TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

HiFive Unmatched – A RISC-V Linux development platform

107 点作者 velmu超过 3 年前

9 条评论

johndoe0815超过 3 年前
It&#x27;s also a nice Haiku platform - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;discuss.haiku-os.org&#x2F;t&#x2F;my-progress-on-real-risc-v-hardware&#x2F;10963&#x2F;31" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;discuss.haiku-os.org&#x2F;t&#x2F;my-progress-on-real-risc-v-ha...</a><p>However, the &quot;HiFive Unmatched HW Reference Manual&quot; mentioned on the SiFive web page (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sifive.com&#x2F;boards&#x2F;hifive-unmatched" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sifive.com&#x2F;boards&#x2F;hifive-unmatched</a>) is still not available, so bare-metal programming (or porting other operating systems) requires lots of Linux code reading.
rwmj超过 3 年前
I have two (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;rwmj.wordpress.com&#x2F;2021&#x2F;05&#x2F;27&#x2F;hifive-unmatched&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;rwmj.wordpress.com&#x2F;2021&#x2F;05&#x2F;27&#x2F;hifive-unmatched&#x2F;</a>) so I guess ask me anything ...
评论 #28479710 未加载
评论 #28481682 未加载
评论 #28484546 未加载
评论 #28482453 未加载
评论 #28480199 未加载
mrlonglong超过 3 年前
At £500+ it&#x27;s not a realistic prospect I&#x27;m afraid. Maybe if there more affordable ones that becomes available then I definitely would want to take a look in-depth.
评论 #28479241 未加载
评论 #28481688 未加载
评论 #28485041 未加载
sydthrowaway超过 3 年前
Are there any good &lt;$100 RISC-V dev boards out?
评论 #28479845 未加载
评论 #28480180 未加载
cestith超过 3 年前
For a limited-run dev board with the CPU, board, and that much RAM I&#x27;d say it&#x27;s priced fairly appropriately.
bserge超过 3 年前
Why not solder the SSDs and a GPU while at it?
pjmlp超过 3 年前
So does it already have Swift support by now?
评论 #28479588 未加载
gigatexal超过 3 年前
what GPUs are compatible with this?
评论 #28480144 未加载
评论 #28480027 未加载
ncmncm超过 3 年前
I find my enthusiasm for RISC-V materially reduced by its appalling lack of a base POPCOUNT instruction. Its lack makes my favorite optimizations annoyingly pessimal.<p>I understand that, <i>someday</i>, higher-end realizations will begin to ship with various &quot;B&quot; subsets implemented, but &quot;portable&quot; builds will tend to avoid relying on those for an appallingly long time after. (E.g. MSVC and Gcc still do not generate POPCNT instructions, on amd64, unless you specifically identify a post-2004 target.)<p>I will nonetheless be excited to learn of the first chip that does ship with the full raft of B instructions.
评论 #28480178 未加载
评论 #28480273 未加载
评论 #28480419 未加载
评论 #28480582 未加载