If I may be so bold, scrolling around the Netherlands and what is covered of Germany, it seems pretty useless.<p>- The resolution is so low, it's really hard to tell if there might be missing roads/routes or if this concerns water/rail.<p>- There are so many water/rail mistakes, there is red <i>everywhere</i> also in areas where I know every road in existence is on there. You have to evaluate each tile manually for all of the covered landmass.<p>- Just taking out air/rail/water might not solve the problem. Looking in residential areas with no water or rail nearby, there are still yellow tiles popping up at random with no indication as to why. Having the offending trace(s) would be really helpful here, but those are of course not shareable for privacy reasons. Perhaps short cutouts could be shared that are between 25 and 75% of the route (so not near the source <i>or</i> destination)? That would make it very clear if the person is on a bus (that obviously won't follow the shortest path in most cases) because the trace would go past the bus stops and often linger there, or if it was a cyclist for example.<p>As a frequent OSM contributor I love such initiatives and I'm very happy to see TomTom getting more involved. TomTom's map quality is so far behind OSM (globally), I was wondering who'd even still considering buying from them so it makes a lot of sense to combine forces instead. User data is the main advantage Google has over OSM, for both live traffic and purposes like these, so I'm very happy to see innovation here! I'll definitely be checking out updates to the site.