TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Money creation in the modern economy (2014) [pdf]

76 点作者 porterde超过 3 年前

11 条评论

aazaa超过 3 年前
From the conclusion:<p>&gt; This article has discussed how money is created in the modern economy. Most of the money in circulation is created, not by the printing presses of the Bank of England, but by the commercial banks themselves: banks create money whenever they lend to someone in the economy or buy an asset from consumers. And in contrast to descriptions found in some textbooks, the Bank of England does not directly control the quantity of either base or broad money. The Bank of England is nevertheless still able to influence the amount of money in the economy. It does so in normal times by setting monetary policy — through the interest rate that it pays on reserves held by commercial banks with the Bank of England. More recently, though, with Bank Rate constrained by the effective lower bound, the Bank of England’s asset purchase programme has sought to raise the quantity of broad money in circulation. This in turn affects the prices and quantities of a range of assets in the economy, including money.<p>The discussion seems incomplete without mentioning government deficit spending. This is, after all, the premise of Modern Monetary Theory: that unlike households, currency issuers like the US federal government aren&#x27;t under the same balanced budget constraints as households. Currency issuers can create money by spending it into being.<p>Budget deficits can be financed through the issuance of bonds, which look a lot like loans. But they can also be financed by just printing the money. The end result is the same, money into the pockets of people, but the implications are very different.<p>The MMT perspective is gaining ground, especially as the world&#x27;s governments find it increasingly difficult to avoid deficit spending. A leading proponent (Kelton) proposes ditching deficit targets altogether in favor of inflation targets.
评论 #28474520 未加载
评论 #28475218 未加载
评论 #28475172 未加载
评论 #28475210 未加载
评论 #28475213 未加载
评论 #28474475 未加载
评论 #28474577 未加载
评论 #28475034 未加载
rahimnathwani超过 3 年前
Some of the content is in this short video: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=CvRAqR2pAgw" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=CvRAqR2pAgw</a><p>Money is created by both the central bank and retail banks.<p>When the Bank of England buys an asset, it pays in newly-created pounds. These pounds are an obligation of the central bank, i.e. a debt owed by the bank. So these pounds are &#x27;central bank money&#x27;.<p>When a commercial or retail bank gives you a loan, you have two accounts at the bank that move in opposite directions:<p>- current account is credited by $X (bank owes you money)<p>- loan account is debited by $X (you owe the bank)<p>So the net effect is zero (the sum of all your balances with the bank is still the same as before the loan was made). But now there&#x27;s more money in your current account, so there&#x27;s more money available for you to spend. Money has been created.<p>Even though this new money isn&#x27;t central bank money:<p>- it&#x27;s denominated in the same units as central bank money (pounds)<p>- it&#x27;s almost as safe from default (it&#x27;s protected by a deposit guarantee scheme)<p>- you can use it to pay for things (bank transfers are widely accepted as a means of payment)<p>In practice, there are capital adequacy requirements that limit how much banks can lend. They are required to keep a buffer between assets and liabilities (equity capital). As the bank&#x27;s balance sheet gets bigger, more equity capital is required.
评论 #28474349 未加载
评论 #28474383 未加载
dang超过 3 年前
Some past threads:<p><i>Money Creation in the Modern Economy</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=25885849" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=25885849</a> - Jan 2021 (1 comment)<p><i>Money Creation in the modern economy [pdf]</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=22923785" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=22923785</a> - April 2020 (1 comment)<p><i>Money Creation in the Modern Economy</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=20875899" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=20875899</a> - Sept 2019 (1 comment)<p><i>Money creation in the modern economy (2014) [pdf]</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=16604251" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=16604251</a> - March 2018 (123 comments)<p><i>Money Creation in the Modern Economy (2014) [pdf]</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=11374907" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=11374907</a> - March 2016 (97 comments)
SkyMarshal超过 3 年前
I think Richard Werner&#x27;s empirical research on how banks create money is probably better than anything put out by the banking system itself, including the central banks.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.researchgate.net&#x2F;publication&#x2F;265909749_Can_Banks_Individually_Create_Money_Out_of_Nothing_-_The_Theories_and_the_Empirical_Evidence" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.researchgate.net&#x2F;publication&#x2F;265909749_Can_Banks...</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.researchgate.net&#x2F;publication&#x2F;283907413_Do_banks_really_create_money_out_of_nothing_Another_empirical_test_of_the_three_theories_of_banking" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.researchgate.net&#x2F;publication&#x2F;283907413_Do_banks_...</a><p>His work made realize that not even the banking system fully understands the banking system.<p>(Werner is the economist that coined the term Quantitative Easing, originally created to describe Japanese post-WWII economic re-development monetary policy, research that later informed the US Fed&#x27;s response to the GFC, among other things)
评论 #28474347 未加载
zja超过 3 年前
I remember David Graeber mentioned this report in “Against Economics”[1]. It’s a pretty interesting read if you like reading about MMT. [1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;theanarchistlibrary.org&#x2F;library&#x2F;david-graeber-against-economics" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;theanarchistlibrary.org&#x2F;library&#x2F;david-graeber-agains...</a>
danielschonfeld超过 3 年前
The comments in this thread prove yet again that economics is a far cry from any science. Nobody really understands why this system of credit actually works as well as it does and even more troubling is what will be it&#x27;s next iteration given that it&#x27;s starting to crumble.<p>Unfortunately for most of us though it appears as though the adage that &#x27;cash is trash&#x27; is starting to become a very real problem even in the west and necessitates that all of us transition to holding yield producing assets with risk. In other words, even grandma is an investor (aka gambler) now by force.
1vuio0pswjnm7超过 3 年前
&quot;Let us never forget this fundamental truth: the State has no source of money other than money which people earn themselves. If the State wishes to spend more it can do so only by borrowing your savings or by taxing you more. It is no good thinking that someone else will pay-that &quot;someone else&quot; is you. There is no such thing as public money; there is only taxpayers&#x27; money.&quot;<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20110606031420&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.margaretthatcher.org&#x2F;document&#x2F;105454" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20110606031420&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.margar...</a><p>In England, sometimes we need to explain to us where money comes from, just in case anyone forgets. :)
gandalfian超过 3 年前
Though todays big question is &quot;How do you destroy money?&quot; ie get it back?.<p>You can tax and not spend but so much money has escaped abroad and hidden where you can&#x27;t touch it.<p>There is inflation but that is a dangerous pandoras box.<p>Or you can say boost productivity and just create enough extra stuff to match all the extra money. Easier to say than to do though. You just have to live in hope that someone invents some wonderfully productivity enhancing something, fusion, robots or ai perhaps. Come to think of it perhaps Apple is really a government conspiracy to soak up consumers excess dollars? The Apple Tax suddenly fits hmmm.
andy_ppp超过 3 年前
I sometimes wonder how anything about economics can be tested when the world’s manufacturing has been outsourced to China. All of these theories rest on the fact inflation has been largely under control in the west, not because of a lack of gold standard but because almost all physical items have had zero or negative inflation for 30 years or so. All the things not “Made in China” I would say have been massively inflated. If we were to start having to produce say plumbing supplies locally (say due to Climate change) will these theoretical money creation mechanisms still work?
评论 #28474527 未加载
mempko超过 3 年前
This is a MUST READ for any adult.<p>Money literally runs our lives. We spend most of our waking time trying to get some.<p>This explains where money comes from. And it&#x27;s completely different than what you are taught in school or by media and economist pundits.
nabla9超过 3 年前
This is outdated. Maybe Bank of England still operates like this?<p>Major central banks like US Fed, European ECB or Bank of Japan don&#x27;t generate money using fractional reserve banking anymore.<p>They use open market operations or quantitative easing instead. In other words, they buy debt, like treasuries with money.
评论 #28474180 未加载
评论 #28474061 未加载
评论 #28474233 未加载