TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Someone using Ethereum paid a $23.6M transaction fee

20 点作者 reddavis超过 3 年前

2 条评论

ashleyn超过 3 年前
See many comments suggesting irreversible fat-finger transactions are why Ethereum is flawed by design. I would argue immutability is not something inherently flawed - rather, the design of the client software should take more responsibility for warning of a situation like this. And to an extent, if you&#x27;re using a platform that&#x27;s immutable <i>by design</i> you ultimately have some responsibility as a user that can never be done away with. Clients can warn of potentially erroneous transactions all day, but ultimately, an &quot;erroneous transaction&quot; is not something that can be precisely defined. Don&#x27;t dismiss verification dialogs just because they&#x27;re exceedingly common.
评论 #28672593 未加载
gentleman11超过 3 年前
Now we get to watch the apologists come out and say it was the users fault and say how traditional banking and governments are worse. There are already posts like that on other sites covering this story<p>Eg, from Twitter, “people burn themselves while cooking so cooking is flawed”