TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Intermediate Algebra

145 点作者 picture将近 4 年前

8 条评论

alexdowad超过 3 年前
When a book is titled "Algebra", it's always a bit ambiguous whether that means "high school algebra" or "abstract algebra". I clicked on this link thinking it was about group/field/ring/etc theory and wondering what an 'intermediate' treatment of those topics would look like.
评论 #28442394 未加载
评论 #28441942 未加载
评论 #28444140 未加载
评论 #28443039 未加载
评论 #28442691 未加载
xphos超过 3 年前
Sorry for the rant but as a math lover this is terrible. In my experience "algebra 2" is taught for multiple years and is in my opinion the most boring soul crushing math I was taught. And I say taught because its forced into you with very few interesting observations and thinking. It focuses on memorizing formula's a procedures, which while these things have there applications I don't consider someone who can say y=mx+b or the a^2+b^2=c^2 knows much about math or more importantly engages with things in a mathematical way. I think there is this focus to produce calculators when you want thinkers and maybe and I hope this has changed in the last 10 years (age 24) but I feel like the American middle school level produces bad math habits and skills wrapped around solving test questions instead of thinking.
评论 #28444759 未加载
mieses超过 3 年前
Why are the author (John Redden) and acknowledgements removed from the github.io version?<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;scholar.flatworldknowledge.com&#x2F;books&#x2F;4372&#x2F;fwk-redden-ata" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;scholar.flatworldknowledge.com&#x2F;books&#x2F;4372&#x2F;fwk-redden...</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;open.umn.edu&#x2F;opentextbooks&#x2F;textbooks&#x2F;134" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;open.umn.edu&#x2F;opentextbooks&#x2F;textbooks&#x2F;134</a>
评论 #28443460 未加载
Miiko超过 3 年前
Not sure what&#x27;s the point of section 4.3 Factoring Trinomials introducing &quot;trial and error (or guess and check) method&quot;, when this task can be solved easily without any trial and errors, by using 6.2 Quadratic Formula. Shouldn&#x27;t section 4.3 at least mention that possibility?<p>Is there something I do not understand here?
评论 #28444398 未加载
评论 #28442294 未加载
wly_cdgr超过 3 年前
Hide the answers by default, yo. It&#x27;s so easy to do with an e-book, come onnnnnn
coderinsg将近 4 年前
Really helpful way to start understanding the symbols. Clearly written.
kwhitefoot超过 3 年前
Why does it need a calculator?
Gehinnn将近 4 年前
&gt; Irrational numbers are defined as any numbers that cannot be written as a ratio of two integers.<p>&gt; Finally, the set of real numbers, denoted R, is defined as the set of all rational numbers combined with the set of all irrational numbers.<p>I&#x27;m sorry, this is not how math works. Reals are basically defined as number. But what is a number?<p>Also the definition of Q is missing the quotient construction (or any motivation of how to deal with ka&#x2F;kb = a&#x2F;b).
评论 #28438915 未加载
评论 #28439216 未加载
评论 #28439076 未加载
评论 #28438935 未加载
评论 #28439569 未加载
评论 #28439707 未加载