TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ledger of Harms

173 点作者 MrsPeaches超过 3 年前

12 条评论

sva_超过 3 年前
It reminds me of something odd I heard recently. There seems to be a growing consensus that the Turing test is not an adequate measure of intelligence, and many argue Turing was misunderstood; that too much significance was given to the test.<p>Now the Amazon folks came along with the &quot;Alexa prize&quot;. Whoever creates a bot, that people want to spend the longest duration of time with, wins. So maximal user engagement is seen as measure of intelligence.<p>I find it really weird that our tools seem to seek to waste the largest amount of time for us. I would&#x27;ve thought, that the ideal assistant would minimize engagement time, while maximizing utility; and it also seemed to me like a product like that would easily blow the time-wasting competition out of the water.<p>But it doesn&#x27;t seem so. Maybe too early in the development...
评论 #28550552 未加载
评论 #28549781 未加载
评论 #28550311 未加载
评论 #28551829 未加载
评论 #28553802 未加载
评论 #28550212 未加载
评论 #28550404 未加载
评论 #28549747 未加载
roenxi超过 3 年前
The perspective this site offers is valuable; but they suffer from not having a baseline.<p>One that stuck out to me is &quot;Technology integrates and often amplifies racism, sexism, ableism and homophobia&quot;. This seems unreasonable - all of these things were substantially worse before technology got involved. Technology seems to blunting the sting, enabling more effective organisation among minorities and promoting a better understanding of the problem.<p>It seems likely that many of these problems were much worse before the big social media companies too.
评论 #28551559 未加载
评论 #28550193 未加载
评论 #28550352 未加载
HPsquared超过 3 年前
Grammatical nitpick: don&#x27;t call your information a set of factoids.<p>&quot;1. An inaccurate statement or statistic believed to be true because of broad repetition, especially if cited in the media.<p>2. (originally Canada, US) An interesting item of trivia; a minor fact.&quot;
评论 #28550152 未加载
评论 #28550323 未加载
评论 #28553815 未加载
mettamage超过 3 年前
For what this comment is worth: I&#x27;m watching too much YouTube and it&#x27;s screwing with my life. Underneath it is a desire to have more social relationships I think. My previous &quot;addiction&quot; was Facebook, years ago. Since then it has been YouTube.
评论 #28550313 未加载
评论 #28549342 未加载
评论 #28549286 未加载
评论 #28556482 未加载
评论 #28549846 未加载
评论 #28551999 未加载
__MatrixMan__超过 3 年前
I feel like this is a bit too tech centric. Poor dopamine hygiene will ruin your life. Doesn&#x27;t really matter if you&#x27;re hooked on twitter or methamphetamine.<p>People who profit from encouraging poor dopamine hygiene will have an outsized influence on the people they&#x27;ve hooked, doesn&#x27;t matter if you&#x27;re managing an ad campaign in the US or part of the opium pipeline in Afghanistan.
评论 #28555366 未加载
Timsmits超过 3 年前
We&#x27;ve been building an app to help you to make your smartphone screentime more conscious and we&#x27;ve just opened the beta this week! &lt;<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;play.google.com&#x2F;store&#x2F;apps&#x2F;details?id=com.unpluq.beta&amp;referrer=utm_source%3Dhackernews%26utm_medium%3Dpost%26utm_campaign%3Dhackernews_post" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;play.google.com&#x2F;store&#x2F;apps&#x2F;details?id=com.unpluq.bet...</a>&gt;<p>It basically blocks distracting apps by default and gives you a barrier to open them like shaking your phone for a couple of seconds! Eager to hear what any of you think of it!
nodejs_rulez_1超过 3 年前
There should be something more specific about Tinder there. Cannot see how two-parent family units will not decline even further over the next few decades (not the only factor there of course but asking for government hand-outs is not the solution either).
评论 #28552290 未加载
quantafire超过 3 年前
This posted also in the last 24hrs: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=28544615" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=28544615</a>
mthwsjc_超过 3 年前
Why is this being called a ledger? Is it a special kind of list?
评论 #28549521 未加载
评论 #28549453 未加载
amelius超过 3 年前
This gives an unbalanced view, as it leaves out all the benefits of social media, such as watching funny videos, watching friends have a good time on holidays, staying &quot;in the loop&quot; with gossip, staying informed about events, releasing anger about political issues, and such.
评论 #28551549 未加载
dj_mc_merlin超过 3 年前
I feel that a lot of these aren&#x27;t necessarily harms, just a change in how things are done.<p>&gt; Children who have been cyberbullied are 3x more likely to contemplate suicide compared to their peers.<p>&gt; Children who experienced cyberbullying during their adolescence were significantly more likely to engage in risk-taking health behavior as adults.<p>Yes, bullying is bad. Now kids can get bullied online. Such is the way of things.<p>&gt; About 40% of 13-17 year olds reported it was “normal for people my age to share nudes with each other.”<p>.. so? People used polaroids before. It was harder so it was done less often, but done it was.<p>&gt; Children who see videos of child influencers holding unhealthy foods consume significantly more calories than those who see influencers holding other types of objects, as clearly shown by experiments using randomized control trials.<p>In other news: researchers rediscover priming is a real effect.<p>&gt; More than half US middle-schoolers cannot distinguish advertising from real news, or fact from fiction.<p>That&#x27;s how its always been. Don&#x27;t most people have a memory of being a kid around that age, and have your parents blow your mind by suggesting that not everything you see on TV is true?<p>&gt; 77% of teenagers get their news from social media, with 39% stating that they “often” get news from celebrities, influencers, or personalities, according to a survey of over 800 teens aged 13-18.<p>Ah, so they should get their news from the TV or newspaper instead. Much more reliable, right? All news is dogshit, and various levels of lies. If you&#x27;ve ever been the center of a news story, you know that they literally lie and pull stuff out of nowhere constantly. Its made my jaw drop before.<p>&gt; 30% teens report that they pay “very little attention” to considering the source from which they are getting their news on social media.<p>So 70% pay more than &quot;very little attention&quot; (phrasing!). I&#x27;d say most teens are actually better at discerning scams&#x2F;obviously misleading content online than non-techie 50+ year olds, as long as it doesn&#x27;t align with their biases (but that&#x27;s a universal problem).<p>&gt; Several self-harming videos have been circulating on TikTok, from the &quot;Skull breaker&quot; challenge to the &quot;Cha Cha Slide&quot; challenge (which involves repeatedly swerving a car across a road in time to music).<p>BREAKING NEWS: what do the bracelets around your child&#x27;s wrist mean? Could they be engaging in secret parties where they take drugs and suck dick?<p>This is fearmongering.<p>&gt; The number of US teenagers who are online continuously is increasing at a dramatic pace, almost doubling from 2015 to 2018: 24% to 45%.<p>Because the internet is taking over the world.
评论 #28551424 未加载
评论 #28551600 未加载
评论 #28550418 未加载
评论 #28550011 未加载
moron4hire超过 3 年前
Okay, I just woke up, still a bit cross-eyed. I read the title as &quot;Ledger of Hams&quot; and expected a proto-food-blogger writing a log of all the hams he ever ate, how they compared to his &quot;ieal&quot; ham, and attempts to create a mathematical model of &quot;the perfect ham&quot;. Now I want to read <i>that</i> piece.