TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Elizabeth Holmes Trial: Why Not Other Tech CEOs?

5 点作者 uniformlyrandom超过 3 年前

2 条评论

PragmaticPulp超过 3 年前
These attempts to equate Holmes with other tech CEOs are bizarre.<p>Theranos was a fraudulent company, full stop. They weren’t even a Silicon Valley darling as many VCs famously passed on the company after some due diligence. Their primary investors were family offices like the Cox family, the Walton family, and Rupert Murdoch because they couldn’t get their fraud passed actual tech VCs, who were handing out investment money to everyone else with a decent idea at the time. Even their board and advisers were mostly composed of people with political and other backgrounds unrelated to blood testing or tech.<p>There is no equivalence between Theranos’ outright fraud and other tech CEOs being optimistic about the future of their tech companies. The way the media is trying to downplay their fraud and equate it with other, successful companies is bizarre.
评论 #28654418 未加载
评论 #28657195 未加载
评论 #28654484 未加载
hn_throwaway_99超过 3 年前
Not surprised to see Ellen Pao&#x27;s voice in here, who continues to do a disservice to women everywhere by blaming any situation where a woman fails on sexism.<p>If anything, the rise of Holmes was <i>specifically enabled</i> by the fact that Silicon Valley wanted a &quot;female founder of mythical proportions&quot; so badly that they overlooked some obvious red flags early on.