TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The rich get richer and rates get lower

66 点作者 bifftastic超过 3 年前

7 条评论

mattmcknight超过 3 年前
I wonder if this is an artifact of how they are looking at the savings rate. If you think of someone wealthy like Bezos, he is rich on paper because the value of his shares of Amazon increased. This is not taking any liquidity out of the system. It&#x27;s not &quot;excess savings&quot; because it&#x27;s not income that is being saved.<p>Of course, he isn&#x27;t typical of the top decile, but is typical of the most wealthy. I wonder if this is a bit like Piketty, where the driver was actually real estate appreciation. For the top decile, they are are still putting the most money into real estate, and the prices continue to be bid up. Real estate is where prices are most directly driven by interest rates that allow people to borrow ever more. So maybe their &quot;excess savings&quot; is just bidding up the price of housing.
评论 #28367700 未加载
msandford超过 3 年前
We have an entity which literally fixes the interest rate through a variety of methods and yet we&#x27;re talking about why rates are the way they are. Boggles the mind.<p>It&#x27;d be like arguing about why rents aren&#x27;t going up in a rent controlled neighborhood. &quot;Because there&#x27;s excess housing and not enough renters&quot; doesn&#x27;t seem to really explain the process.
评论 #28367445 未加载
评论 #28367343 未加载
评论 #28367329 未加载
henron超过 3 年前
As long as the real rate of return is positive and wealthy people have a higher income or save a higher percentage of their income, inequality will increase. Hence inequality almost(?) always increases in times of stability. You don&#x27;t need low interest rates to tell that story.
评论 #28367644 未加载
michael1999超过 3 年前
I&#x27;ve thought that the baby boom savings cycle explained most of it, but neat to see some numbers contesting that. But this paper seems to assume that US asset prices are determined entirely by domestic demand which seems wild in a world awash with sovereign wealth funds, pension plans, diversified savers, and emerging market wealth seeking a safe haven.<p>I see some work attributing pensions, etc. to demographic deciles, but ctrl-F &quot;foreign&quot; comes up 0.<p>Does anyone know of any estimates of what fraction of net inflow into US financial assets are domestic vs foreign?
robfig超过 3 年前
As a millenial with a good chunk of his net worth in property, it seems clear that real estate prices are inflated by the Govt via mortgage rates, and I am super nervous about how this plays out now that they are near zero in conjunction with QE. Nowhere to go but down? Yikes
评论 #28369728 未加载
sebastianconcpt超过 3 年前
There is no problem in the rich getting richer, the problem is that we need to smooth the friction for more and more people to grow.
评论 #28381178 未加载
stuaxo超过 3 年前
The rich take money out of the system and further entrench their position.
评论 #28368296 未加载