TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

A bad grade that changed the U.S. constitution (2017)

160 点作者 igonvalue将近 4 年前

6 条评论

ohazi将近 4 年前
Catch-22:<p>After he got the amendment ratified, there&#x27;s a strong argument that the paper probably should have been given a higher grade. But had he been given that higher grade in the first place, he probably wouldn&#x27;t have gone through the effort to ratify the amendment.<p>You could argue that the paper <i>did</i> deserve the initial C grade, because that&#x27;s what it took to get him angry enough to go and get the amendment ratified.
评论 #28068515 未加载
评论 #28069696 未加载
评论 #28068584 未加载
评论 #28069573 未加载
评论 #28069913 未加载
评论 #28068517 未加载
jawns将近 4 年前
There have been only two amendments to the U.S. Constitution over the past 50+ years (one of which is the subject of this story).<p>Why? Partly because the Supreme Court has been very willing to discover hidden rights within the existing amendments, decreasing the need for states to go through the very arduous process of getting a new amendment over the finish line.<p>That might seem like a fine way to handle things ... if the court is discovering constitutional rights that are in line with your views.<p>But this workaround puts a LOT of power into the hands of the nine justices who control the judicial branch. Amending the constitution was purposefully designed to be harder to do than passing normal legislation, which requires a majority of Congress plus the president&#x27;s signature. But in many pivotal cases over the past five decades, just five justices decided the outcome.
评论 #28068475 未加载
评论 #28068539 未加载
评论 #28068565 未加载
评论 #28068901 未加载
评论 #28069463 未加载
评论 #28068378 未加载
评论 #28069594 未加载
评论 #28068411 未加载
评论 #28069067 未加载
评论 #28068630 未加载
评论 #28068714 未加载
评论 #28069635 未加载
TrispusAttucks将近 4 年前
The Constitution of the United States<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.archives.gov&#x2F;founding-docs&#x2F;constitution-transcript" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.archives.gov&#x2F;founding-docs&#x2F;constitution-transcri...</a>
teorema将近 4 年前
What&#x27;s really depressing to me is the struggles of the student and lecturer involved, intimated at but never really a focus in their own right:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.statesman.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;20170314&#x2F;herman-35-years-later-a-for-austinite-who-got-constitution-amended" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.statesman.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;20170314&#x2F;herman-35-years-late...</a>
dcolkitt将近 4 年前
Wait, what. I’m more shocked at the part at the end about Mississippi not ratifying the abolition of slavery until 2013.
victor106将近 4 年前
&gt; In 1995, he realized Mississippi had never ratified the 13th Amendment, which abolished slavery. So he pushed that state&#x27;s Legislature to do it — and it worked.<p>Just think about that for a second: Someone had to push the state legislature to abolish slavery in 1995. Just sickening
评论 #28068940 未加载
评论 #28068967 未加载
评论 #28069078 未加载