TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

One Lost Methyl Group = Huge Amounts of Food Production

46 点作者 cdwhite将近 4 年前

4 条评论

aaron695将近 4 年前
This paper seems a really big deal. I can&#x27;t think of a peer reviewed post like this before.<p>Think anything that grows, food, hemp, oils, wood, carbon sequestration, cotton, opium, hedges, grass cattle eat, flowers, erosion control, fish tanks plants, underwater forests that should be able to penetrate current ocean deserts.<p>This should win Elon Musks $100 million.<p>The press release mentions growing tree in wind swept areas since the roots are deeper they withstand higher winds.<p>Just like we jumped on covid, we should jump on this, unless there&#x27;s a catch, like it&#x27;s to expensive to implement in large crops? Could they be faking this? Are they generalising past starch plants to much? (Still a noble prize)
SideburnsOfDoom将近 4 年前
previously on HN: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=27925250" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=27925250</a><p>RNA demethylation increases rice and potato yields 50% (nature.com) 6 days ago
FooBarBizBazz将近 4 年前
I imagine the nutrient density is now even lower?
评论 #28014391 未加载
xyzzy21将近 4 年前
Nothing is ever &quot;free&quot;. We know from GMO foods that making bigger versions comes with a tradeoff of worse nutritional content. This will be similar.
评论 #28001520 未加载
评论 #28015743 未加载