<i>"The one thing that doesn’t change is that they want to make profits," [Will Hall] noted. "Not to get too far into theory, but what’s happening here, I think, is basic economics. For a lot of years, there were more workers than jobs. Now, I think that’s changed."</i><p>Yup. It's pretty basic. Labor gets a better deal in one of two ways.<p>1. Reduction in workforce. Historically, Black Death and wars.<p>2. Collective action. Guilds, unions, trades, and the like.<p>I honestly didn't think I'd live to see Labor doing better. I'm glad there's finally some movement. I'm sorry it took a pandemic.<p>[Yes, there's multiple forces. Things are never simple, there's always more to the story. Aging workforce, (mostly men) opting out, (mostly woman) stuck with child and elder care, wave of early retirement, reduction in immigration, increased disability and mortality, and probably more.]<p>--<p>Also interesting in this story:<p><i>"This week, Winston Plywood, through its investors, a Connecticut-based equity firm, announced a new wage structure."</i><p>Access to capital.<p>If policy makers want employers to increase wages, we need to consider how to make it happen.<p>I'm <i>totally onboard</i> with using pandemic crisis cheddar (governmental largess) to provide capital to distressed businesses. Especially locally owned. Loans, grants, debt forgiveness, whatever.<p>Corporations and trusts receive billions. That'll never stop. I just want some of that torrent of cash to go directly to where it will help the most. Versus waiting for it to "trickle down".