TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

‘Right to repair’ law may run into the changing definition of ‘ownership’

4 点作者 fraqed超过 3 年前

1 comment

bediger4000超过 3 年前
Flat out bad reporting.<p>The definition of ownership is what led us to this situation in the first place. The concept of ownership of ideas (&quot;intellectual property&quot;) is what lets manufacturers currently limit who can repair what. More of the same, as in subscription models, renting devices, etc etc, will exacerbate the problem.<p>&quot;If you can go out and buy a flat-screen TV for $200, when it breaks, you throw it away, because it’ll cost you several hundred just to fix it even if you can find anyone who can do it&quot;<p>Sure, that covers &quot;repair&quot; but it does not cover any of the other myriad possibilities that laws limiting &quot;intellectual property&quot; based monopolies enable. This is the consumer harm model of allowing monopolies. We as consumers are only allowed what&#x27;s easy to quantify as benefits to us.