TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Heroku is a bus, Engineyard is a car

20 点作者 mainguy将近 14 年前

3 条评论

dasil003将近 14 年前
I take issue with the offhanded remark that Heroku is cheaper. The whole point of Engine Yard for me is that it is a straight markup on AWS services, and you can run whatever you damn well please on your instances. With Heroku A and B might be free, and C is an add-on costing an arm and a leg, even though it's all open source software requiring the same amount of resources.<p>The way I see it, Heroku is ideal when you are small, Engine Yard is good up until medium size, but if you ever hit real scale, the overhead is not at all worth the benefit.
qeorge将近 14 年前
Nit:<p><i>[Engine Yard is] really easy if you have a public github repo, but anything other than that starts to get "more complicated" quickly.</i><p>You can also hook it up to a private Unfuddle repo, and I would assume private github repos too.
评论 #2887158 未加载
Hisoka将近 14 年前
If you use GitHub, EngineYard is pretty easy and smooth to use as well. Just git push, then redeploy. The only pain is creating custom recipes for stuff they don't support. But I do like the ability to SSH. I can go in, run scripts, delete files, etc. Heroku seems too much of a walled garden.