TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Launch HN: Buoyant (YC S21) – Blimp drones for air freight

302 点作者 joefigura超过 3 年前
Hi, we’re Ben and Joe from Buoyant (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.buoyant.aero&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.buoyant.aero&#x2F;</a>). We build small unmanned cargo airships and use them to move air freight at half the cost per mile of a small plane.<p>An airship (or blimp) is an aircraft that gets most of its lift from a lifting gas like helium. It’s the most efficient way to fly, which means it’s cheaper than any other aircraft for many missions. We’re starting by building an aircraft for middle-mile air freight in remote and rural areas—warehouse-to-warehouse or post office to post office. This is a $6B market in the US alone, and freight volumes are only increasing. By building autonomous blimps, we can lower shipping costs, increase quality and speed of service, and cut out millions of tons of CO2 emissions.<p>So far, we’ve built and flown four airships. The latest is 20 feet long and can fly up to 35 miles per hour. Here’s a video: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=VEYOfVcwRhk" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=VEYOfVcwRhk</a>.<p>We’re starting in areas where freight is already moved on small planes and helicopters. In these remote areas, availability of goods is lower, shipping takes longer, and it’s more expensive. For example, food in rural parts of Alaska is twice as expensive as in Anchorage. Small air freight is particularly expensive because of the cost of fuel, maintenance, pilots, and airport infrastructure. To make major cost reductions we need a new type of aircraft.<p>Ben is a mechanical engineer from Alaska and grew up in the outdoors, so is familiar with the challenges of remote supply operations. He has built aircraft tracking technology for the DoD, flat panel phased array antennas, GPS data loggers for motorsports, and helped start a company that made shirts with upside down pockets. I’m an aerospace engineer who’s built and flown spacecraft at two internet satellite startups, spending a lot of time on complicated flying machines. We met at MIT and have been friends for almost a decade since.<p>We spent years building satellites and antennas to provide internet connectivity to rural areas, and while doing so learned about the transportation challenges in remote places. Many drone delivery projects have focused on delivering small packages in suburbs, and are too short range or low payload to serve rural areas. We realized small airships were a technical approach that could work to move cargo in these areas, and decided to tackle the challenge.<p>An airship is the most efficient way to fly because it gets most of its lift from buoyancy, rather than spending energy on rotor lift or aerodynamic lift over a wing. This lets us fly further and carry more payload than other small aircraft. Other attempts at unmanned cargo aircraft have used quadcopters or quad-plane hybrid drones. These are useful for some missions but lack the flight efficiency to carry large payloads long distances. Airships have other benefits too: they are safer and quieter than quadcopters or multirotor-plane hybrids. If the motors fail, an airship floats to the ground, while a quadcopter comes crashing down. And it’s an easy way to build an aircraft that can takeoff and land vertically, like a helicopter.<p>Our airship is a fabric envelope filled with helium, with an attached payload bay, motors, and power system. It gets 2&#x2F;3 of its lift from buoyancy, and the rest from aerodynamic lift. This combination is called a hybrid airship, and allows us to drop off a payload without needing to take on ballast. The aircraft flies autonomously and can take off and land in inclement weather, using centimeter accuracy GPS for approaches. The full scale version will load 650 lbs of cargo at one end, fly to the destination while we pilot it remotely, deposit the cargo, and return. Our first operational vehicle will be battery electric, with a range of 200-300 miles and a cruise speed of 60 mph. Future vehicles will have hydrogen powertrains for longer-range missions.<p>We started off with a last-mile delivery concept (“Amazon box to the house”). But in conversations with logistics providers, we found a recurring problem transporting 300-600 lb shipments between warehouses or between airports. Using drones to deliver to houses is operationally complex, and the path to doing so at scale is still murky. But with a 650 lb payload, our drone can fit neatly into existing supply chains in the middle mile. This makes our operations much simpler and should allow us to get to market relatively quickly with a few aircraft on a few routes. We’ve closed $5M in LOIs, including one from a large regional air carrier in Alaska, and have two pilot programs planned.<p>We loved reading the thread a couple weeks ago about hydrogen vs. helium for blimps, and are excited to see what people think about our airships! Where do you see the biggest use case for vehicles like ours? Let us know any other thoughts or ideas, and we’ll be active in the comments today.

68 条评论

blantonl超过 3 年前
This is a neat concept - especially considering they are autonomous. However, I wonder about these risk scenarios:<p>1) Weather. Moving at 35 mph it seems that a lot of long term planning is in order for something that could be severely impacted by weather. This sounds like a logistical nightmare during a week of active weather across the country.<p>2) Helium availability - there have been reports that the costs of helium have gone up considerably since there are only a very few producers of the gas and this seems like it would be a huge consumer of such gas.<p>3) Vandalism. Never underestimate the power of stupid people. It&#x27;s well known in the railroad industry that trains and their cargo often take bullets from traveling cross country. In fact, the 737 fuselages that travel across country on trains for Boeing often have bullet holes in them that must be repaired. Add in a huge cargo blimp that is unmanned and the urge for vandalism will be significant for some nefarious actors.
评论 #28281078 未加载
lachstar-x超过 3 年前
Hello gents! I have a burning question for you - what do you think about the idea of building a small airship that can be lived and traveled in? Sort of like a tiny house or vanlife, but in the air.<p>It&#x27;s something I&#x27;ve always thought about since reading about it in science fiction books. What would the cost of something like that be?
评论 #28315797 未加载
评论 #28284288 未加载
traceroute66超过 3 年前
Don&#x27;t take this the wrong way but...<p>I think its hard to avoid the elephant in the room that blimp cargo has been a dream ever since the invention of the blimp, and if we put your technology claims to one side (because they are more an assistant, not an enabler) I&#x27;m not too sure what makes you any different ?<p>Look at what is perhaps your most recent competitor ... Flying Whales.<p>Going since 2012, burning through cash like there&#x27;s no tomorrow ($30m Quebec, €225m France etc. etc.) , and so far maybe promising some sort of prototype by 2024 (already slipped from 2021).<p>What <i>really</i> makes you so different from prior dreamers and in particular your present competitors ?
评论 #28280606 未加载
评论 #28280515 未加载
评论 #28293089 未加载
评论 #28280622 未加载
评论 #28280442 未加载
Mountain_Skies超过 3 年前
Suggestion for a potential marketing tool when you get to that point: have someone create your blimp in Microsoft Flight Simulator. While blimps already exist in the simulator, your design sounds unique and this would be a way to raise awareness of your company, even if sim players aren&#x27;t your target customers.
评论 #28293762 未加载
elamje超过 3 年前
Very cool concept.<p>I’m sure your guys have done a ton of prior art, but I want to encourage you to make sure Amazon hasn’t patented this in any capacity yet.<p>A close friend that worked at Prime Air shared how years ago their division had a full time legal staff dedicated to patenting all engineers ideas. He had gotten several patents even being entry level FWIW. They had several concepts very similar to this and it wouldn’t surprise me if they were able to get that IP locked down. Like I said, I expect you all have checked and rechecked but thought it’s worth mentioning.
评论 #28280669 未加载
评论 #28282589 未加载
lexicality超过 3 年前
What&#x27;s your plan for dealing with the fact that Helium is a non-renewable resource that we are rapidly running out of?<p>Have you done experiments into hydrogen safety?
评论 #28279373 未加载
fernly超过 3 年前
Video would be much more impressive if it showed loading the cargo package -- can it pick up autonomously or does it need to be loaded by a ground crew? -- and also dropping it off within a designated space marked by cones.<p>Will the full-size model be able to lift a standard 40-foot shipping container? That would be very cool indeed, to have the blimp pick up from a truck or from a container ship.
评论 #28286058 未加载
评论 #28288320 未加载
peregrine超过 3 年前
This is really cool and this is the kind of startup I&#x27;d be applying to in a heartbeat! Very excited to see this happening, great work! I feel like there is vastly more potential for LTA flight that isn&#x27;t being re-explored with autonomous drones and solar being viable now.<p>What altitudes do you intend on operating in the &quot;v1&quot;?
评论 #28280270 未加载
评论 #28285166 未加载
fishtoaster超过 3 年前
That&#x27;s very cool!<p>How does it handle weather? You mention it can take off and land in inclement weather, but how does it compare with existing competitors? Intuitively (as someone with zero knowledge or experience in any of this), it seems like planes and helicopters could handle higher winds than a blimp - is that the case?
评论 #28279045 未加载
deepnotderp超过 3 年前
Isn’t the von Karman efficiency of small airships very low? I struggle to see how you can claim “ An airship is the most efficient way to fly because it gets most of its lift from buoyancy”.<p>Either way, seems like a cool project- I wish you luck!
评论 #28280397 未加载
评论 #28293150 未加载
Mizza超过 3 年前
Nifty! Simple, exciting and aesthetically pleasing idea. I&#x27;ve known people from Alaska who have to get their supplies flown in, so it&#x27;s cool you&#x27;re covering that use case from the start - although apparently that whole service economy is really driven by the smuggling of alcohol, as many towns there are &quot;dry&quot;. You may be stepping on some toes if you muscle into this territory.<p>How does piloting work? Is the goal to make these things completely autonomous, or will there be a remote pilot at all times?<p>What&#x27;s the business model? Can I buy one of your blimps, or are you going to become FedEx of the low skies?
评论 #28279995 未加载
burnished超过 3 年前
I think this is a really interesting project. When I read about the helium vs hydrogen post, same as you, I started scratching things out for curiosities sake (I was more curious about how high you could reasonably go). Very exciting stuff. I&#x27;ve got a bunch of questions, feel free to cherry pick if you decide to respond.<p>How delicate do you suspect this will be? Will a bored or malicious person be able to cause harm with a laser, an air rifle with pellet or BB, or gun? In the event of a puncture what is the failure mode like? Are you worried about birds? Are you concerned about banditry? I know the last might sound silly, but you&#x27;d only really need to go to our grand-parents and great-grand-parents to find some train robbers.<p>I could see Hollywood making use of this for filming in remote locations. Or other situations where you need to get something heavy and oddly shaped up or over a mountain. Relief work as well where the roads aren&#x27;t operable. Wouldn&#x27;t surprise me if this had applications in agriculture either, if anyone is still using planes might be nicer to have an autonomous blimp instead. Maybe stuff like introducing fish to alpine lakes, if you&#x27;ve got good control of vertical height you could probably design a safe exit system.<p>Most of that is supposing that getting the blimp somewhere to then be used is easy. How is transportation of those things when not in use?
评论 #28280168 未加载
quadcore超过 3 年前
Wooah the video is so hacker-cool. I would add a little mention on your videos to tell it&#x27;s not CGI (<i>real life&#x2F;world footage</i> or something), it might add to the impact and make it tiktok ready. Speaking of tiktok, might be an interesting platform for your videos.
dmix超过 3 年前
This seems much safer than most autonomous drones I&#x27;ve seen (or planes&#x2F;helicopters). I hope this works out.<p>Having a bunch of them in the air in a constant cycle synced with the warehouse could compensate for the lost speed and could result in more distributed last mile centers. So package delivery is closer to ordering time, rather than sitting in queued bunches.
评论 #28280196 未加载
ascales超过 3 年前
I think the concept is awesome, and I&#x27;m excited to see it, but it raises so many questions about how this is going to work. First question that comes to mind is how are you going to handle weather- and not just crazy storms, but heat and pressure too. Blimps&#x2F;semi-rigid airships face a less than ideal operating window, and while ballonets and ballast can help manage the buoyancy of the ship, inevitably you&#x27;ll have to vent helium. How are you going to approach the infrastructure the drones are going to need to stay topped up on helium and ballast, and how are you going to approach emergency situations where you end up outside of the operating window of the aircraft?
评论 #28281274 未加载
plafl超过 3 年前
Very nice. I have somewhere the book Airship Technology, which I bought when I was curious about the possibility of blimp drones (I was an aerospace engineer some time ago).<p>I&#x27;m glad you are considering smaller blimps, I think previous projects have been too ambitious. Since I have worked on drone navigation I&#x27;m curious about your approach in that regard and how you are going to attain autonomy and get it certified. If you manage to get it a completely autonomous and certified that alone will be an asset even if you pivot away from blimps! Are you going to use alternatives to GPS? GPS is very precise when it works but I doubt you can get certification based on that alone.
sirtimbly超过 3 年前
I can&#x27;t stop thinking about this. Logistic systems that utilize heli-stats and other drones for various flexible and inconvenient legs of the route seem incredibly powerful to replace trucks and small planes. Automation will change everything.
walrus01超过 3 年前
What are your thoughts on using gasoline or diesel and a free-piston linear generator to achieve much better watt-hour&#x2F;kg ratio (as compared to li-ion batteries), without all of the gas handling and complexity of a hydrogen fuel cell setup?
评论 #28285154 未加载
EMM_386超过 3 年前
&gt; and can take off and land in inclement weather<p>What kind of inclement weather are we talking about?<p>Aircraft have to deal with some <i>really</i> inclement weather. METARs like 12026G41. You mention you are testing in Alaska, which is infamous for this.<p>How much of a problem will this be?
评论 #28279145 未加载
Jabbles超过 3 年前
I don&#x27;t understand how this could lift 650lb:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wolframalpha.com&#x2F;input&#x2F;?i=20ft+*+3ft+*+3ft+*+2+*+density+of+air" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wolframalpha.com&#x2F;input&#x2F;?i=20ft+*+3ft+*+3ft+*+2+*...</a><p>= 28 lbs (13 kg)
评论 #28278916 未加载
clueless123超过 3 年前
How high can this ships go? How Fast?<p>All along the Andes in South America there is a dire need to efficiently move products from high altitude to the coast (where major cities are)<p>In Peru for example, there are hundreds of small farming towns sitting at 10&#x27;000+ feet of altitude but just 40 straight line miles from the ocean.. Today to get there, trucks have to use one of the few roads that ,zig-zag up to the high lands before heading into any of this towns. ( an 8 to 16 hour trip )<p>Being able to ship produce straight down to the big cities on the coast would be a game changer.<p>* I posted this on another thread, but I just found this is the OP
c_o_n_v_e_x超过 3 年前
Cool idea. Coincidentally, I used to a share a ride to work with a guy who spent a number of years at Hybrid Air Vehicles (the blimp with the rear-end shaped rear end). I myself worked in UAV start-up in a previous life. I always had to evaluate aerostats as a competing technology to what we had to offer.<p>Do you see any optionality in markets you can target besides delivery? Defense&#x2F;surveillance? Anti-poaching? We had quite a bit of interest in wildlife sanctuary and border surveillance. Monitoring for illegal fishing is a very hot topic for a certain large SE Asian archipelago.
twoWhlsGud超过 3 年前
You&#x27;re probably familiar with the AEREON 26 <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;AEREON_26" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;AEREON_26</a> But if you haven&#x27;t read John McPhee&#x27;s excellent book The Deltoid Pumpkin Seed, I&#x27;d highly recommend doing so.
HALtheWise超过 3 年前
One obvious tradeoff blimps is lower speeds than what people normally expect from &quot;air freight&quot;. You mention 60mph in your post, which seems comparable to trucks. Are your customers primarily interested in air freight for speed, or is it mostly avoiding the cost of a driver, or is it something else entirely?
评论 #28285263 未加载
评论 #28279759 未加载
malwrar超过 3 年前
This is a project I’ve had in the back of my mind for awhile! Cool to see you guys on the front page, if you start hiring I’ll definitely be reaching out. Curious about the following:<p>1.) What does the regulatory landscape look like for this kind of work? Was there significant prep, or did you guys find it easy to get moving right away? I’m curious specifically about any obstacles both with flying your airships and the remote piloting.<p>2.) How much of the airship is manufactured in-house? Are you building the whole airship from scratch? Designing the fabric envelope material too?<p>3.) You mention the airships land in inclement weather, how inclement might that be? Any cool test videos you could share? :P
评论 #28285286 未加载
bbojan超过 3 年前
Since you&#x27;re already planning on using hydrogen fuel cells for propulsion, does it play well with using hydrogen as the lift gas, too? Since the airship is unmanned, this seems like a good synergy.
评论 #28281070 未加载
magicfriday超过 3 年前
Amazing, we have been looking for company like that. How high you can fly ? Could you take our cargo to stratosphere ? Is high altitude considered?<p>Also what about solar ? Is there a possibility for flexible solar panels on envelope ? Of the shelf solar can bend to about 30 deg, I am unsure what is the max with current technology.<p>In anyways all the best in your endeavours I am rooting for you. There are many more applications where blimps like that and different would be great fit
toss1超过 3 年前
Wow, nice work! It looks quite controllable and maneuverable in what appear to be decent winds. Interesting using dual cylinders - what do you find works best about that design vs others you considered? Does this provide any redundancy (as in could you fly if one deflated)? What scale of thrust and elec power do you use (if you don&#x27;t mind my asking)? Are you considering a range of sizes or just the &quot;mid mile&quot; 650Lb capacity version?
6510超过 3 年前
&gt; We loved reading the thread a couple weeks ago about hydrogen vs. helium for blimps<p>Say it takes 1000 m3 hydrogen to lift 1 m3 concrete. Image a pyramid shaped cone 4000 meter long with a bottom 4 m3. Now imagine a balloon with a diameter of 8000 meters.<p>Clearly much to big to build [for now]. We pump the hydrogen out of it. How much extra lift does that generate before the balloon implodes? What other materials can we use? Would it be possible to make it smaller than a km?
评论 #28293241 未加载
rlonn超过 3 年前
Stupid question: how do you handle air resistance on a windy day? I always thought that&#x27;s what made blimps inherently uneconomical (though can also imagine maintenance costs are high). An airplane has very little drag compared to its lift capacity. I don&#x27;t really know, but expect a blimp to be terrible in comparison. Fine for stationary lifting, but expensive when you want to move things horizontally, against the wind.
评论 #28293161 未加载
klausjensen超过 3 年前
How does one follow your progress? Your website doesn&#x27;t list any social media, mailing list etc (which is fine and understandable - focus on building) - but I want to follow how you guys do. :)<p>I am very fascinated by this! I read the headline and thought it sounds super-gimmicky, but I spent the last two hours crawling down this rabbithole, and I really like your idea and approach. It makes total sense. I wish you guys all the best of luck!
atlasunshrugged超过 3 年前
You mention the full scale version will take 650lbs - are there plans to increase that in the future? I&#x27;m thinking about the transport of commodities from inland hubs in Africa&#x2F;MENA (e.g. copper in Zambia, coffee in West Africa) that is a pain to get to ports now. How does it perform in heavy rains? What sort of infrastructure investment is needed to set up facilities to receive the airship on either side?
mwcampbell超过 3 年前
Not to be confused with the other Buoyant [1], the company behind the linkerd service mesh.<p>Not that I&#x27;m really into service meshes, but I happened to be doing some reading about the Tokio async runtime for Rust yesterday, and a lot of the work on that has been funded by that Buoyant, which is why that company was on my mind.<p>[1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;buoyant.io&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;buoyant.io&#x2F;</a>
nico_h超过 3 年前
I love blimps and dirigibles, but I have always wondered about their practicality, particularly in inclement weather. like, when it rain, they get heavier,<p>For rural or sub-urban logistics I can see how it could work, if you have large enough landing zones, or if you have strong enough station keeping maybe a winching system from a few stories high (then the weight question pops up)<p>I&#x27;m curious about the economics question like what kind of 300 &#x2F; 600lb shipment is worth the trip, and how much of it are there in a blimp-appropriate weather areas that it justifies the development and deployment of a whole new class of transport? (and how do you plan of safeguarding it against pirates;)<p>Do you plan to store your airships are a particular location or will the just hang out in the air somewhere waiting for a payload?<p>Have you considered partnering with earth imaging services to sell them images during trips or serving as relay antenna for them to communicate with their micro-satellites<p>I also have lots of silly questions:<p>- if it&#x27;s sunny, would a black envelope provide better lift?<p>- A what watt &#x2F; square meter &#x2F; kilo &#x2F; solar prevalence are solar panels on top worth the extra complexity and weight?<p>- Would there be any advantage to using a pump+compressor to vary the quantity of helium in the envelope? What about heaters &#x2F; coolers ?
评论 #28286232 未加载
bambax超过 3 年前
&gt; <i>and helped start a company that made shirts with upside down pockets</i><p>Okay, I would like to know more about this... Who was it for?
evrydayhustling超过 3 年前
Can you share details about the CO2 emissions per kg-mile of cargo as compared to e.g. trucking or traditional air freight?
literallyaduck超过 3 年前
What about using aerial cranes to build a zip line depot network instead. You could then have anchor lines for your blimps.
ansible超过 3 年前
I&#x27;ve thought the hybrid airship approach has a lot of benefits, and fewer drawbacks than conventional airships.<p>What&#x27;s the full-scale design going to look like? Will you continue to use the standard blimp shaped envelope? Or will you transition to a fat flying wing type design?
评论 #28281167 未加载
anotheryou超过 3 年前
How dangerous is wind?<p>So many cool concepts failed to just hunker down during wind.<p>My favourite, the cyclocrane <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;CiU71GFs4Fs?t=178" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;CiU71GFs4Fs?t=178</a><p>The cyclocrane seems to have targeted a similar market replacing helicopters.
aurizon超过 3 年前
Can ammonia gas be used? NH3 is non flammable, is far cheaper(with less lift as well) leaks a lot less, but does have low temperature condensation issues = warmer flight times only. In addition, the wind speed in Alaska is often above 60 MPH
评论 #28285948 未加载
评论 #28285128 未加载
avernon超过 3 年前
Did you choose batteries for the first version to simplify the power train? Also, why use hydrogen instead of a cheaper, buoyant neutral fuel like propane? If you are worried about the carbon, you can always buy direct air capture credits.
sokoloff超过 3 年前
It seems like Alaska is quite prone to inclement weather, not just clouds but ice, including SLD icing.<p>How’s a blimp handle icing conditions? (I’m imagining “poorly”, but I don’t have a real idea and suspect you’ve got more info on it.)
评论 #28282392 未加载
Karrot_Kream超过 3 年前
Do you see opportunities in a &quot;missing middle&quot;, where maybe a direct airship route may be more efficient than criss-crossing a rail cargo network? I&#x27;ve been interested in this space for a long time!
评论 #28285292 未加载
hirundo超过 3 年前
It sounds like an outstanding search and rescue platform, in calm conditions.
评论 #28284018 未加载
评论 #28279399 未加载
senojretep356超过 3 年前
Damn you are going to kill it with current shipping prices being INSANE. I heard containers that used to ship for $4k now cost $20k. Delivery times have blown from 50 days to 250 days.
solresol超过 3 年前
It would be a risky flight for the drone, but that might get supplies to Pitcairn island, where it could be recharged and sent back. (Prevailing winds might be a problem though.)
totetsu超过 3 年前
Is this like the dynalifter? <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ohioairships.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ohioairships.com&#x2F;</a>
sauravmitra超过 3 年前
Makes a lot of sense. Save energy, travel further and carry more. Unfortunate that I won&#x27;t have a blimp arriving at my doorstep though (yet!) :P<p>Good luck!
dchristian超过 3 年前
How far along are you on getting FAA approval for beyond visual line of sight operation? Or will there be a pilot on the full scale version?
评论 #28279371 未加载
b20000超过 3 年前
where did you get the money to build all this? if you already have this sort of money, what do you need YC for?
评论 #28285305 未加载
评论 #28280955 未加载
bayesian_horse超过 3 年前
I hope it has a good collision avoidance system. There are lots of small planes and helicopters in Alaska.
thirdlamp超过 3 年前
Have you thought about information gathering applications? For example inspecting power lines.
ReedJessen超过 3 年前
Love the idea. How do I reach out for employment as an experienced data science leader?
miketery超过 3 年前
How does a hybrid blimp compare to a glider style drone as it relates to efficiency?
CodeGlitch超过 3 年前
This is really cool, also surprisingly agile! Are the gas bags at earth pressure?
jacknews超过 3 年前
Is hydrogen as lifting gas still verboten? Yet aok under high pressure as fuel?
legohead超过 3 年前
Cool project, I like the idea. How loud is this thing, as compared to a drone?
devenson超过 3 年前
Can you control boyancy by compressing and decompressing the helium slightly?
评论 #28285129 未加载
mensetmanusman超过 3 年前
I have connections at 3M, let me know if you need any fancy materials :)
agumonkey超过 3 年前
If long term safety is favorable, I&#x27;d to see more of theses.
thechao超过 3 年前
How do I convince you to make a thermal semirigid body airship?
ogsalmanxx超过 3 年前
As long as this is better for the environment I’m all for it.
fortran77超过 3 年前
In remote areas, might hydrogen be safe enough to use?
评论 #28284364 未加载
sbr464超过 3 年前
Had any interesting run-ins with lightning?
11thEarlOfMar超过 3 年前
Makes me think &#x27;barge vs. wagon&#x27;.
rasen58超过 3 年前
Isn&#x27;t 650 lbs not that much? It&#x27;s only a little more than 4 humans. So is this actually scalable to get to a bigger market?
heyflyguy超过 3 年前
What kind of payload are we talking?
bserge超过 3 年前
If you can make them stealthier, accept crypto and&#x2F;or cash and not ask a lot of questions, I believe you can double that market figure.