TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

We don't 'do' learning. It does us

59 点作者 DanielBMarkham超过 3 年前

6 条评论

warent超过 3 年前
It sounds like the author is discovering intuition as articulated in a very ancient form. Artists and geniuses have long had experiences of knowledge and information flowing through them and expressing itself through them as some external thing. Actually, everyone has this, but some seemingly to a greater degree than others.<p>Take for example August Kekule who supposedly discovered the shape of the benzene ring via dream of an ouroboros. Or, Seymour Cray who came to solutions via &quot;communicating with elves&quot; under his home.<p>If I recall correctly, I remember reading that in ancient Greece it was believed wisdom and knowledge was some external thing (maybe only one philosopher thought this?), like a spirit that would visit an individual. Things were not actively learned, but they were granted and bestowed by an unknown force.<p>The article though is very difficult to parse. Not to be rude but the signature at the end makes me think the author might just really enjoy the sound of their own writing a bit too much and wants to come across as profound. Communicating things in simpler, more relatable terms is much more meaningful and valuable. Then again it&#x27;s also possible the author is just so eccentric and brilliant that their way of thinking is difficult to follow.
评论 #28262902 未加载
评论 #28266296 未加载
skmurphy超过 3 年前
Key insight: &quot;We talk about organizations being good or bad at learning, but that&#x27;s not really the case. All organizations learn. One of the first things a team learns are the shared stories the organization has for being as screwed up as it is&quot;<p>I think most successful new hires learn how to work within the &quot;screwed up&quot; environment, not how to change it--much less improve it. Change agents are rare.
undershirt超过 3 年前
I don’t understand all of this essay, but something about his awareness of cybernetics makes me want to keep reading it until it makes sense.<p>&gt; We think of computers interacting with people as something created by programmers… That&#x27;s not true, though… folks creating UX receive vastly more stimulus from machines than they ever would create for others.<p>&gt; Programming languages, IDEs, and dev environments affect the people swimming in them far more than those people change the world for others
coyotespike超过 3 年前
I find this a useful framing, as it encourages me to direct my attention to the broader context.<p>An organization is always learning something, what and how are we learning, and does that fit for where we are now?
carlivar超过 3 年前
This is an interesting story, but does it have any point? I struggled to find it. Is it that learning can&#x27;t be isolated so organizations shouldn&#x27;t bother with formal training? Yet that doesn&#x27;t seem right.<p>Strange. I enjoyed the article and nodded along with it but it seemed like an observation I have with a colleague over beers.
hcta超过 3 年前
I can tell this guy has been reading too much Heidegger because this post and the one it references are completely incomprehensible to me.
评论 #28261259 未加载
评论 #28262002 未加载