TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Why Can't Epic's AI model Detect Sepsis?

14 点作者 stuartbman超过 3 年前

6 条评论

Enginerrrd超过 3 年前
I used to work in emergency medicine as a paramedic. A far cry from an MD for sure, but here's my two cents: Unless they were already in decline, I never suspected Sepsis based solely on vitals. It was usually more of a gut feel thing. It can present with weird symptoms, like unexplained joint pain in multiple joints and things like that. I think that two key tells are patient history and patient cognition relative to baseline. My favorite question to ask family is: "How are they normally?" It's hard to measure these things with vitals so the AI doesn't have the right data going in, IMO. But, take all this with a grain of salt as I am deeply uninformed on the subject.
评论 #28879446 未加载
mdaidc超过 3 年前
The title is misleading and wrong. &quot;AI&quot; from a specific company(Epic) can&#x27;t detect sepsis. But technology exists from people that known what they are doing, such as Johns Hopkin&#x27;s spin-off Bayesian [1], and they have been very successful in detecting Sepsis.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bayesianhealth.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bayesianhealth.com</a>
评论 #28877888 未加载
评论 #28879378 未加载
jackhack超过 3 年前
It looks like Duke University School Of Medicine figured it out. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;physicians.dukehealth.org&#x2F;articles&#x2F;dukes-augmented-intelligence-system-helps-prevent-sepsis-ed" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;physicians.dukehealth.org&#x2F;articles&#x2F;dukes-augmented-i...</a><p>(after I posted this, the title of this story has changed to be EPIC-specific - it was &quot;Why Can&#x27;t AI Detect Sepsis?&quot;)
amelius超过 3 年前
&gt; Why Can&#x27;t AI Detect Sepsis?<p>&gt; (...)<p>&gt; The details of ESM&#x27;s development is proprietary<p>That last word is why.
评论 #28877821 未加载
stuartbman超过 3 年前
Granted this is the review of a single model, but given that it&#x27;s by one of the big players in the EMR space, it shows how challenging this problem is. Sepsis is easy to under-recognise, and difficult to identify reliably without lots (and lots) of false alarms.
评论 #28878720 未加载
kritiko超过 3 年前
I think this headline is slightly misleading since the writeup doesn&#x27;t really go into the &quot;why&quot; or generalize past Epic&#x27;s performance.<p>The TLDR is much more accurate: &quot;A widely used sepsis prediction tool demonstrated poor performance in an independent validation, with worse results than clinician judgement and an increased burden of alert fatigue.&quot;