The last line of the article, <i>Risky.Biz has no reason to believe Pastebin data was actually leaked by an RSA employee</i>, appears to contradict the article's own headline.
So, because a recently dumped list of IPs contains some subset of a publicly posted list of known compromised IPs, that's proof it wasn't faked?<p>Is there something I'm missing, or is that meaningless?