TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Wuhan scientists planned to release coronaviruses in cave bats in 2018

81 点作者 AndrewBissell超过 3 年前

10 条评论

noptd超过 3 年前
Wow, the linked article about the Lancet letter which shutdown debate on a potential lab origin back in March of last year is pretty damning as well - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;dXc0n" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;dXc0n</a><p>Excerpt:<p>&gt; All but one scientist who penned a letter in The Lancet dismissing the possibility that coronavirus could have come from a lab in Wuhan were linked to its Chinese researchers, their colleagues or funders, a Telegraph investigation can reveal.
belter超过 3 年前
If you posted any of this on Facebook a few months ago ...You would be labeled a nutter, registered on an invisible check list as a conspiracy theorist with your IP shared with other providers...A nicely dressed WHO official would ask you if you have a PhD in Immunology, and would say you cannot possibly know what you are talking about...
findalex超过 3 年前
&gt; &quot;Darpa refused to fund the work, saying: &#x27;It is clear that the proposed project led by Peter Daszak could have put local communities at risk&#x27;&quot;<p>So they pitch this project to both DARPA and NIH... and DARPA says no citing community risk.
musicale超过 3 年前
&gt; “It is clear that the proposed project led by Peter Daszak could have put local communities at risk”<p>It&#x27;s totally safe, trust us - we&#x27;re scientists!<p>&gt; “The scary part is they were making infectious chimeric Mers viruses,” the source said.<p>What could possibly go wrong?
joshuahughes超过 3 年前
14 comments in 14hrs. For comparison, a post about TikTokers trading stocks has 168 comments in the same time.<p>I find it incredible that this bombshell hasn&#x27;t elicited more of a response. Too uncomfortable a subject to discuss perhaps?
评论 #28626053 未加载
评论 #28615415 未加载
评论 #28615741 未加载
nikolay超过 3 年前
No paywall: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;itqJH" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;itqJH</a>
codezero超过 3 年前
This is the original source material I believe: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;drasticresearch.org&#x2F;2021&#x2F;09&#x2F;20&#x2F;1583&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;drasticresearch.org&#x2F;2021&#x2F;09&#x2F;20&#x2F;1583&#x2F;</a><p>Also a link to the original grant (I think!) <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;drasticresearch.files.wordpress.com&#x2F;2021&#x2F;09&#x2F;main-document-preempt-volume-1-no-ess-hr00118s0017-ecohealth-alliance.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;drasticresearch.files.wordpress.com&#x2F;2021&#x2F;09&#x2F;main-doc...</a>
评论 #28614080 未加载
boredumb超过 3 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.yahoo.com&#x2F;wuhan-scientists-planned-release-skin-145326380.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.yahoo.com&#x2F;wuhan-scientists-planned-release-skin...</a><p>this link seems to have the actual text
tuatoru超过 3 年前
&gt; Papers, confirmed as genuine by a former member of the Trump administration<p>Well, they must be totally genuine then.
评论 #28611110 未加载
评论 #28612131 未加载
评论 #28614371 未加载
boredumb超过 3 年前
Pay walled