TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Reading Obsession

114 点作者 _ttg超过 3 年前

23 条评论

jl6超过 3 年前
In school, we are drilled into thinking reading is an unqualified good thing. Reading programmes exist to boost the amount of reading children do. Parents chastise their kids for watching TV instead of reading a book.<p>Against this background, we forget that reading is ultimately a form of consumption. It doesn’t <i>inherently</i> make the world a better place. It doesn’t, by itself, <i>produce</i> anything.<p>It matters a lot <i>what</i> you read. Reading can be a gateway to learning and fulfilment, but it can also be an addictive time-sink that leads nowhere. It’s a particular trap for those with an intellectual or introverted bent.<p>I fear that the good intentions of teachers trying to get kids to read more at all costs risks only doing half the job, and leaving a population without the media literacy to choose wisely which books to consume, or without the restraint to know when it’s time to stop reading and start acting.
评论 #29068999 未加载
评论 #29070662 未加载
评论 #29069644 未加载
评论 #29069905 未加载
评论 #29070229 未加载
评论 #29076089 未加载
luigi23超过 3 年前
&quot;Don’t get me wrong: I love to read. But what ticks me off is when a specific behavior gets taken out of context and fetishized.&quot;<p>Ha, my hot take - book lovers love to have an item&#x2F;collectible rather than the content. It&#x27;s mostly signaling and, for some people, reading is quite fun (a nice bonus!).<p>No wonder - the numbers of active readers are very low, but all those self-help gurus and experts praising books are doing a disservice to the point of reading books - enjoying them, highlighting, making it your own. Later a problem arises - some of my friends complained that they don&#x27;t remember a lot from read books. Of course, since reading is A RiTuAl!<p>It&#x27;s amusing when I say that &#x27;I hate books&#x27;. But usually I read more (books) than my peers, I just don&#x27;t like the form factor of the book. It&#x27;s heavy, making notes is clunky compared to Kindle or any other ereader. I don&#x27;t care about all that fluff and &#x27;smell of paper&#x27;.<p>Reminds me of this funny twitter drama when one author was cutting big books into smaller pieces: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.vice.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;article&#x2F;bvgmxd&#x2F;cutting-books-in-half-tweet" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.vice.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;article&#x2F;bvgmxd&#x2F;cutting-books-in-half...</a>
评论 #29068944 未加载
评论 #29069814 未加载
评论 #29070468 未加载
npsimons超过 3 年前
&gt; [Graham] didn’t go to lunch that day—he just sat there and talked to me [Buffet] for four hours like I was the most important person in the world. When he opened that door to me, he opened the door to the insurance world.” The Snowball<p>That&#x27;s great! Guess what the vast majority of people don&#x27;t have access to? Really great mentors. Unless, and hear me out here, those mentors wrote down their wisdom, say some great work of philosophy[0] or even a groundbreaking technical work[1]. Even better, you can access these founts of knowledge after their authors have passed on!<p>[0] - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.gutenberg.org&#x2F;ebooks&#x2F;2680" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.gutenberg.org&#x2F;ebooks&#x2F;2680</a><p>[1] - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Principia_Mathematica" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Principia_Mathematica</a>
评论 #29070858 未加载
评论 #29075856 未加载
madiator超过 3 年前
Reading is important, and I have heard this advice many times, yet I never took it to say reading is the only thing that matters. The advice on reading 500 pages a day will not work for most people, indeed!<p>Here is a good succinct and practical advice from Naval:<p>&quot;Reading science, math, and philosophy one hour per day will likely put you at the upper echelon of human success within seven years&quot; (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mobile.twitter.com&#x2F;naval&#x2F;status&#x2F;871415571551629312?lang=en" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mobile.twitter.com&#x2F;naval&#x2F;status&#x2F;871415571551629312?l...</a>)<p>Just one hour! Doing that consistently can be hard but very beneficial.
评论 #29068444 未加载
评论 #29071713 未加载
j7ake超过 3 年前
Maybe one analogy to professional sports would be something like &quot;Watching film&quot;.<p>As a professional athlete, you need to be constant watching film so you know how other players are playing and what they&#x27;re doing.<p>However, at some point you also need to be on the court practicing and playing games so you can use that knowledge for something productive.<p>Being too obsessed with reading would be like a pro athlete who only watches film and never plays the game. At some point, you have to be playing the game. Otherwise, you&#x27;re no different than just an obsessive sports fan.
jimbokun超过 3 年前
Good reminder to balance reading and learning, developing relationships with peers, and taking actions.<p>If you spend the next 50 years just reading, you will realize you missed the opportunity to make an impact on the world, whatever your goals are. If you just act randomly, you probably won&#x27;t get anywhere either. And if you only read and act alone, you probably are limiting both your opportunities to learn and your opportunities to leverage your efforts by working with others.
评论 #29068283 未加载
评论 #29068248 未加载
AlbertCory超过 3 年前
&quot;Obsession&quot;? The author is perhaps noticing that some people take this literally:<p><i>“I just sit in my office and read all day.” - Warren Buffett</i><p>Are people really taking this literally? Maybe they are, now that you <i>at least get the impression</i> can sit in your office and surf the web all day. You know that a lot of &quot;journalists&quot; actually do that, and that&#x27;s why they&#x27;re so shallow and prone to groupthink.<p>A real journalist, and a real investor, goes out and talks to people, and finds the information that hasn&#x27;t made its way onto paper or the web yet.
评论 #29068853 未加载
djkivi超过 3 年前
“Reading, after a certain age, diverts the mind too much from its creative pursuits. Any man who reads too much and uses his own brain too little falls into lazy habits of thinking.” - Albert Einstein<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.goodreads.com&#x2F;quotes&#x2F;38019-reading-after-a-certain-age-diverts-the-mind-too-much" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.goodreads.com&#x2F;quotes&#x2F;38019-reading-after-a-certa...</a>
mfrankel超过 3 年前
Why lectures don&#x27;t work. &quot;Lectures don’t work because the medium lacks a functioning cognitive model. It’s (implicitly) built on a faulty idea about how people learn—transmissionism—which we can caricaturize as “lecturer says words describing an idea; students hear words; then they understand.” When lectures do work, it’s generally as part of a broader learning context (e.g. projects, problem sets) with a better cognitive model. But the lectures aren’t pulling their weight. If we really wanted to adopt the better model, we’d ditch the lectures, and indeed, that’s what’s been happening in US K–12 education.&quot;<p>Why books don&#x27;t work &quot;In this section we’ve seen that, like lectures, non-fiction books don’t work because they lack a functioning cognitive model. Instead, like lectures, they’re (accidentally, invisibly) built on a faulty idea about how people learn: transmissionism. When books do work, it’s generally for readers who deploy skillful metacognition to engage effectively with the book’s ideas. This kind of metacognition is unavailable to many readers and taxing for the rest. Books aren’t pulling their weight. Textbooks do more to help, but they still foist most of the metacognition onto the reader, and they ignore many important ideas about how people learn.&quot;<p>Worth reading: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;andymatuschak.org&#x2F;books&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;andymatuschak.org&#x2F;books&#x2F;</a>
gumby超过 3 年前
I think a “functional” view of reading is self-limiting — a sort of cargo cult. It’s a shame to spend a lot of time just grinding.<p>I read about five hours a day (about a third of my waking hours) but have no illusion that it is of any specific value. It’s just a compulsion I’ve had all my life. I don’t consider it any different from others playing video games — not a virtue and perhaps tending towards vice.
syngrog66超过 3 年前
lectures dont work on me because you&#x27;re pushing things into my brain whether I care or not, whether I already know or not, whether I&#x27;m ready or focused, and don&#x27;t give me a chance to pause or ask questions, or crosscheck terms or go off on fractal pseudo-tangents to fill in the blanks in my mental map, etc.<p>therefore, for me, reading is soooo much better. though video lectures at least allow you to pause, its still too little signal density with too much noise, usually.<p>Also I am a very visual learner, and I use mental maps &amp; 3D&#x2F;4D system models inside my mind, and build&#x2F;run little simulations in there as part of understanding and leveraging that knowledge. reading text &amp; diagram inputs &quot;fit&quot; with that brain style better than traditional classroom lectures<p>pull (on demand, when ready) rather than push
评论 #29075446 未加载
nicodjimenez超过 3 年前
Reading is excellent cognitive training. Especially reading fiction. It makes you step outside your ordinary reality and truly live in someone else&#x27;s shoes. You get cognitive benefit as well as spiritual benefit from reading great fiction.<p>Non fiction is also OK but generally less appropriate for reading cover to cover. Non fiction is great for just getting what you need and getting out. The way you learn physics, for example, is not by reading physics books, it&#x27;s by solving problems. By experiencing the real thing.<p>Reading fiction has self contained benefit. Reading non fiction is only useful to the extent to which you can apply this information in your daily life.
评论 #29070848 未加载
spicyramen超过 3 年前
In foreign languages such as Spanish, ortography is very important: reading helps you get better at it. This is true normally pre-college years.
评论 #29072927 未加载
pcmaffey超过 3 年前
It&#x27;s almost like Buffet was able to master remote work before it became a thing.
评论 #29068433 未加载
评论 #29067981 未加载
评论 #29070983 未加载
tmountain超过 3 年前
I&#x27;ve regularly read that the average CEO reads 60 books a year. While I have worked with one CEO that read a lot, most seem far too busy working on business problems to have that kind of free time. Granted, I&#x27;ve been working in smaller (250 people or fewer) companies most of my career, but it seems very difficult to fit in a book per week when you get home at 7:30 or 8:00 and you&#x27;re playing catch up on the weekends.
评论 #29068935 未加载
devlife超过 3 年前
I wonder if the 500 page comment Buffett made was ever meant to be taken seriously. Maybe he just said for the sake of motivating students.
Zababa超过 3 年前
I have an article called &quot;Consume less, produce more&quot; (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.chrismytton.com&#x2F;2020&#x2F;09&#x2F;24&#x2F;consume-less-produce-more&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.chrismytton.com&#x2F;2020&#x2F;09&#x2F;24&#x2F;consume-less-produce-...</a>) in my bookmarks toolbar that&#x27;s always visible as a reminder of that.
评论 #29089872 未加载
paulpauper超过 3 年前
reading is good, but doing is even better, or a combination of both..<p>&quot;“I just sit in my office and read all day.” - Warren Buffett&quot;<p>I think they get the causality wrong.<p>It&#x27;s not like he became so rich by reading, same for bill gates. He had to actually do the thing that which made him rich. Once you get billions then I guess you can spend all day reading.
mensetmanusman超过 3 年前
This reminds me of an investment banker who told us that they would have had a much better year if they had just sat on their hands and read for 12 months.<p>If you are a dividend (re)investor for 90 years, you too could be rich one day!
DantesKite超过 3 年前
I really enjoyed this perspective on Charlie Munger. It was refreshing and new.
kubb超过 3 年前
People keep telling me: kubb, go to work; kubb look at this bug; kubb, contribute this new feature; kubb work out; kubb clean your apartment.<p>But I just want to read (and play video games and socialize).
madiator超过 3 年前
It takes me three minutes to read one page. 500 pages per day will take only 25 hours a day. :)
评论 #29071347 未加载
ketzo超过 3 年前
Something that is not explicitly mentioned in this piece, but that I think is probably a large contributor to why Mr. Buffet found success with this path:<p>It is very difficult to be wrong while you&#x27;re reading. It&#x27;s much easier for someone who&#x27;s actually talking to you to show you that an opinion you hold is incorrect. And you can&#x27;t improve at anything without learning when you&#x27;re wrong.
评论 #29068179 未加载