TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Why I Wrote PGP (1999)

422 点作者 pdkl95将近 4 年前

15 条评论

uncomputation将近 4 年前
There’s something… different about how people (techie people are most of my sample) would write before the 00’s. I’m not sure if it has to do with the medium, or the constraints of the time, but reading it always fills me with something I can best describe as peace/nostalgia. The belief that technology honestly can change the world for the better and that the most influential people driving it have good motives instead of profit motives. And they were real visionaries most of the time. By contrast, anything seemingly after the dot com boom (I can’t draw a clear line, this is just throwing a dart) seems, I don’t know how to describe it. Too self-aware, too clever? It’s similar to the contrast between HN and other forums/social media out there. I’m not sure, but whenever an older article or something shows up, I usually enjoy it. Perhaps it’s that only the best have survived till now.
评论 #28105924 未加载
评论 #28105489 未加载
评论 #28106142 未加载
评论 #28104574 未加载
评论 #28104839 未加载
评论 #28107209 未加载
评论 #28105108 未加载
评论 #28106943 未加载
评论 #28107739 未加载
评论 #28108108 未加载
评论 #28108328 未加载
评论 #28105053 未加载
评论 #28106683 未加载
评论 #28107398 未加载
评论 #28107375 未加载
评论 #28104292 未加载
评论 #28104351 未加载
评论 #28105245 未加载
arminiusreturns将近 4 年前
From an old comment of mine on the topic:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;sKOk4Y4inVY?t=518" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;sKOk4Y4inVY?t=518</a> [1]<p>1. &quot;In 1995, there was a debate at Harvard Law School – four of us discussing the future of public key encryption and its control. I was on the side, I suppose, of freedom. It’s where I try to be. With me at that debate was a man called Daniel Weitzner who now works in the White House making Internet policy for the Obama administration.<p>On the other side was the then Deputy Attorney General of the United States and a lawyer in private practice named Stewart Baker who had been chief council to the National Security Agency, our listeners, and who was then in private life helping businesses to deal with the listeners. He then became, later on, the deputy for policy planning in the Department of Homeland Security in the United States and has much to do with what happened in our network after 2001.<p>At any rate, the four of us spent two pleasant hours debating the right to encrypt and at the end there was a little dinner party at the Harvard faculty club, and at the end, after all the food had been taken away and just the port and the walnuts were left on the table, Stuart said, “All right, among us now that we are all in private, just us girls, I’ll let our hair down.”<p>He didn’t have much hair even then, but he let it down.<p>“We are not going to prosecute your client, Mr. Zimmermann,&quot; he said. “Public key encryption will become available. We fought a long, losing battle against it, but it was just a delaying tactic.” And then he looked around the room and he said, ”But nobody cares about anonymity, do they?&quot;<p>And a cold chill went up my spine and I thought, all right, Stuart, and now I know you’re going to spend the next twenty years trying to eliminate anonymity in human society and I am going to try to stop you and we’ll see how it goes.<p>And it’s going badly. We didn’t build the net with anonymity built in. That was a mistake. Now we are paying for it.&quot; -Eben Moglen
评论 #28150784 未加载
评论 #28105717 未加载
breput将近 4 年前
PGP felt so subversive back in the day.<p>Key signing parties[1] and porting the &quot;international&quot; version[2] to run on the Amiga. And the very real threat that the Clipper Chip[3] would lead to the outlawing of all other encryption methods.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Key_signing_party" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Key_signing_party</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de&#x2F;~conrad&#x2F;krypto&#x2F;pgp263.features.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de&#x2F;~conrad&#x2F;krypto&#x2F;pgp263.features...</a><p>[3] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Clipper_chip" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Clipper_chip</a>
评论 #28104080 未加载
评论 #28104968 未加载
评论 #28104044 未加载
breput将近 4 年前
Matthew Green does a pretty good job picking apart PGP&#x27;s issues, although he completely fails at suggesting alternatives and also completely ignores non-email use cases.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.cryptographyengineering.com&#x2F;2014&#x2F;08&#x2F;13&#x2F;whats-matter-with-pgp&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.cryptographyengineering.com&#x2F;2014&#x2F;08&#x2F;13&#x2F;whats-ma...</a>
评论 #28104229 未加载
评论 #28104967 未加载
评论 #28104166 未加载
评论 #28110832 未加载
dang将近 4 年前
Some past threads:<p><i>Why I Wrote PGP (1999)</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=10581971" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=10581971</a> - Nov 2015 (47 comments)<p><i>Why I Wrote PGP (1999)</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=6823668" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=6823668</a> - Nov 2013 (109 comments)
jonathankoren将近 4 年前
My undergrad university library has (had?) a bound copy of PGP source code on the stacks for checkout.<p>If I remember correctly, digital copies of the binaries and source code were prohibited for export as a munition, but publishing the source code in a book, made it a book, and thus eligible for export.
j0e1将近 4 年前
&gt; But while technology infrastructures can persist for generations, laws and policies can change overnight. Once a communications infrastructure optimized for surveillance becomes entrenched, a shift in political conditions may lead to abuse of this new-found power. Political conditions may shift with the election of a new government, or perhaps more abruptly from the bombing of a federal building.<p>Prescient.
评论 #28104743 未加载
评论 #28104281 未加载
评论 #28104293 未加载
评论 #28104133 未加载
lottin将近 4 年前
According to the legend, they weren&#x27;t allowed to publish PGP on the internet because US laws forbade exporting of cryptographic tools, so they made a book with the entire source code and shipped that overseas.
评论 #28105136 未加载
评论 #28105137 未加载
评论 #28107401 未加载
评论 #28106241 未加载
cowmix将近 4 年前
I have sooooo many lost emails due to lost pgp configurations. Encrypted blobs in my mail spools.
评论 #28105044 未加载
评论 #28106686 未加载
评论 #28105702 未加载
TeeMassive将近 4 年前
Is there a good websites listing the ways being spied on can affect you personally?<p>Would be great every time a &quot;I don&#x27;t care if the NSA watch my dick picks, bro&quot; naive person bring this to my face again.
评论 #28106506 未加载
评论 #28105195 未加载
评论 #28104868 未加载
评论 #28117984 未加载
评论 #28105589 未加载
rsyring将近 4 年前
Created 1991, updated 1999
评论 #28104034 未加载
bariswheel将近 4 年前
&#x27;The only way to hold the line on privacy in the information age is strong cryptography.&#x27;
评论 #28106680 未加载
评论 #28105714 未加载
jtsuken将近 4 年前
My favourite conspiracy theory is that the whole Trevor Martin&#x2F;George Zimmerman affair (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Killing_of_Trayvon_Martin" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Killing_of_Trayvon_Martin</a>) was pushed so hard by US media mainly to suppress any reference to George Zimmerman and PGP after the publication of Snowden&#x27;s papers.
评论 #28106183 未加载
评论 #28106574 未加载
评论 #28122689 未加载
upofadown将近 4 年前
I think that sometimes we forget that PGP is primarily a political statement. It makes the world a better place simply by existing.
DrStartup将近 4 年前
PGP key server on a eth dapp?