TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

What is server-side conversion tracking?

60 点作者 marketingtech超过 3 年前

9 条评论

extr超过 3 年前
I don't know how this shit works. But earlier this month I was showing my girlfriend a Halloween costume I googled on my phone. I visited the website for maybe 10 seconds, I did not log in or create an account. A few days later I got an email from PayPal offering me a $5 coupon for that website. WTFFFF. It made me want to go full-nuclear on the privacy front.
评论 #28307950 未加载
评论 #28308058 未加载
评论 #28313118 未加载
评论 #28309878 未加载
评论 #28314486 未加载
评论 #28310071 未加载
评论 #28310213 未加载
评论 #28308199 未加载
marketingtech超过 3 年前
For those who are referencing tracking pixels and say this isn&#x27;t anything new, it&#x27;s important to understand that this is the next evolution of that technology as a result of government regulations around privacy and browser&#x2F;OS ecosystem changes from Google, Apple, and Mozilla. This data transfer won&#x27;t occur at the browser layer for much longer - it won&#x27;t be as technically feasible without cookies and it may not be legal given consent&#x2F;opt-out requirements. Instead the data will pass directly from the advertiser&#x27;s server to the ad platform&#x27;s server. Of course this tech has existed for a long time - it&#x27;s a basic API call - but it hasn&#x27;t been widely adopted in the ad tech industry, while millions of websites are using tracking pixels.<p>It is not a 1:1 replacement for tracking pixels and lacks some of those creepy features (you&#x27;re unlikely to get tagged if you simply browse a website without giving up any personal info), but it offers new ones as well (the ability to send arbitrary data to an ad platform).
评论 #28310514 未加载
edoceo超过 3 年前
Oh, I remember this, from like 2000 (in CGI&#x2F;Perl). Did it this way for ages then there was this ground-breaking company for ads called &quot;DoubleClick&quot; (I think) that did it all with cookies and js. Wonder whatever happened to them.
评论 #28307924 未加载
scott00超过 3 年前
How in the world does this satisfy the advertisers? They send the personal identifying details of each customer to Google&#x2F;FB, and then Google&#x2F;FB tells them &quot;oh yeah, that guy totally saw an ad&quot;? The ad giants would never lie about such a thing... they will just fix all of the bugs that under report and just not have the time to get to all of those pesky over-reporting bugs.
评论 #28309671 未加载
评论 #28310160 未加载
dillondoyle超过 3 年前
I have this setup for our clients on FB.<p>The reported ROAS is all over the place on FB right now. It goes from previously 1 = 100% return on investment. Now it sometimes says 10X numbers like 70, which I assume is of the data they could measure 70% roi.<p>It seems to &#x27;automagically&#x27; combine the offline conversion data with standard FBQ but I have no idea the match rates for the server-server data I send in and also importantly if it de-dupes.<p>I&#x27;ve tried to experiment with voting data in the past, I want to try that more this election. Run get out the vote ads and optimize for actual early votes.
phibz超过 3 年前
This is nothing new. We were sharing impression data with client partners from the server side years ago.
pjmlp超过 3 年前
It is another example how Web apps are apparently more secure than native ones.
majormajor超过 3 年前
&gt; “The server-side option was built as part of our ongoing work to give advertisers more control over their users’ data,” said a Google spokesperson<p>Wait. Whose data is it, Google?
tsjq超过 3 年前
does blocking 3rd party cookies suffice to get rid of this ?
评论 #28310228 未加载