TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Music streaming payouts comparison

71 点作者 bartoszhernas超过 3 年前

21 条评论

pedrocr超过 3 年前
<i>&gt;Of all the money Spotify receives, 70 percent goes to the right holders.</i><p>So Spotify only takes a 30% cut, that seems reasonable. Could be lower with more competition but it seems they have a lead over other services.<p><i>&gt;How does that work? All the money is split across all streams. But the system also concerns the share of one artist within all those streams. So let&#x27;s say Drake is responsible for five percent of all streams, then five percent of all money has to go to Drake.</i><p>And it seems like it&#x27;s proportional to the usage.<p><i>&gt;Is it unfair?</i><p><i>&gt;Of course, that&#x27;s okay if you enjoy listening to Drake. But what if you never do? Then it&#x27;s actually a bit weird since your money goes to Drake while you never listen to his music. That&#x27;s why some artists think that you should only pay for the artists you actually stream. And not that everything is lumped together and then distributed.</i><p>And then this seems to try and contradict that? What&#x27;s unfair here? Are they giving a bigger share to artists that are played across more users and not more streams?
评论 #28353812 未加载
评论 #28353781 未加载
评论 #28353755 未加载
评论 #28353848 未加载
minxomat超过 3 年前
Subscriber Share[1] is the solution. Envato has done it, SoundCloud is doing it. It will never arrive for large music streaming platforms. It&#x27;s not the platforms&#x27; fault. It&#x27;s the rights holders&#x27;.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;medium.com&#x2F;made-by-elements&#x2F;subscriber-share-on-envato-elements-c3aac873657c" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;medium.com&#x2F;made-by-elements&#x2F;subscriber-share-on-enva...</a>
评论 #28353901 未加载
jmcgough超过 3 年前
I thought Spotify shifted away from paying per-stream after Sleepify?<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Sleepify" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Sleepify</a>
tiagod超过 3 年前
&gt;The most generous streaming platform is Napster. The online music store pays the artist $1 for every 53 streams, followed by Tidal<p>&gt;[...]<p>&gt;If you are a listener and it&#x27;s vital for you to support artists, you can start using TIDAL instead of another music streaming platform<p>Why TIDAL and not Napster? Weird plug
评论 #28354074 未加载
评论 #28354150 未加载
评论 #28353974 未加载
评论 #28354026 未加载
czechdeveloper超过 3 年前
Then they honestly loose money with me. I listen probably whole work day (in reality more). That is 8 hours, cca 4 minutes per song = 120 songs a day. That means they pay out about 0.5 USD per day for me. Let&#x27;s say not all days, but just 25 days a month (i listen weekends too) would mean 12.5 USD paid out.<p>I pay 9.99 EUR for family (11.8 USD). There are other people on my account.
评论 #28353751 未加载
评论 #28354180 未加载
tick_tock_tick超过 3 年前
That sees crazy high? I assume this is one of those things where a massive amount of subscribers barely stream anything and that&#x27;s how they can justify such a large payout?
评论 #28353747 未加载
zpeti超过 3 年前
Isn&#x27;t is total subscription revenue divided by number of songs played?<p>How is that coming to $0.004 per stream spotifies fault? What are they supposed to do?
评论 #28354080 未加载
rapht超过 3 年前
The source of those stats is not clear enough in my opinion.<p>Is the &quot;per-stream&quot; measure a result to try and have a comparable basis between the various actors, or is it really the only underlying factor in the calculation (beside the country which is mentionned as another factor)?<p>My guess would be that services would pay per minute-stream, not per stream. Otherwise, artists that tend to have longer form would not be willing to participate (I&#x27;m a big fan of Keith Jarrett, for instance, whose solo concerts mostly consist of tracks of around 40 minutes). You could also imagine hybrid models with bounds that de-linearize certain factors.<p>Looking at a very aggregate average is a recipe for erroneous conclusions...
评论 #28354049 未加载
kleiba超过 3 年前
Isn&#x27;t the actual music just an ad for the real product, tours and merchandise?
评论 #28353767 未加载
评论 #28353749 未加载
tibbydudeza超过 3 年前
During heydays of CD sales in 2000&#x27;s the artist&#x2F;band used get $7.68 per CD.<p>Merch and concerts has always been the money maker but obviously the last 2 years put paid to that.
BlasDeLezo超过 3 年前
Jack Stratton&#x27;s Vulfpeck 2018 “To understand their artist payout, you need a new currency. I call it the ‘The Pity.’ There are a hundred pennies in a dollar and a hundred pitties in a penny. On a given play the artist will make about 60 pitties and that rate seems to be dropping”<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=LB1sTH7bUQ4" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=LB1sTH7bUQ4</a>
newobj超过 3 年前
that much? [as in: i would have expected less. NOT as in: they deserve less]
评论 #28353725 未加载
88840-8855超过 3 年前
How about production cost for music? I have no figures for that but I can imagine that producing (most) music has become cheaper.<p>Further, I would put the hypothesis into the room that the revenue mix has also shifted. From selling music to selling tickets, merch, etc.<p>Any ideas on those two things?
评论 #28353919 未加载
评论 #28353777 未加载
fundatus超过 3 年前
The most interesting takeaway for me from this article is that Apple Music doesn&#x27;t actually pay 1ct per stream unlike what is often suggested. Also that it is closer to Spotify than it is to Napster or Tidal when it comes to payouts per stream.
评论 #28354069 未加载
azinman2超过 3 年前
Doesn’t the article seem to contradict itself in YouTube paying the most?<p>I’d love to see a comparison with what artists we’re getting paid from iTunes before this streaming model.
stacker8888超过 3 年前
Wow, YouTube is abysmal! What do we expect from a platform forged by piracy?
评论 #28353793 未加载
slac超过 3 年前
In most cases they pay the record labels and not the artists, correct?
hdjjhhvvhga超过 3 年前
A well-done advertorial of their (terribly expensive) Smart Links product.
lmilcin超过 3 年前
How ironic that Napster, of all, is paying highest rate?
评论 #28354090 未加载
anoncow超过 3 年前
How much does Spotify make per stream on an average?
Shadonototro超过 3 年前
$400k for only just 100M streams? that&#x27;s a lot of money<p>only people with $AAPL in their portfolio can be against this<p>Playing your music in the metro doesn&#x27;t automatically give you money, a stream shouldn&#x27;t automatically give you money<p>Music is art, you offer your art, and it&#x27;s up to the person to choose to support you<p>If you can&#x27;t get your art to people, you can&#x27;t expect people to support you<p>Stream != engagement
评论 #28387075 未加载