TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Updated WHO global air quality guidelines

167 点作者 malingo超过 3 年前

9 条评论

dahart超过 3 年前
It took me a few minutes to figure out how to read the Executive Summary (Table 0.1, page xvii).<p>The AQG number is the main recommendation, and refers to the concentration in micrograms per cubic meter (ug&#x2F;m^3). So the report says the world should aim for 5 ug&#x2F;m^3 or less of PM 2.5 annually, and 15 ug&#x2F;m^3 or less PM 10 annually.<p>The interim targets are meant to be realistic goals to set along the way, so anywhere with worse than 75 ug&#x2F;m^3 PM 2.5 on a daily basis might aim for that goal first.<p>I had to check how the concentrations compare to various AQI (Air Quality Index) reports, like my iPhone weather app. 5 ug&#x2F;m^3 of PM 2.5 is an AQI of 21. Currently an AQI of 0-50 is considered “good”, so maybe down the road the scale will be adjusted based on these new recommendations.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.airnow.gov&#x2F;aqi&#x2F;aqi-calculator-concentration&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.airnow.gov&#x2F;aqi&#x2F;aqi-calculator-concentration&#x2F;</a><p>Curious to see what the previous recommendations were, the 2005 report has the same first 3 interim targets for PM 2.5 and PM 10. The current report’s 4th interim target is set to the AQG (final recommendation) level from the previous report, and the new AQG level is now lower than the previous one. This is because there is now stronger statistical evidence of health damage occurring at levels above the new recommendation, the data has shown we needed a new lower threshold.
评论 #28627439 未加载
评论 #28632378 未加载
评论 #28630019 未加载
LurkingPenguin超过 3 年前
I never truly appreciated how valuable good air is until I moved to Asia and experienced weeks at a time living in air with AQIs over 100 and namely high PM2.5 levels.<p>The physical effects of spending even an hour outside are immediately apparent and scary when I contemplate what this would probably do to my health if I rack up years of exposure. It&#x27;s even scarier to think about children who are exposed to this air from birth and grow up inhaling it every time they walk to school, go outside to play, etc.
评论 #28625551 未加载
评论 #28629074 未加载
评论 #28627772 未加载
评论 #28625964 未加载
评论 #28626363 未加载
MrsPeaches超过 3 年前
Any recommendations for air qulity sensors?<p>Quite like this idea, as (I assume) it also makes data available to others: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;airly.org" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;airly.org</a>
评论 #28627475 未加载
评论 #28627590 未加载
评论 #28630518 未加载
评论 #28627949 未加载
评论 #28627139 未加载
rhacker超过 3 年前
Most of my early life I lived in luxurious ~5 - 25 AQI. I live in pretty much the same area (California) and seems like during the summer we are going to suffer through varying levels between 80 and 500 AQI. It&#x27;s a good time to get into the air cleaning industry (hepa, etc...)
eisa01超过 3 年前
How does this compare to current EU guidelines?<p>Air quality in Europe is already in a sorrid state
评论 #28626008 未加载
评论 #28625825 未加载
Tepix超过 3 年前
When looking at air quality in Europe, the west coast of Ireland is the best place to live.
评论 #28627117 未加载
meteo-jeff超过 3 年前
Thanks for posting! This is a good reference to correctly implement and document APIs for Open-Meteo [0].<p>I soon want to integrate CAMS data from the Copernicus Project to offer Air Quality APIs for non-commercial use applications.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;open-meteo.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;open-meteo.com&#x2F;</a>
techsin101超过 3 年前
How does it compare to older guidelines
hendry超过 3 年前
Wonder how Singapore fares ...
评论 #28630129 未加载