Poorly written article, weak arguments, link-bait title.<p>I think it's a bit weird to use Mark Zuckerburg as an example here. How is Facebook a "money burning doomsday device"? It's one of the most successful web startups of the past decade (probably <i>the</i> most successful). And calling him a douchebag is just a dick move. Do you know the guy personally?<p>Acquiring skills like "marketing, business management, development" is clearly a great benefit to bootstrapping your own business. It seems like most if not all of the Silicon Valley "darlings" end up having to do this. How are they bad role models for doing exactly what you suggest is good?<p>The failure thing is clearly misunderstood here. No one is praising failure in the generic sense. It's a specific type of failure that involves trying something new and potentially revolutionary. For these kinds of things, it's <i>very</i> hard to know if you can be successful without actually trying it out. The failure is only bad if you don't learn something from it. Even if you don't, someone else likely will, and can build a better business based on a modification of your failed idea.<p>Regarding the money: no one is forcing angels and VCs to invest. They do so of their own volition, and in as an informed or uninformed manner as they so choose.<p>If we have such an insane attitude toward money and business, why is SV still a leading region for innovation and economic output? Clearly we're doing <i>something</i> right. We're not perfect, but why not direct your ire at entities that really <i>are</i> destroying wealth, like our friends on Wall Street, or, hell, the US government?