TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Samsung Foundry Forum announcements

168 点作者 ittan超过 3 年前

10 条评论

MangoCoffee超过 3 年前
&gt; process technology migration to 3- and 2-nanometer (nm) based on the company’s Gate-All-Around (GAA) transistor structure<p>I believe GAA is the next gen tech for the node process. Samsung is the first foundry to do GAA w&#x2F;3nm while TSMC is sticking w&#x2F;FinFET for their 3nm. It&#x27;ll be interesting to see how 3nm FinFET compare to 3nm GAA.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.anandtech.com&#x2F;show&#x2F;16041&#x2F;where-are-my-gaafets-tsmc-to-stay-with-finfet-for-3nm" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.anandtech.com&#x2F;show&#x2F;16041&#x2F;where-are-my-gaafets-ts...</a><p>edit:<p>&gt;After that, transistor structures begin to change. Samsung and TSMC are manufacturing chips at 7nm and 5nm based on today’s finFETs. Samsung will move to nanosheet FETs at 3nm. Intel is also developing GAA technology. TSMC plans to extend finFETs to 3nm, and then will migrate to nanosheet FETs at 2nm around 2024.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;semiengineering.com&#x2F;the-increasingly-uneven-race-to-3nm-2nm&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;semiengineering.com&#x2F;the-increasingly-uneven-race-to-...</a>
评论 #28796202 未加载
评论 #28799604 未加载
评论 #28795227 未加载
1-6超过 3 年前
Samsung has a dishonorable marketing department. 3nm is not actually 3nm. I&#x27;m fed up... OLED is superior so they had to take the path of calling theirs QLED which is actually just an LCD screen with phosphors on top of a blue backlight (and it&#x27;s nothing new).
评论 #28795530 未加载
评论 #28794679 未加载
评论 #28795130 未加载
评论 #28794765 未加载
评论 #28795914 未加载
评论 #28794737 未加载
评论 #28799741 未加载
评论 #28795149 未加载
评论 #28795031 未加载
nabaraz超过 3 年前
I can never remember what xnm means as it varies between companies.<p>In this case,<p>Samsung&#x27;s 3nm = Intel&#x27;s 7nm<p>I am still waiting for a standard based on transistor density numbers!
评论 #28795164 未加载
评论 #28794345 未加载
评论 #28794440 未加载
评论 #28796120 未加载
评论 #28796628 未加载
catmanjan超过 3 年前
There are a few comments saying that 3nm is a marketing term and that the transistors are actually larger - how is this allowed? Isn&#x27;t it misleading and deceptive?
评论 #28794644 未加载
评论 #28794347 未加载
评论 #28797181 未加载
评论 #28795531 未加载
评论 #28795461 未加载
评论 #28794349 未加载
spark3k超过 3 年前
At what point does quantum tunnelling become a problem?
评论 #28794299 未加载
评论 #28794164 未加载
评论 #28794814 未加载
评论 #28794290 未加载
评论 #28794165 未加载
评论 #28799713 未加载
kulor超过 3 年前
For silicon n00bs like myself, listen to Acquired&#x27;s recent episode for some context on how hard this area of innovation is <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.acquired.fm&#x2F;episodes&#x2F;tsmc" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.acquired.fm&#x2F;episodes&#x2F;tsmc</a>.<p>Off the back of this episode, I can&#x27;t help but feel TSMC&#x27;s monopoly needs disrupting with players like Samsung to contend with Taiwan &amp; China&#x27;s geopolitical tension.
yboris超过 3 年前
&gt; Samsung To Mass Produce 2nm Chips in 2025<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.tomshardware.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;samsung-foundry-to-produce-2nm-chips-in-2025" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.tomshardware.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;samsung-foundry-to-produce...</a>
pabs3超过 3 年前
Hmm, I wonder how this compares to TSMC&#x2F;Intel in terms of transistor density?<p>Is transistor density the best measure of chip competitiveness these days?
hokumguru超过 3 年前
At what point do we have to stop because we’ve hit physical limits? At 3nm we are talking transistors only a few dozen atoms wide, what’s the smallest theoretical transistor we can build?
评论 #28794684 未加载
评论 #28795147 未加载
评论 #28794303 未加载
freen超过 3 年前
If their chip fan has the same commitment to QA as their TV’s, I’ll pass.