TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Singapore population sees biggest percentage drop since 1950

139 点作者 Yeri超过 3 年前

11 条评论

korginator超过 3 年前
This is not just about the loss of PRs or citizens. Singapore is one of the most expensive places in the world to live in.<p>More people in SG are choosing to marry later, have kids later, or have fewer kids. Many people register a marriage just to qualify for subsidised HDB housing, get that out of the way and focus on their careers.<p>Talking about children, schools and universities are highly subsidised for citizens, and somewhat discounted for PRs. For example [1] a citizen admitted to the National University of Singapore to study engineering pays $8,200 (about US$6,050) a year vs the $38,200 a year that an international student without any subsidies would pay.<p>This differentiation is even more marked for primary and secondary schools and junior colleges [2] for example a citizen pays $0 in primary school fees while a foreigner pays up to $775++ a month. A permanent resident attending secondary school pays $400 a months vs about $20-25 for a citizen.<p>This is a direct incentive for citizens to have more children, but also discourages PRs and foreigners from having children in SG, or to remain in SG for a long time if they don&#x27;t plan to become citizens.<p>Healthcare is also subsidised for citizens, you are covered by the CPF (pension scheme) MediShield plan, or a linked insurance policy, whereas PRs pay more and non-PRs have no CPF coverage.<p>In my experience, what you&#x27;re seeing here is a readjustment towards a new normal, nothing alarming, and probably what was planned all along.<p>[1] NUS tuition fees: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nus.edu.sg&#x2F;registrar&#x2F;administrative-policies-procedures&#x2F;undergraduate&#x2F;undergraduate-fees" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nus.edu.sg&#x2F;registrar&#x2F;administrative-policies-pro...</a><p>[2] MOE school fees: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.moe.gov.sg&#x2F;financial-matters&#x2F;fees" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.moe.gov.sg&#x2F;financial-matters&#x2F;fees</a>
评论 #28770151 未加载
评论 #28770446 未加载
评论 #28771114 未加载
评论 #28770334 未加载
评论 #28773243 未加载
cwwc超过 3 年前
<i>Every castle is built over a dungeon</i><p>This hit me hard when in Singapore. In particular because of the size: in such a small place, you can’t avoid seeing the migrant workers&#x2F;maids etc whereas it’s hidden in say, Paris. The contrast is so vivid.
评论 #28772770 未加载
评论 #28773237 未加载
评论 #28773471 未加载
refurb超过 3 年前
Much better article with a breakdown.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.channelnewsasia.com&#x2F;singapore&#x2F;singapore-population-shrink-citizen-pr-foreign-employment-ageing-2207136" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.channelnewsasia.com&#x2F;singapore&#x2F;singapore-populati...</a><p>Most interesting is not the foreign workers, which you would expect, but the loss of Permanent Residents (6.2%) and Citizens (0.7%).
评论 #28771573 未加载
评论 #28769441 未加载
archibaldJ超过 3 年前
A few Singaporean friends just sold their condos recently (with sizable returns). The real estate market is still going bullish in the past 5 years. Doesn&#x27;t appear to be impacted by the population shrink at all.
评论 #28770765 未加载
评论 #28781592 未加载
shell0x超过 3 年前
I lived in both Singapore and Sydney, and Singapore is cheaper - food is cheaper in SG - apartments were cheaper in Singapore. Sydney has become expensive - taxes are lower in Singapore - public transport is cheaper in Singapore - alcohol is expensive in both places - My company in Singapore paid medical, but in Australia I had to pay my own medical insurance - In Singapore I got paid all cash but in Australia it&#x27;s required to contribute to Super which is a horrible system compared to what America got - Expat salaries are higher than in Australia<p>Singapore has also public housing(HDBs) for locals which are more affordable. Sydney has no affordable housing at all.<p>I&#x27;d say I saved 30-40k more in SG every year.
ximeng超过 3 年前
1.2% drop in Hong Kong<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.scmp.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;hong-kong&#x2F;society&#x2F;article&#x2F;3144845&#x2F;hong-kongs-experiences-alarming-population-drop-government" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.scmp.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;hong-kong&#x2F;society&#x2F;article&#x2F;3144845&#x2F;...</a>
dstala超过 3 年前
Similar to other developed nations, Singapore has been experiencing a dwindling birth rate and ageing population.<p>&gt;&gt; And area where other developing countries like India are in position of advantage, but need to channel right.
评论 #28769475 未加载
评论 #28769493 未加载
评论 #28769565 未加载
评论 #28769440 未加载
评论 #28769355 未加载
评论 #28769781 未加载
jtdev超过 3 年前
Oh great, it seems that population growth globally is slowing due to low birth rates and aging populations. The population&#x2F;climate bomb cultists like Bill Gates should be pleased by this… it’ll give earth and its parasitic inhabitants easily another decade or two of (admittedly miserable) existence :)<p>Kidding of course. I’ll be eating cheeseburgers and driving a V8 full sized pickup into oblivion (even if I have to become a cattle rancher to do so). No regrets, the world that the “Great Reset” is creating is not one worth living in.
tim333超过 3 年前
It&#x27;s been pretty hard to enter Singapore travel wise since the pandemic started. I imagine some of the residents left to be able to travel around.
评论 #28771589 未加载
评论 #28781614 未加载
quacked超过 3 年前
There exist few talking points as odious as the myopic GDP-focused complaining about &quot;population decreases&quot; in developing nations and how they must be overcome by the unrestrained importing of labor.<p>Liberal societal goals (many of which I happen to support) include preservation of the natural environment, robust sovereignty of oppressed indigenous populations, increased availability of housing and resources, and in general an profound sense of the importance of any individual within their community. Every single one of these goals becomes <i>easier</i> to achieve the fewer people there are within a single geographic area, so why are these complaints about declining populations always coming from left-leaning thinkers and speakers? (I know Reuters isn&#x27;t exactly left wing, but the language they&#x27;re using is identical to &#x27;progressive&#x27; politicians all over the west.)<p>The time immediately following the Black Death in Europe was a massive boon for the (surviving) commoner. When people talk about declining populations in Western countries, I imagine razing the unsustainable, disgusting post-war boomtowns, layering farmland and forest over their remains, and pushing a philosophy of local self-reliance born out of community solidarity. It is truly unnerving to see so many publications talk about this issue and imply that the only hope for any nation with a declining population is to bring in as much supplementary labor as possible. I can only hope the people of Singapore are happy with whatever their economic leaders have decided is best for them.
评论 #28769657 未加载
评论 #28769482 未加载
评论 #28769449 未加载
评论 #28773594 未加载
评论 #28769417 未加载
megablast超过 3 年前
Finally some good news.