TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

High Performance Organizations Reading List

229 点作者 bfoks超过 3 年前

10 条评论

Aeolun超过 3 年前
My problem with reading all of these tomes (and by now I’ve read a few), is that while <i>I</i> appear to be aware of what works for a software team, my management does not, hasn’t read these, or just plain doesn’t care.<p>I need a guide on how to teach people that have a vested interest in not acknowledging that there might have been a problem in the first place.
评论 #28521805 未加载
评论 #28521677 未加载
评论 #28520103 未加载
physicsgraph超过 3 年前
Similar pages: [0,1,2] and my own list, [3]<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;LappleApple&#x2F;awesome-leading-and-managing" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;LappleApple&#x2F;awesome-leading-and-managing</a><p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;kdeldycke&#x2F;awesome-engineering-team-management" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;kdeldycke&#x2F;awesome-engineering-team-manage...</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;ankitjaininfo&#x2F;awesome-managers" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;ankitjaininfo&#x2F;awesome-managers</a><p>[3] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;graphthinking.blogspot.com&#x2F;2021&#x2F;04&#x2F;reading-list-for-professional.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;graphthinking.blogspot.com&#x2F;2021&#x2F;04&#x2F;reading-list-for-...</a>
fungiblecog超过 3 年前
The trouble with all of these great ideas is that while the management&#x2F;leadership&#x2F;whatever may claim they want to solve these problems - they actually don’t want these kinds of solutions.<p>What they want is to maintain the power structure that got them where they are - and want to remain - at all costs.<p>It’s like asking politicians who got elected using the current system to reform it. It ain’t gonna happen.
评论 #28519097 未加载
harshreality超过 3 年前
Everyday Astronaut&#x27;s walk and talk with Elon Musk where he attempts to explain his management process, starts at 13:30 of part 1: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=t705r8ICkRw&amp;t=13m30s" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=t705r8ICkRw&amp;t=13m30s</a><p>Here&#x27;s a rough summary:<p>1. Make requirements less dumb.<p>2. Delete part or process steps. If you&#x27;re not occasionally adding things back (he says 10%) (ideally in improved versions), you&#x27;re not removing things often enough.<p>3. Simplify, optimize, solve. Everyone&#x27;s trained to jump to this because the educational process requires you to answer a question as posed, when often the question is dumb and shouldn&#x27;t be dealt with as-stated.<p>4. Accelerate process<p>5. Automate<p>Those tend to blur together at the edges. I&#x27;m sure if he formalized this and wrote it down for mass consumption it&#x27;d be presented differently, but it&#x27;s his current mental model.<p>Process testing - remove unnecessary in-process testing after production line debugging is done. Obviously there are nuances, he&#x27;s not saying to do no in-process testing, but rather to remove testing which was intended to reveal information once that&#x27;s already been collected and addressed. He cautions about false positives from in-process testing, and notes most testing can be done end of line with acceptable results.<p>Finally, it&#x27;s important to understand the context. The part about part&#x2F;step deletion in particular, when things get added back 10% of the time, is not appropriate for all development processes. That would have to be adjusted a the specific product and market objective.
评论 #28521341 未加载
评论 #28517976 未加载
mu_killnine超过 3 年前
As someone who is literally starting an IT department from scratch, this is a really exciting list for me to dig into. There are old favorites like &#x27;mythical man month&#x27; that I&#x27;m generally aware of, though never actually read personally, and whole new blogs and videos to sift through. Thanks for this.
评论 #28518091 未加载
评论 #28517323 未加载
评论 #28517483 未加载
CalChris超过 3 年前
I&#x27;m surprised Andy Grove&#x27;s <i>High Output Management</i> wasn&#x27;t on the list.
loughnane超过 3 年前
I had a suspicion that there was a significant recency bias, so I clicked on the first 19 amazon links and looked at the published dates.<p>- 1988 - 1<p>- 1999 - 1<p>- 2000 - 1<p>- 2002 - 1<p>- 2005 - 1<p>- 2007 - 2<p>- 2008 - 1<p>- 2012 - 1<p>- 2013 - 1<p>- 2014 - 2<p>- 2015 - 3<p>- 2016 - 3<p>- 2017 - 1<p>I&#x27;m also reminded of the the recent post on The Creative World&#x27;s Bullshit Industrial Complex [0]. There are some gems in here but I can&#x27;t help but feel like a lot of them are just uninspired remixes of what came before. The list I want to see is of the &quot;great management books&quot;. Ones that:<p>- had an effect on firms both in the time the book was published and in subsequent business &quot;generations&quot;<p>- influenced subsequent works of note.<p>- remain relevant to business today<p>Where is that list?<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=28459533" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=28459533</a>
评论 #28524581 未加载
sandworm101超过 3 年前
Yup. These are exactly the sort of exec speak that I expect up-and-coming managers read. They aren&#x27;t exactly fads but nor are they longstanding respected works. Most will probably still be read in a couple years, but very few will survive twenty. Where are the great works that will improve a person&#x27;s written language? Where are the seminal works on market theory? Where are the histories? My kingdom for an executive who can string together a cohesive paragraph.
评论 #28520414 未加载
评论 #28520447 未加载
aluciani超过 3 年前
Great resource thanks for sharing. Lots of titles and resources that I have never considered. Super useful :)
aktuel超过 3 年前
What a BS parade. You don&#x27;t become a real person by reading on how to become a real person.
评论 #28519688 未加载
评论 #28518452 未加载