年前
It&#x27;s the combination of a simple tool type (many free and proven alternatives), a relatively professional usage pattern (many potential users already set up with something good enough) and, I&#x27;m afraid, lack of compelling novel features that are worth testing and&#x2F;or paying for and&#x2F;or taking the trouble to use something other than a general purpose image editor for. Some specific features are perplexing: where is lossless PNG recompression, with size benchmarks? How do you convert PSD and raw formats to simple images?
评论 #27973847 未加载
tiernano将近 4 年前
from looking at the page, it looks interesting, and it might be something i would find handy, for blog posts or my photography site. my question: are you asking for a payment in the app? Looks like its a &quot;pay what you want&quot; offering, but is &quot;free&quot; an option? when the app opens and you use it for months, does it pop up and ask for a payment?
评论 #27973764 未加载