TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Why we don't waterbomb at night?

21 点作者 cpard将近 4 年前

5 条评论

thaumasiotes将近 4 年前
Summary: flying low to the ground at night is dangerous, because it's hard to see.
评论 #28095555 未加载
评论 #28095599 未加载
joe_the_user将近 4 年前
California has recently acquired helicopters capable of doing night fire missions.[1] But jets seem to be too dangerous. From article: &quot;Larry Groff of Windsor and another pilot, Lars Stratte of Redding, were killed when their CAL FIRE air tankers collided over a fire near Hopland in 2001.&quot;<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.firehouse.com&#x2F;operations-training&#x2F;wildland&#x2F;news&#x2F;21126605&#x2F;ca-spends-nearly-300m-on-nightflying-wildfire-helicopters" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.firehouse.com&#x2F;operations-training&#x2F;wildland&#x2F;news&#x2F;...</a>
simonblack将近 4 年前
As an ex-pilot: Too frigging dangerous!<p>OTOH, I&#x27;d be very happy for YOU to have a go at it.
throwaway743将近 4 年前
As an alternative, would cloud seeding be feasible for this?
评论 #28096002 未加载
coding123将近 4 年前
I think the future of fires needs to be the following: send the 5000 men when it&#x27;s only 1000 acres, not 400k acres. So detect fast and respond faster. Or heck 2 acres.
评论 #28095510 未加载
评论 #28095579 未加载
评论 #28095633 未加载
评论 #28096126 未加载
评论 #28095620 未加载