TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Adguard Letter of Support to Quad9

78 点作者 NmAmDa超过 3 年前

5 条评论

oofabz超过 3 年前
Quad9 is based in Switzerland, so the German court should only have jurisdiction over whatever servers are in Germany. It seems like the worst case scenario is that Quad9 shuts down their German servers, but still serves German requests from servers in neighboring countries.<p>That said this is still terrible and I hope the German court reconsiders their decision. The free flow of information is more valuable than protecting copyrights, because the former benefits many more people. Most of the copyright holders who feel threatened by piracy are not even German! The court is protecting big American businesses over individual Germans.
评论 #28601107 未加载
ignoramous超过 3 年前
&gt; <i>The spendings will only grow as more and more similar court rulings are handed out (which without a doubt will come eventually). It will become near impossible to uphold a DNS service, and all small DNS resolvers will vanish.</i><p>I run one such <i>small</i> public DNS (DoH-only) resolver (primarily popular in countries where censorship is low to moderate), and know several other folks who do. Just the other day we were discussing the implications of this ruling, but coming from a country with dismal digital&#x2F;internet freedom track-record, this made me sit back and contemplate for a bit (unblocking access to censored web properties <i>may</i> soon be a crime as the government here bids to criminalise VPNs):<p>I believe, the inevitable over-regulation and insurmountable legal threats are going to ruin it for the hobbyists who thrive at the fringes. Internet may soon go the way of the telecom industry. Controlled by a few, regulated to oblivion, with high barriers to entry.<p>I hope I am wrong.
anonymousisme超过 3 年前
I do not understand why more people don&#x27;t switch to a decentralized DNS such as OpenNIC (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.opennic.org" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.opennic.org</a>)<p>Governments have abused their control of DNS. A distributed system (with trust and safeguards) is the better way.
评论 #28600823 未加载
评论 #28599667 未加载
评论 #28600781 未加载
评论 #28599706 未加载
CivBase超过 3 年前
&gt; Hamburg Germany court (310 O 99&#x2F;21) has recently sent a notice to Quad9 (a standard recursive DNS resolver) demanding to stop resolving certain domains for all residents in Germany on request from Sony Music GmbH. According to Sony, those domains in question are infringing on properties that they claim are covered by their copyrights.<p>This would be like a German court ordering Yellowbook to stop listing the phone number for a DVD store because they were known to sell bootleg copies of Sony movies. What a joke.
评论 #28598954 未加载
propogandist超过 3 年前
Quad9 was co-created by IBM, they will bow the knee to preserve government contracts and big R&amp;D bets in Germany<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.forbes.com&#x2F;sites&#x2F;moorinsights&#x2F;2021&#x2F;06&#x2F;15&#x2F;ibm-and-fraunhofer-announce-german-quantum-computing-partnership&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.forbes.com&#x2F;sites&#x2F;moorinsights&#x2F;2021&#x2F;06&#x2F;15&#x2F;ibm-and...</a>
评论 #28604899 未加载